I think this is an intuitive outstanding answer, it actually gives out at least one angle of the reasonable view
据说24节气使用两千多年,却没有用365天记年,什么水平?
#21 Re: 据说24节气使用两千多年,却没有用365天记年,什么水平?
#22 Re: 据说24节气使用两千多年,却没有用365天记年,什么水平?
农历是阴阳历 显然比纯阴历和纯阳历高级几条街╭∩╮( ̄▽ ̄)╭∩╮ 写了: 2024年 12月 21日 21:06 I think this is an intuitive outstanding answer, it actually gives out at least one angle of the reasonable view
#23 Re: 据说24节气使用两千多年,却没有用365天记年,什么水平?
if that's the case, then putting "据说" in the title was a right decisionJack12345 写了: 2024年 12月 21日 20:31 中国 古代的24节气 是锚定在农历基础上的,很不准的。
后来 明朝传教士 汤若望等 带来 365天的公历概念,才把24节气 改成 锚定在 公历上的

#24 Re: 据说24节气使用两千多年,却没有用365天记年,什么水平?
I think it's a valuable point, 年 was a beast, to clearly picturizing 年 is rotating a whole circle DOES have conceptual level improvement, huge.
Well without knowing that, the sense of recirculation is still there. Seasons come back again and again, yet the beast returns every 365 days didn't become a formal concept...
ALSO, before 汤若望, before sun-center model, the 365-day calendar has been officially used for long time, right?