6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
版主： alexwlt1024
版面规则
左也行，右也行，文明发帖就欢迎；粉也罢，黑也罢，互相尊重别谩骂。
左也行，右也行，文明发帖就欢迎；粉也罢，黑也罢，互相尊重别谩骂。
#101 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
jb爷不是已经干了么？你还让我看什么？
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#103 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
早就听完了，我听不出你的意思，我就觉得合情合理有合法，congress怎么会没有管理移民的权力？难道我帝已经成为罗马了？无国界了？不需要主权了？
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#105 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
排华法案当然也是法。当年是法，以后也能是法。
赖美豪中 写了： 2024年 9月 17日 20:38 早就听完了，我听不出你的意思，我就觉得合情合理有合法，congress怎么会没有管理移民的权力？难道我帝已经成为罗马了？无国界了？不需要主权了？
#106 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
笑尿了，您的意思就是如果有人干错一件事，咱就得把这人干活得权力剥夺了？这么理解得没错把？
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#108 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
你理解能力可能比普金老师高一点，但是还是低的可怕。道义上的错和法理上的错是一个意思么？高院认为程序不是错的，排华法案时代还有种族隔离呢。很多州都有隔离法，高院按个推翻了么？你拿着康熙得尚方宝剑去斩大明得官，能实现么
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#109 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
你现在也意识到美国政府并不认为他们当时做错了
赖美豪中 写了： 2024年 9月 17日 20:57 你理解能力可能比普金老师高一点，但是还是低的可怕。道义上的错和法理上的错是一个意思么？高院认为程序不是错的，排华法案时代还有种族隔离呢。很多州都有隔离法，高院按个推翻了么？你拿着康熙得尚方宝剑去斩大明得官，能实现么
#114 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
我没有要美国人切腹， 我是建议你切腹。
历史上的对错现在要纠正的多着呢。高院不能平白无故跳出来说这个这个法案错了。你去起诉人家不给你政屁， 闹到高院， 也许就纠正了。你要不试试？
说你有病就有病
#115 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
美国人干坏事，你从什么样的逻辑出发要我切腹
你也许没看视频，这是参议员再对大法官候选人提问。
我不会去试，美国的衙门八字开，有理无钱莫进来。
你也许没看视频，这是参议员再对大法官候选人提问。
我不会去试，美国的衙门八字开，有理无钱莫进来。
lexian 写了： 2024年 9月 17日 21:59 我没有要美国人切腹， 我是建议你切腹。
历史上的对错现在要纠正的多着呢。高院不能平白无故跳出来说这个这个法案错了。你去起诉人家不给你政屁， 闹到高院， 也许就纠正了。你要不试试？
#116 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
因为看你背粪呀， 150前的立法让你寝食难安， 美国从一开始的新大陆-你请人来人家都不想来， 到后面随便想来就来， 再到后面不是谁想来就能来-是一个漫长的数百年的过程。 我不觉得美国就必须是个移民国家， 一个国家是否接受移民， 接受什么样的移民是这个国家公民的选择。 美国接受了我， 我很感激。 它要是不接受我， 我也不觉得人家就欠我的。 这世界不接受移民的国家是大多数。Havana 写了： 2024年 9月 17日 22:07 美国人干坏事，你从什么样的逻辑出发要我切腹
你也许没看视频，这是参议员再对大法官候选人提问。
我不会去试，美国的衙门八字开，有理无钱莫进来。
说你有病就有病
#117 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
我有什么悲愤的，我喜欢看你这样的美华下跪。
lexian 写了： 2024年 9月 17日 22:34 因为看你背粪呀， 150前的立法让你寝食难安， 美国从一开始的新大陆-你请人来人家都不想来， 到后面随便想来就来， 再到后面不是谁想来就能来-是一个漫长的数百年的过程。 我不觉得美国就必须是个移民国家， 一个国家是否接受移民， 接受什么样的移民是这个国家公民的选择。 美国接受了我， 我很感激。 它要是不接受我， 我也不觉得人家就欠我的。 这世界不接受移民的国家是大多数。
#118 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
排华法案(第七章）所有节要么是omitted要么是repealed.
但是作为一章没有被repeal
CHAPTER 7—EXCLUSION OF CHINESE
Editorial Notes
Codification
Former chapter 7 of this title included the provisions of the several Chinese Exclusion acts, beginning with the temporary act of May 6, 1882, ch. 126, 22 Stat. 58, which, as being then in force, were, by act Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1630, §5, 33 Stat. 428, amending act Apr. 29, 1902, ch. 641, 32 Stat. 176, "re-enacted, extended, and continued, without modification, limitation, or condition;" with the further provisions of the act and those of subsequent acts relating to the subject which remained in force.
§261. Omitted
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, acts Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §7, 32 Stat. 828; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §14, June 10, 1933; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. V, eff. June 14, 1940, 5 F.R. 2423, 54 Stat. 1238, conferred upon the Attorney General the authority, power, and jurisdiction by virtue of any law relating to the exclusion from and residence within the United States, its Territories and the District of Columbia, of Chinese and persons of Chinese descent, and vested in the collectors of customs and collectors of internal revenue, under control of the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, as the Attorney General might designate therefor, the authority, power, and jurisdiction in relation to such exclusion previously vested in such officers. It was omitted as obsolete in view of the repeal, by act Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §1, 57 Stat. 600, of sections 262 to 297 and 299 of this title.
§§262 to 297. Repealed. Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §1, 57 Stat. 600
Sections, acts May 6, 1882, ch. 126, §§1, 3, 6–13, 15, 16, 22 Stat. 59–61; July 5, 1884, ch. 220, 23 Stat. 115–118; Sept. 13, 1888, ch. 1015, §§5–11, 13, 14, 25 Stat. 477–479; Oct. 1, 1888, ch. 1064, §§1, 2, 25 Stat. 504; May 5, 1892, ch. 60, §§1–3, 5–8, 27 Stat. 25, 26; Nov. 3, 1893, ch. 14, §§1, 2, 28 Stat. 7, 8; July 7, 1898, No. 55, §1 (part), 30 Stat. 751; Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §1, 31 Stat. 161; June 6, 1900, ch. 791, §1 (part), 31 Stat. 611; Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 845, §§1–3, 31 Stat. 1093; Apr. 29, 1902, ch. 641, §§1, 2, 4, 32 Stat. 176, 177; Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1630, §5, 33 Stat. 428; Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 355, §1 (part), 37 Stat. 476, related to exclusion of Chinese and persons of Chinese descent from the United States or its Territories, and to various matters pertaining thereto, including the requirement of certificates of permission and identity by those who might be entitled to entry, exemptions, duties of masters of vessels and Federal officers, arrest, hearing and removal of Chinese unlawfully within the United States or its Territories, habeas corpus, and forfeitures and penalties for violation of the exclusion laws.
§298. Omitted
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, acts Mar. 17, 1894, Art. III, 28 Stat. 1211; Apr. 28, 1904, ch. 1762, §1, 33 Stat. 478, provided for the Bertillon system of identification at the various ports of entry, to prevent unlawful entry of Chinese into the United States. It is obsolete in view of the repeal of sections 262 to 297 of this title by act Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §1, 57 Stat. 600. For some years prior to such act, no moneys had been appropriated to prevent unlawful entry of Chinese, referred to in this section.
§299. Repealed. Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §1, 57 Stat. 600
Section, act June 23, 1913, ch. 3, §1, 38 Stat. 65, provided for delivery by the marshal, of all Chinese persons ordered deported under judicial writs, into the custody of any officer designated for that purpose, for conveyance to the frontier or seaboard for deportation.
但是作为一章没有被repeal
CHAPTER 7—EXCLUSION OF CHINESE
Editorial Notes
Codification
Former chapter 7 of this title included the provisions of the several Chinese Exclusion acts, beginning with the temporary act of May 6, 1882, ch. 126, 22 Stat. 58, which, as being then in force, were, by act Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1630, §5, 33 Stat. 428, amending act Apr. 29, 1902, ch. 641, 32 Stat. 176, "re-enacted, extended, and continued, without modification, limitation, or condition;" with the further provisions of the act and those of subsequent acts relating to the subject which remained in force.
§261. Omitted
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, acts Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §7, 32 Stat. 828; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §14, June 10, 1933; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. V, eff. June 14, 1940, 5 F.R. 2423, 54 Stat. 1238, conferred upon the Attorney General the authority, power, and jurisdiction by virtue of any law relating to the exclusion from and residence within the United States, its Territories and the District of Columbia, of Chinese and persons of Chinese descent, and vested in the collectors of customs and collectors of internal revenue, under control of the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, as the Attorney General might designate therefor, the authority, power, and jurisdiction in relation to such exclusion previously vested in such officers. It was omitted as obsolete in view of the repeal, by act Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §1, 57 Stat. 600, of sections 262 to 297 and 299 of this title.
§§262 to 297. Repealed. Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §1, 57 Stat. 600
Sections, acts May 6, 1882, ch. 126, §§1, 3, 6–13, 15, 16, 22 Stat. 59–61; July 5, 1884, ch. 220, 23 Stat. 115–118; Sept. 13, 1888, ch. 1015, §§5–11, 13, 14, 25 Stat. 477–479; Oct. 1, 1888, ch. 1064, §§1, 2, 25 Stat. 504; May 5, 1892, ch. 60, §§1–3, 5–8, 27 Stat. 25, 26; Nov. 3, 1893, ch. 14, §§1, 2, 28 Stat. 7, 8; July 7, 1898, No. 55, §1 (part), 30 Stat. 751; Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §1, 31 Stat. 161; June 6, 1900, ch. 791, §1 (part), 31 Stat. 611; Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 845, §§1–3, 31 Stat. 1093; Apr. 29, 1902, ch. 641, §§1, 2, 4, 32 Stat. 176, 177; Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1630, §5, 33 Stat. 428; Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 355, §1 (part), 37 Stat. 476, related to exclusion of Chinese and persons of Chinese descent from the United States or its Territories, and to various matters pertaining thereto, including the requirement of certificates of permission and identity by those who might be entitled to entry, exemptions, duties of masters of vessels and Federal officers, arrest, hearing and removal of Chinese unlawfully within the United States or its Territories, habeas corpus, and forfeitures and penalties for violation of the exclusion laws.
§298. Omitted
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, acts Mar. 17, 1894, Art. III, 28 Stat. 1211; Apr. 28, 1904, ch. 1762, §1, 33 Stat. 478, provided for the Bertillon system of identification at the various ports of entry, to prevent unlawful entry of Chinese into the United States. It is obsolete in view of the repeal of sections 262 to 297 of this title by act Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §1, 57 Stat. 600. For some years prior to such act, no moneys had been appropriated to prevent unlawful entry of Chinese, referred to in this section.
§299. Repealed. Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §1, 57 Stat. 600
Section, act June 23, 1913, ch. 3, §1, 38 Stat. 65, provided for delivery by the marshal, of all Chinese persons ordered deported under judicial writs, into the custody of any officer designated for that purpose, for conveyance to the frontier or seaboard for deportation.
ferrygao 写了： 2024年 9月 16日 23:32 自信一点 排华法案根本没有被废除了 随时排华 一点问题也没有
甚至在今天，尽管《排华法案》的重要部分早已经被废止，但《美国法典》第8号的第7章仍旧以“排华”字样开头。[41]在法典第8号的15个章节中，第7章是惟一一个完全聚焦于某个特定国籍或种族团体的章节。
#119 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
这个只是作为space holder 保留着。不然每repeal一个法律就需要全部法律重新编号，或者直接删除的话编号上就会有很多空缺，反而让人搞不明白这些空缺到底是遗漏还是根本没有。
#120 Re: 6年前的视频、哈里斯质问卡瓦诺大法官不推翻历史上的排华法案
每一节都可以repeal保留节号，这没问题
第七章作为一章，repeal有什么难度吗？
第七章作为一章，repeal有什么难度吗？
jhe123 写了： 2024年 9月 18日 11:43 这个只是作为space holder 保留着。不然每repeal一个法律就需要全部法律重新编号，或者直接删除的话编号上就会有很多空缺，反而让人搞不明白这些空缺到底是遗漏还是根本没有。