#21 Re: AGI教
发表于 ： 2025年 7月 24日 13:45
Satya和小扎应该都是足够聪明，Ride the Wave。就像股市，好股未必挣钱，妖股在泡沫破裂前能让你挣大钱。
对Sam Altman的评价，相信Elon即可。
对Sam Altman的评价，相信Elon即可。
Satya和小扎应该都是足够聪明，Ride the Wave。就像股市，好股未必挣钱，妖股在泡沫破裂前能让你挣大钱。
第三点问题最大，特别是比较特殊的，training data比较少的问题。本人自己试验过，有的看似复杂的数学问题，LLM会解决，估计还是有不少training data，而很多很简单的数学问题都搞错，LLM自己还不知道搞错了。wmysh 写了： 2025年 7月 22日 17:31 https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/maybe-ai-i ... -after-all
Let's summarize AI's fundamental weaknesses:
1. AI doesn't actually "read" the entire collection of texts. In human terms, it gets "bored" and stops once it has enough to generate a credible response.
2. AI has digital dementia. It doesn't necessarily remember what you asked for in the past nor does it necessarily remember its previous responses to the same queries.
3. AI is fundamentally, irrevocably untrustworthy. It makes errors that it doesn't detect (because it didn't actually "read" the entire trove of text) and it generates responses that are "good enough," meaning they're not 100% accurate, but they have the superficial appearance of being comprehensive and therefore acceptable. This is the "shoot from the hip" response Ian described.