#41 Re: ice是非法移民都抓光了么，怎么开始搞有签证/绿卡的了
发表于 ： 2025年 3月 26日 22:41
尼玛 下一个就是你
尼玛 下一个就是你
贵职业说谎者请明示那一句支持哈马斯Yellen 写了： 2025年 3月 26日 17:20 沐屎淋搅屎棍，拿F-1的绿猪还支持蛤蟆死。直接扔进大西洋最合适。
母猪写的
Op-ed: Try again, President Kumar: Renewing calls for Tufts to adopt March 4 TCU Senate resolutions
On March 4, the Tufts Community Union Senate passed 3 out of 4 resolutions demanding that the University acknowledge the Palestinian genocide, apologize for University President Sunil Kumar’s statements, disclose its investments and divest from companies with direct or indirect ties to Israel. These resolutions were the product of meaningful debate by the Senate and represent a sincere effort to hold Israel accountable for clear violations of international law. Credible accusations against Israel include accounts of deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians and plausible genocide.
Unfortunately, the University’s response to the Senate resolutions has been wholly inadequate and dismissive of the Senate, the collective voice of the student body. Graduate Students for Palestine joins Tufts Students for Justice in Palestine, the Tufts Faculty and Staff Coalition for Ceasefire and Fletcher Students for Palestine to reject the University’s response. Although graduate students were not allowed by the University into the Senate meeting, which lasted for almost eight hours, our presence on campus and financial entanglement with the University via tuition payments and the graduate work that we do on grants and research makes us direct stakeholders in the University’s stance.
While an argument may be made that the University should not take political stances and should focus on research and intellectual exchange, the automatic rejection, dismissive nature and condescending tone in the University’s statement have caused us to question whether the University is indeed taking a stand against its own declared commitments to free speech, assembly and democratic expression. According to the Student Code of Conduct, “[a]ctive citizenship, including exercising free speech and engaging in protests, gatherings, and demonstrations, is a vital part of the Tufts community.” In addition, the Dean of Students Office has written, “[w]hile at times the exchange of controversial ideas and opinions may cause discomfort or even distress, our mission as a university is to promote critical thinking, the rigorous examination and discussion of facts and theories, and diverse and sometimes contradictory ideas and opinions.” Why then is the University discrediting and disregarding its students who practice the very ideals of critical thinking, intellectual exchange and civic engagement that Tufts claims to represent?
The role of the TCU Senate resolutions is abundantly clear. The Senate’s resolutions serve as a “strong lobbying tool that expresses to the Tufts administration the wants and needs of the student body. They speak as a collective voice and are instrumental in enacting systemic changes.” In this case, the “systemic changes” that the collective voice of the student body is calling for are for the University to end its complicity with Israel insofar as it is oppressing the Palestinian people and denying their right to self-determination — a right that is guaranteed by international law. These strong lobbying tools are all the more urgent now given the order by the International Court of Justice confirming that the Palestinian people of Gaza’s rights under the Genocide Convention are under a “plausible” risk of being breached.
This collective student voice is not without precedent. Today, the University may remember with pride its decision in February 1989 to divest from South Africa under apartheid and end its complicity with the then-racist regime. However, we must remember that the University divested up to 11 years after some of its peers. For instance, the Michigan State University Board of Regents passed resolutions to end its complicity with Apartheid South Africa as early as 1978. Had Tufts heeded the call of the student movement in the late 1970s, the University could have been on the right side of history sooner.
We reject any attempt by the University or the Office of the President to summarily dismiss the role of the Senate and mischaracterize its resolution as divisive. The open and free debate demonstrated by the Senate process (exemplified by the length, open notice and substantive exchange in the proceedings and the non-passing of one of the proposed resolutions), together with the serious organizing efforts of students, warrant credible self-reflection by the Office of the President and the University. We, as graduate students, affirm the equal dignity and humanity of all people and reject the University’s mischaracterization of the Senate’s efforts.
The great author and civil rights champion James Baldwin once wrote: “The paradox of education is precisely this: that as one begins to become conscious one begins to examine the society in which [they are] being educated.” As an educator, President Kumar should embrace efforts by students to evaluate “diverse and sometimes contradictory ideas and opinions.” Furthermore, the president should trust in the Senate’s rigorous and democratic process and the resolutions that it has achieved.
We urge President Kumar and the Tufts administration to meaningfully engage with and actualize the resolutions passed by the Senate.
This op-ed was written by Nick Ambeliotis (CEE, ‘25), Fatima Rahman (STEM Education, ‘27), Genesis Perez (English, ‘27) and Rumeysa Ozturk (CSHD, ‘25) and is endorsed by 32 other Tufts School of Engineering and Arts and Sciences Graduate Students.
少他妈咧咧，SourSweetTea 写了： 2025年 3月 26日 22:39 我之前也说这个道理，抗议政府和打砸私产是两个级别的问题
政府本来服务人民，人民不满为什么不能去抗议
政府应该想着怎么保护老百姓私人财产安全
到了民主党这里，官老爷命比老百姓重要
这和封建社会有什么区别
只许州官放火，不许百姓点灯
民主党就是一群伪君子
少他妈咧咧，SOD 写了： 2025年 3月 27日 00:30 少他妈咧咧，
如果一般政府财产，还可以狡辩一下，实际上也都是老百姓纳税
这些恶臭玩意是给议会门口开了绞刑架，打砸抢
全世界达到这么恶劣的畜生就是纳粹和铲逼
7H12$F+vu 写了： 2025年 3月 26日 20:28 还两手抓，骗鬼呢。要是真的遣返人数大大超过往届政府，那还有点可信度，现在遣返的还不如奥黑驴政府(黑驴还没花这么多钱)，也敢大言不惭两手抓。
不知道是政府里哪个白痴出的主意，也就是糊弄你们好骗的，遣返的不比往届政府多，却用争议很大的审查合法移民来转移注意力，争论起来后，遣返不力的罪名就安到对手身上，自己不用干活，还能甩政治对手一身脏水。只是我们纳税人再次受骗，过去花钱帮助难民，现在花钱赶人，人没赶走多少，钱花的海量，口水仗也是一地。
立此存照，你承认拜登放进来两三千万非移。7H12$F+vu 写了： 2025年 3月 26日 21:07 这就是我说的，挑起争论后，遣返不力的罪名就甩到对手身上了。至于做的怎么样，不管。
就算没头脑，你用屁股想想，现在有多少非遗？两三千万啊！人数比奥巴马时代多好多倍了，十几个人里就能抓一个，结果还干不过往届政府？？？就算民主党阻挠，他能阻挠几千万个案子吗？就算他阻挠的你都抓不到，还是有两三千万的可以抓。然后你告诉我，还抓不过往届政府？？？？这借口蹩脚到傻逼都骗不过啊！！！！
还不谈蘑菇头已经一统江湖，白宫国会高院一把抓了。这么大的权力，办起事来还被人到处阻挠？？奥巴马时代共和党就不阻挠了？？？人家可没这么大权力，还没那么多非遗可以抓。
真是不怕不识货，就怕货比货。跟奥黑驴相比，蘑菇头要么笨的不如驴，要么故意pick fight 不干活。又笨又不干活，还要花海量的钱，纳税人的钱就这么被浪费的。
现在非法入境的人数比睡舅时期少多了，pick fight的其实是你7H12$F+vu 写了： 2025年 3月 26日 15:41 这就是我最烦蘑菇头的一点，我之前就曾指出过，他只嘴上说，实际上不做，却专门pick fight.
嘴上说要遣返罪犯，实际做的不比白等多，钱却花的海了去了，还说白等浪费钱。明明那么多罪犯还等着遣返，却转身搞合法的去了，现在还扩大到要审查言论。打一起又一起的官司，时间精力金钱都浪费到pick fight 上面了。
你把该抓该送走的都干完再去审查啊，你不干活专门找麻烦的吗？？？你要找麻烦，别花纳税人的钱，自己掏钱啊！
我寻思她在美国也没支持德州独立或者加州独立，除非你认为加沙也是美国领土？
你这句话是没有道理的。因为打击非法移民的行动可以减少非法入境，这是打击非法移民带来的，不是你打击合法移民的效果。把参加葬礼定义为恐怖主义，对减少非法入境并无帮助。所以你为什么不专注于打击非法移民（你做的并没有奥巴马多），而是要审查人家参加葬礼呢？
你的意思就是说Hamas里面的人只有不开枪都是自由的移民喽？7H12$F+vu 写了： 2025年 3月 27日 12:01 你这句话是没有道理的。因为打击非法移民的行动可以减少非法入境，这是打击非法移民带来的，不是你打击合法移民的效果。把参加葬礼定义为恐怖主义，对减少非法入境并无帮助。所以你为什么不专注于打击非法移民（你做的并没有奥巴马多），而是要审查人家参加葬礼呢？
我指出的是蘑菇头做的不够，因为他遣返的并不比前任奥巴马多，却转向审查合法人员。他应该专注于非法入境的罪犯，不是花大钱去搞合法人员，他如果想整合法移民，应该自己花钱，美国没有多余的钱给他浪费。
你不同意加大力度打击非法人员吗？
不要把打击非法移民与其他事情混为一谈，我不知道你是反对打击非法移民，还是要去打击哈马斯。SourSweetTea 写了： 2025年 3月 27日 12:10 你的意思就是说Hamas里面的人只有不开枪都是自由的移民喽？
美国连CCP的签证都要卡或者拒呢，这也不是无中生有，你怎么知道党员干了损害美国的事情，党员到美国0元购了，还是烧Tesla了
移民权利本来就在行政里面，有理由怀疑你和恐怖分子有联系，起诉你需要证据，遣送不需要
中国人申请签证的时候还不是预先认为你有移民倾向，那岂不是也是美国政府不对？
你再给恐怖分子组织spin，你都快成hamas了
现在不就是移民局在遣返和Hamas真主党有联系或者潜在有联系的非美国公民7H12$F+vu 写了： 2025年 3月 27日 12:15 不要把打击非法移民与其他事情混为一谈，我不知道你是反对打击非法移民，还是要去打击哈马斯。
我假设你要求打击哈马斯，我理解你的想法，我也不喜欢他们，不过他们没有袭击美国本土，美国不是参战方，美国人民没有义务替你花钱替你打仗。你可以自己去中东参战，你可以自己去捐款，我并不反对。
我反对政府动用公权力审查合法人员，但对遣返非法人员却不积极。他花了远比奥巴马多的钱，就应该清除远比奥巴马时代更多的非法移民。
那你要问Biden了，上个四年用公权力查了聚聚多少次了7H12$F+vu 写了： 2025年 3月 27日 13:16 我反对政府动用公权力审查合法人员，但对遣返非法人员却不积极。他花了远比奥巴马多的钱，就应该清除远比奥巴马时代更多的非法移民。
美国人民选蘑菇头是让他去对付非法和罪犯的，不是让他搞合法移民的。蘑菇头如果想整人，可以自己花钱去干，想打哈马斯，自己去当雇佣兵也行。但他的工作是大力清除非法移民与罪犯。他必须首先做好工作。
你始终把合法的外国人当作花钱的理由，这简直是蛀虫。我们要求的是清除非法的人。美国没有多余的钱给你浪费。