谁说以色列会归还被占领土来着？
版主： Softfist
#22 Re: 谁说以色列会归还被占领土来着？
尽管的确曾经是伊斯兰国和基地组织的成员，但是现在朱拉尼（沙拉）领导的沙姆解放组织力求和西方国家缓和关系，把打击基地组织和伊斯兰国作为其优先目标。这自然得到了西方国家的支持和欢迎。
#23 Re: 谁说以色列会归还被占领土来着？
2021年6月1日，前线发布了一部纪录片《圣战者》，该片在持续的叙利亚内战背景下调查了沙拉的过去。 [78]回顾自己过去与基地组织的关系，朱拉尼在采访中评论道：
“我们需要考虑该地区的历史，以及这片土地与过去二三十年间所经历的一切……我们谈论的是一个曾由暴君透过铁腕手段及其安全机构统治的地区。与此同时，该地区正被无数冲突和战争包围……我们不能断章取义这段历史，只说某某加入基地组织。没错成千上万的人加入了基地组织，但我们需要问一问这些人加入基地组织的原因是什么？这才是真正的问题。二战后美国对该地区的政策应否为驱使人们加入基地组织负上部分责任？欧洲在该地区的政策是否镇压那些同情巴勒斯坦抵抗事业的人或“犹太复国主义政权”对待巴勒斯坦人的方式负责任？……谁要为那些不得不忍受在伊拉克或阿富汗所发生的事情，所致破碎和被压迫的人民负责，难道是他们自己吗……？……我们在过去时代有与基地组织合作，但这段合作关系早已结束，我们即使在与其合作时也反对攻击西方，从叙利亚向欧洲或美国人民发动袭击完全违反我们的一贯政策。这（对西方的袭击）根本不在我们的考虑范围内，我们根本没有这么做。” [79]
“我们需要考虑该地区的历史，以及这片土地与过去二三十年间所经历的一切……我们谈论的是一个曾由暴君透过铁腕手段及其安全机构统治的地区。与此同时，该地区正被无数冲突和战争包围……我们不能断章取义这段历史，只说某某加入基地组织。没错成千上万的人加入了基地组织，但我们需要问一问这些人加入基地组织的原因是什么？这才是真正的问题。二战后美国对该地区的政策应否为驱使人们加入基地组织负上部分责任？欧洲在该地区的政策是否镇压那些同情巴勒斯坦抵抗事业的人或“犹太复国主义政权”对待巴勒斯坦人的方式负责任？……谁要为那些不得不忍受在伊拉克或阿富汗所发生的事情，所致破碎和被压迫的人民负责，难道是他们自己吗……？……我们在过去时代有与基地组织合作，但这段合作关系早已结束，我们即使在与其合作时也反对攻击西方，从叙利亚向欧洲或美国人民发动袭击完全违反我们的一贯政策。这（对西方的袭击）根本不在我们的考虑范围内，我们根本没有这么做。” [79]
#25 Re: 谁说以色列会归还被占领土来着？
1974年，在美国的调停下，在UN的监督下，以色列曾经归还了部分戈兰高地领土给叙利亚，这部分领土至今仍在叙利亚控制之下。这也是以色列愿意归还领土的实际证明。
#26 Re: 谁说以色列会归还被占领土来着？
Partial return: In 1974, following the Yom Kippur War and mediated by the US, a disengagement agreement led to Israel returning a narrow demilitarized zone, including the city of Quneitra, to Syrian control. This area is overseen by UN forces.
Israeli occupation: Despite the 1974 agreement, a significant portion of the Golan Heights remains under Israeli control.
Recent developments: Following the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024, Israeli forces took control of the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) buffer zone, stating it was a "temporary defensive position". Israel also conducted military operations in southern Syria. These actions were condemned by the Syrian transitional government and Saudi Arabia.
Current stance: Syria has repeatedly demanded the return of the occupied Golan Heights as a condition for a peace agreement. However, recent reports suggest that Syria may be prioritizing an end to Israeli attacks and security arrangements in the south rather than demanding the immediate return of the Golan in current talks. Israel's Foreign Minister has stated that the Golan will remain part of Israel in any peace agreement.
In summary, while a small portion of the Golan Heights was returned to Syria in 1974, Israel continues to occupy the majority of the territory, and has recently expanded its presence in the border region following the collapse of the Assad regime. The status of the Golan Heights remains a major point of contention between Israel and Syria.
Israeli occupation: Despite the 1974 agreement, a significant portion of the Golan Heights remains under Israeli control.
Recent developments: Following the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024, Israeli forces took control of the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) buffer zone, stating it was a "temporary defensive position". Israel also conducted military operations in southern Syria. These actions were condemned by the Syrian transitional government and Saudi Arabia.
Current stance: Syria has repeatedly demanded the return of the occupied Golan Heights as a condition for a peace agreement. However, recent reports suggest that Syria may be prioritizing an end to Israeli attacks and security arrangements in the south rather than demanding the immediate return of the Golan in current talks. Israel's Foreign Minister has stated that the Golan will remain part of Israel in any peace agreement.
In summary, while a small portion of the Golan Heights was returned to Syria in 1974, Israel continues to occupy the majority of the territory, and has recently expanded its presence in the border region following the collapse of the Assad regime. The status of the Golan Heights remains a major point of contention between Israel and Syria.