猪党真开始搞独裁了

[HBBH]

即使被判有罪也不能不让参选， 这是宪法的规定。 现在的问题是有人要把宪法当抹布。

Danaus网友，假设一个人犯了罪，检察官收集证据准备起诉，他雇佣律师拖拖拖。这一拖就是五年。

你的意思他完全可以可以参选，上台，坐一任总统？

[Danaides]

Danaus网友，假设一个人犯了罪，检察官收集证据准备起诉，他雇佣律师拖拖拖。这一拖就是五年。

你的意思他完全可以可以参选，上台，坐一任总统？

疑罪从无，这是基本法律常识啊，游海老师。

按你的逻辑，周白在右臂眼里就是贪污犯，是不是一样可以拿掉？

[YouHi]

疑罪从无，这是基本法律常识啊，游海老师。

按你的逻辑，周白在右臂眼里就是贪污犯，是不是一样可以拿掉？

你的意思他完全可以可以参选，上台，坐一任总统？

[HBBH]

即使被判有罪也不能不让参选， 这是宪法的规定。 现在的问题是有人要把宪法当抹布。

你又装作不懂英文？ 你们一提到1.6就High， 人家那时候还是总统。 总统自己叛乱推翻自己？

你的意思他完全可以可以参选，上台，坐一任总统？

[Danaides]

你的意思他完全可以可以参选，上台，坐一任总统？

连NYT的正常左派都看不下去了：

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/29/opin ... dment.html

[fuqiang]

美帝被一帮犹太白左带偏了。党是坏，共和党是蠢。川普被弹劾没有通过就说明没有叛乱。拜登儿子捞好处那是事实，至于拜登有否参与，你们说呢？

[YouHi]

连NYT的正常左派都看不下去了：

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/29/opin ... dment.html

Danaus网友可以正常交流，我就不骂了。这个是op-ed。不是NYT的人，也不是NYT的朋友，谁都可以投稿。我给你看看WaPo的选稿规定：

The Post receives hundreds of submissions a day and on most days can accommodate only a handful of outside contributions in print and online. Among the things we look for are timeliness (is it pegged to something in the news?), resonance (is it something that will interest Post readers?) and freshness of perspective (is it an argument we haven't heard many times before?). You don't need to have special expertise in a topic. But explaining how your background or experience informs your point of view can make for a more effective op-ed. You also don't need to have an important title — and having an important title doesn't mean we'll publish your op-ed. In fact, because we realize that senators, business leaders, heads of state and the like have access to various platforms where they can express their views, we hold them to a particularly high standard when considering whether to publish them in The Post.

https://helpcenter.washingtonpost.com/h ... t-an-op-ed

[HBBH]

宪法在那放着你不看，非要认同猪党违法作弊？ 不让参选就是违法作弊。

Danaus网友可以正常交流，我就不骂了。这个是op-ed。不是NYT的人，也不是NYT的朋友，谁都可以投稿。我给你看看WaPo的选稿规定

[Danaides]

Danaus网友可以正常交流，我就不骂了。这个是op-ed。不是NYT的人，也不是NYT的朋友，谁都可以投稿。我给你看看WaPo的选稿规定：

The Post receives hundreds of submissions a day and on most days can accommodate only a handful of outside contributions in print and online. Among the things we look for are timeliness (is it pegged to something in the news?), resonance (is it something that will interest Post readers?) and freshness of perspective (is it an argument we haven't heard many times before?). You don't need to have special expertise in a topic. But explaining how your background or experience informs your point of view can make for a more effective op-ed. You also don't need to have an important title — and having an important title doesn't mean we'll publish your op-ed. In fact, because we realize that senators, business leaders, heads of state and the like have access to various platforms where they can express their views, we hold them to a particularly high standard when considering whether to publish them in The Post.

https://helpcenter.washingtonpost.com/h ... t-an-op-ed

说的没错，RINO秀秀也在NYT和WaPo写专栏，但是，猪妹从来没有发过川粉的文章，谁都可以投稿不等于谁都能发

[HBBH]

你读懂了下面这个 14th 宪法修正案的历史再来提 “宪政”。

“总统自己叛乱推翻自己”

是推翻宪政，宪政中宪法最大，国会总统最高法院分权

不是总统独大

是推翻下一任选举出的总统

[table]

把j6的录像放出来让全国全世界批判老川煽动，不，武装暴乱啊！

左棍们辱负重真以大局为重真塔玛好人啊，不愧为道德楷模人类精英

[HBBH]

excluded the president.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

[HBBH]

说了你要去了解这个修正案是怎么来的， 最后怎么定的。

难道你把 elector of President 看成参选总统？

这个图贴了十次了， 你就是不看（说你看不懂吧， 但又能贴一大段）。

哪一句说了，excluded the president?

共和党的一贯立场，按宪法原文，不是自己解释

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

[HBBH]

什么东西都有个上下文， 过去称人小姐是尊称， 你能按今天的 “小姐” 去解读民国的 “小姐”？

你是说一般人看不懂宪法？

这个宪法和你解释的宪法不一样？

这不就是你们整天说的，自由派法官解释宪法的方式吗？

你们既然支持按照宪法原文，就不能搞双标，到你们那里就怎么解释都行

[HBBH]

Section Three: 14th Amendment

Section Three of the amendment, gave Congress the authority to bar public officials, who took an oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, from holding office if they "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the Constitution. The intent was to prevent the president from allowing former leaders of the Confederacy to regain power within the U.S. government after securing a presidential pardon. It states that a two-thirds majority vote in Congress is required to allow public officials who had engaged in rebellion to regain the rights of American citizenship and hold government or military office.

[donkeyslayer]

天下左派是一家，普金习核心与民主党，都是同一个师傅，手段也一样

随便禁止没有被定罪的人参加选举，这跟普丁不让反对派参选有啥区别？

到底是谁在搞独裁？？以后可以用任何莫须有指控来禁止不喜欢的人参选？？？


DONALD TRUMP

Trump disqualified from Maine 2024 Republican primary ballot
Maine's Secretary of State disqualified former President Trump from the 2024 ballot

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... ary-ballot

[newIdRobot]

随便禁止没有被定罪的人参加选举，这跟普丁不让反对派参选有啥区别？

到底是谁在搞独裁？？以后可以用任何莫须有指控来禁止不喜欢的人参选？？？


DONALD TRUMP

Trump disqualified from Maine 2024 Republican primary ballot
Maine's Secretary of State disqualified former President Trump from the 2024 ballot

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... ary-ballot

号召选民把川普的名字自己填上去

[newIdRobot]

直接搞暴乱

现在法院不让了

说不民主

民主要在法治之下

你所谓的民主实际上就是专制。

[newIdRobot]

好几个网友觉得1/6是和平示威呢。。。

香港暴乱不就是自由斗士么

[HBBH]

Maine 的根本没有经过法院， 一个极左ACLU 出身的州秘拍脑袋决定的， 就是要制造舆论来污蔑TRUMP。

你所谓的民主实际上就是专制。