共和党提名黑女大法官,白等=拜灯给弄掉了。
黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
版主: Topgolf118, wass
版面规则
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
#23 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
至少我认识的黑人里面混得比较好的,基本都是支持共和党的,虽然他们还是会投票给奥巴驴。这些人是有脑子的,明白照民主党这么搞下去这个国家是要完蛋的。
#24 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
当年保守派大法官Scalia 对汤马斯的评论
“Look, I’m an originalist, but I’m not a nut.”
— Justice Antonin Scalia, when asked to compare his judicial philosophy to that of Justice Clarence Thomas.
https://abovethelaw.com/2014/07/scalia- ... mas-a-nut/
“Look, I’m an originalist, but I’m not a nut.”
— Justice Antonin Scalia, when asked to compare his judicial philosophy to that of Justice Clarence Thomas.
https://abovethelaw.com/2014/07/scalia- ... mas-a-nut/
#31 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
老布什搞出一个托马斯来恶心人,小布什当然也可以搞出一个离谱的黑女来恶心人。
Opinion Why Republican senators kept bringing up Janice Rogers Brown
By Ruth Marcus
Associate editor
Follow author
Follow
March 22, 2022 at 5:55 p.m. EDT
Opinion Why Republican senators kept bringing up Janice Rogers Brown
By Ruth Marcus
Associate editor
Follow author
Follow
March 22, 2022 at 5:55 p.m. EDT
#33 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
Janice Rogers Brown was nominated to appellate court in 2003, which is the obvious stepping stone toward the high court. Had Dem not blocked her, she would be a very probable female Thomas ten years down the road.
#34 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
block又怎么样? 她不还是坐上了DC巡回法院的位子了吗? 垫脚石不是有了吗?提名她当大法官了吗? 没有的话, 何来被拜登给搞掉了的呢?
#36 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
你可以arugue, 如果她在2003就上位了,那么凭这点经验2005真有可能被提名到高院,而当时参院挡不住。
现在的这个白女被提名的时候,也才3年appellate的经验。
“Her 2003 nomination by George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was opposed by civil rights groups and stalled for nearly two years by Democratic senators who saw her as an extreme "conservative judicial activist.” She was eventually re-nominated and confirmed in 2005. The following month, after Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired from the United States Supreme Court, Brown was reportedly considered as a potential nominee to replace O'Connor. Brown was ultimately not nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
现在的这个白女被提名的时候,也才3年appellate的经验。
“Her 2003 nomination by George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was opposed by civil rights groups and stalled for nearly two years by Democratic senators who saw her as an extreme "conservative judicial activist.” She was eventually re-nominated and confirmed in 2005. The following month, after Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired from the United States Supreme Court, Brown was reportedly considered as a potential nominee to replace O'Connor. Brown was ultimately not nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
#37 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
如果被提名, 为什么当时参院挡不住? 当时小布什先是提名自己的亲信Harriet Miers 结果连票都没投就不得不撤下来
fieldman 写了: ↑2024年 6月 11日 14:05 你可以arugue, 如果她在2003就上位了,那么凭这点经验2005真有可能被提名到高院,而当时参院挡不住。
现在的这个白女被提名的时候,也才3年appellate的经验。
“Her 2003 nomination by George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was opposed by civil rights groups and stalled for nearly two years by Democratic senators who saw her as an extreme "conservative judicial activist.” She was eventually re-nominated and confirmed in 2005. The following month, after Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired from the United States Supreme Court, Brown was reportedly considered as a potential nominee to replace O'Connor. Brown was ultimately not nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
-
- 论坛精英
Zephyrca 的博客 - 帖子互动: 532
- 帖子: 7385
- 注册时间: 2022年 8月 12日 22:10
#38 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
还有Ben Carson,Candice Owen。脑子清醒有道德的黑人,只有他们才能让更多黑人清醒过来
保守派们欢迎来美国时政版:
https://newmitbbs.com/viewforum.php?f=71
https://newmitbbs.com/viewforum.php?f=71