共和党提名黑女大法官,白等=拜灯给弄掉了。
黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
版主: Topgolf118, wass
版面规则
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
#23 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
至少我认识的黑人里面混得比较好的,基本都是支持共和党的,虽然他们还是会投票给奥巴驴。这些人是有脑子的,明白照民主党这么搞下去这个国家是要完蛋的。
#24 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
当年保守派大法官Scalia 对汤马斯的评论
“Look, I’m an originalist, but I’m not a nut.”
— Justice Antonin Scalia, when asked to compare his judicial philosophy to that of Justice Clarence Thomas.
https://abovethelaw.com/2014/07/scalia- ... mas-a-nut/
“Look, I’m an originalist, but I’m not a nut.”
— Justice Antonin Scalia, when asked to compare his judicial philosophy to that of Justice Clarence Thomas.
https://abovethelaw.com/2014/07/scalia- ... mas-a-nut/
OBNB 写了: 2024年 5月 31日 18:01 哦,坚持保守理念的法官是激进,难道搞lGBTQ的属于温和?
你是不是对中文的理解有问题,激进是什么意思?
左派的标准定义就是提倡用激进的手段实现社会改革,希望你把这些基本概念搞清楚再来发表意见
#26 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
等我有机会找出来。
民主党的虚伪就在这里。如果不支持民主党左臂的理念,就会被开除黑人籍。
白等2020不就说过吗,if you don't support (me or Democrat), you are not blacks.
看看民主党多虚伪,赤裸裸的,直接的谎言诈骗
民主党的虚伪就在这里。如果不支持民主党左臂的理念,就会被开除黑人籍。
白等2020不就说过吗,if you don't support (me or Democrat), you are not blacks.
看看民主党多虚伪,赤裸裸的,直接的谎言诈骗
#30 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
好像是有那么个人? rumor就是这么传起来的。
叔也不是最高法院历史的白丁, 愣是从没听说过这么档子事。 所以才要个link好好学习学习。
叔也不是最高法院历史的白丁, 愣是从没听说过这么档子事。 所以才要个link好好学习学习。
#31 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
老布什搞出一个托马斯来恶心人,小布什当然也可以搞出一个离谱的黑女来恶心人。
Opinion Why Republican senators kept bringing up Janice Rogers Brown
By Ruth Marcus
Associate editor
Follow author
Follow
March 22, 2022 at 5:55 p.m. EDT
Opinion Why Republican senators kept bringing up Janice Rogers Brown
By Ruth Marcus
Associate editor
Follow author
Follow
March 22, 2022 at 5:55 p.m. EDT
#32 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
拜托。 提名汤马斯是在1991年, 来替代退休的马歇尔。 那个时候,这个黑女什么都不是, 她跟最高法院能有什么关系。fieldman 写了: 2024年 6月 11日 12:08 老布什搞出一个托马斯来恶心人,小布什当然也可以搞出一个离谱的黑女来恶心人。
Opinion Why Republican senators kept bringing up Janice Rogers Brown
By Ruth Marcus
Associate editor
Follow author
Follow
March 22, 2022 at 5:55 p.m. EDT
#33 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
Janice Rogers Brown was nominated to appellate court in 2003, which is the obvious stepping stone toward the high court. Had Dem not blocked her, she would be a very probable female Thomas ten years down the road.
#34 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
block又怎么样? 她不还是坐上了DC巡回法院的位子了吗? 垫脚石不是有了吗?提名她当大法官了吗? 没有的话, 何来被拜登给搞掉了的呢?
fieldman 写了: 2024年 6月 11日 13:49 Janice Rogers Brown was nominated to appellate court in 2003, which is the obvious stepping stone toward the high court. Had Dem not blocked her, she would be a very probable female Thomas ten years down the road.
#36 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
你可以arugue, 如果她在2003就上位了,那么凭这点经验2005真有可能被提名到高院,而当时参院挡不住。
现在的这个白女被提名的时候,也才3年appellate的经验。
“Her 2003 nomination by George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was opposed by civil rights groups and stalled for nearly two years by Democratic senators who saw her as an extreme "conservative judicial activist.” She was eventually re-nominated and confirmed in 2005. The following month, after Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired from the United States Supreme Court, Brown was reportedly considered as a potential nominee to replace O'Connor. Brown was ultimately not nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
现在的这个白女被提名的时候,也才3年appellate的经验。
“Her 2003 nomination by George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was opposed by civil rights groups and stalled for nearly two years by Democratic senators who saw her as an extreme "conservative judicial activist.” She was eventually re-nominated and confirmed in 2005. The following month, after Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired from the United States Supreme Court, Brown was reportedly considered as a potential nominee to replace O'Connor. Brown was ultimately not nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
#37 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
如果被提名, 为什么当时参院挡不住? 当时小布什先是提名自己的亲信Harriet Miers 结果连票都没投就不得不撤下来
fieldman 写了: 2024年 6月 11日 14:05 你可以arugue, 如果她在2003就上位了,那么凭这点经验2005真有可能被提名到高院,而当时参院挡不住。
现在的这个白女被提名的时候,也才3年appellate的经验。
“Her 2003 nomination by George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was opposed by civil rights groups and stalled for nearly two years by Democratic senators who saw her as an extreme "conservative judicial activist.” She was eventually re-nominated and confirmed in 2005. The following month, after Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired from the United States Supreme Court, Brown was reportedly considered as a potential nominee to replace O'Connor. Brown was ultimately not nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
-
- 论坛支柱
Zephyrca 的博客 - 帖子互动: 821
- 帖子: 8854
- 注册时间: 2022年 8月 12日 22:10
#38 Re: 黑人是主党的基本盘,为啥最高法院的汤姆斯这么站在共和党这边
还有Ben Carson,Candice Owen。脑子清醒有道德的黑人,只有他们才能让更多黑人清醒过来OBNB 写了: 2024年 5月 31日 17:39 阁下关心政治也算很久了吧。怎么会问这么幼稚的问题?似乎你是今天醒来后才开始关心政治似的。
只有左臂才简单机械地搞identity politics, 搞标签化,要把肤色把族裔跟思想理念绝对等同起来。
虽然黑人92%投民主党,但也有8%投共和党,那就意味着有350万的黑人是支持共和党的。
而黑人中的共和党支持者,他们要在周围绝大多数黑人的鄙视下坚持自己的理念,是需要对保守理念强大的信念的;因此他们的保守理念往往会比其他族裔的保守派的理念更坚定。
Thomas就是这样一位保守派;还有像索维尔,保守主义的教父级思想家。
保守派们欢迎来美国时政版:viewforum.php?f=71
欢迎光顾枪械射击版:viewforum.php?f=72