开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
版主: lexian
#41 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
自信一点,这种路障型开发绝对是赶着投胎
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#42 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
美国大路上一堆开的像爬一样的7老80的老年司机,还有新手司机。交规这种东西,不但保护那些自以为牛逼的神赛车手,也保护这些慢慢开不违反交规的慢手。都是慢手,只要不违反交通规则,不会出事。都是赛车手,恐怕不行。
#43 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
自信一点,路障式开法都是作死。比如当年德州特地花钱请人研究红灯拍照对交通安全的影响。结果统计表明自从有了红灯拍照,交通路口车祸增加了90%。其中一多半都是lz这种压线刹车,被后车T-bone当街撞死的都一堆。所以后来texas就把红灯拍照用立法禁止了
shanghaibaba 写了: 2025年 6月 4日 21:46 美国大路上一堆开的像爬一样的7老80的老年司机,还有新手司机。交规这种东西,不但保护那些自以为牛逼的神赛车手,也保护这些慢慢开不违反交规的慢手。都是慢手,只要不违反交通规则,不会出事。都是赛车手,恐怕不行。
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#44 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
照你的描述,红灯时正好停在白线后,说明你如果刹车踩弱一点,你和后车都会在黄灯的时候进入路口,然后左转完全没问题,因为进入路口的车有优先权。哪怕保守一点,皮卡过不去,你肯定是可以左转过去的。Spike123 写了: 2025年 6月 3日 11:37 感觉今天上午死里逃生,开车在一个小上坡附近左转,接近路口时看见黄灯了,后面车离我挺远,而且对面下山车飕飕的,就踩了一脚刹车红灯时正好停在白线后。我刚停下就听见喇叭不断,后视镜里一辆福特皮卡高速向我冲了过来,最后一秒白皮司机一个急转从我右边蹭了过去,一边破口大骂一边急速闯红灯左转,后车斗里的东西都飞起来,掉了几样小金属到马路上。尼玛感情洪波看见黄灯下意识反应是猛踩油门,根本不看前车的刹车灯。
所以皮卡嫌你开车肉,也没错,因为你这属于完全可以过去的情况,但你选择不过去。
x1

#45 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
我不相信你这种随口一张说的东西。要谈研究,请贴来源。赖美豪中 写了: 2025年 6月 4日 21:49 自信一点,路障式开法都是作死。比如当年德州特地花钱请人研究红灯拍照对交通安全的影响。结果统计表明自从有了红灯拍照,交通路口车祸增加了90%。其中一多半都是lz这种压线刹车,被后车T-bone当街撞死的都一堆。所以后来texas就把红灯拍照用立法禁止了
#46 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
他不是直行,是左转,左转还要看对方来车。如果对方来车比较多,空子比较小,他选择不过去,很正常吧?ShuiNi 写了: 2025年 6月 4日 21:51 照你的描述,红灯时正好停在白线后,说明你如果刹车踩弱一点,你和后车都会在黄灯的时候进入路口,然后左转完全没问题,因为进入路口的车有优先权。哪怕保守一点,皮卡过不去,你肯定是可以左转过去的。
所以皮卡嫌你开车肉,也没错,因为你这属于完全可以过去的情况,但你选择不过去。
#47 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
google ai给你的答案
In 2019, Texas banned red light cameras, citing concerns that they caused more rear-end accidents than they reduced, and that they might violate due process rights. While studies have shown that red light cameras reduce T-bone collisions, the ban was largely driven by the belief that the cameras' presence led drivers to brake suddenly, increasing the risk of rear-end crashes.
Here's a more detailed look at the situation:
Arguments for the Ban:
Increased Rear-End Accidents:
Opponents of red light cameras argued that the cameras caused drivers to brake hard as the light turned, leading to a higher incidence of rear-end collisions.
Constitutional Concerns:
Some legal scholars questioned whether red light cameras violated the right to due process because they didn't allow drivers the opportunity to confront their accuser.
Lack of Positive Impact:
Opponents claimed that the cameras didn't demonstrably improve road safety and that the focus on revenue from fines was a negative aspect.
Arguments Against the Ban:
Reduced T-Bone Accidents:
.
Proponents of red light cameras emphasized that they effectively reduced right-angle ("T-bone") collisions at intersections.
Revenue Generation:
.
Red light cameras provided a source of revenue for cities and the state through traffic fines.
Texas Law:
In 2019, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed a bill into law that banned red light cameras throughout the state.
The new law prevents local authorities from installing or operating red light camera systems.
The law also prohibits the use of evidence obtained from red light camera systems in Texas courts.
There were exceptions for cities that had contracts with red light camera vendors before the ban, allowing them to continue operating the cameras until the contract's expiration.
Overall:
The ban on red light cameras in Texas was driven by a combination of concerns about safety, constitutional rights, and the potential for revenue generation. The debate highlighted the complexities of traffic safety and the potential unintended consequences of implementing new enforcement methods.
In 2019, Texas banned red light cameras, citing concerns that they caused more rear-end accidents than they reduced, and that they might violate due process rights. While studies have shown that red light cameras reduce T-bone collisions, the ban was largely driven by the belief that the cameras' presence led drivers to brake suddenly, increasing the risk of rear-end crashes.
Here's a more detailed look at the situation:
Arguments for the Ban:
Increased Rear-End Accidents:
Opponents of red light cameras argued that the cameras caused drivers to brake hard as the light turned, leading to a higher incidence of rear-end collisions.
Constitutional Concerns:
Some legal scholars questioned whether red light cameras violated the right to due process because they didn't allow drivers the opportunity to confront their accuser.
Lack of Positive Impact:
Opponents claimed that the cameras didn't demonstrably improve road safety and that the focus on revenue from fines was a negative aspect.
Arguments Against the Ban:
Reduced T-Bone Accidents:
.
Proponents of red light cameras emphasized that they effectively reduced right-angle ("T-bone") collisions at intersections.
Revenue Generation:
.
Red light cameras provided a source of revenue for cities and the state through traffic fines.
Texas Law:
In 2019, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed a bill into law that banned red light cameras throughout the state.
The new law prevents local authorities from installing or operating red light camera systems.
The law also prohibits the use of evidence obtained from red light camera systems in Texas courts.
There were exceptions for cities that had contracts with red light camera vendors before the ban, allowing them to continue operating the cameras until the contract's expiration.
Overall:
The ban on red light cameras in Texas was driven by a combination of concerns about safety, constitutional rights, and the potential for revenue generation. The debate highlighted the complexities of traffic safety and the potential unintended consequences of implementing new enforcement methods.
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#48 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
左转是人家的应急反应,因为被lz这个路障挡住了,直线冲可能会被t-bone,左转可以争取一点时间。所以人家的车技才是正常的
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#49 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
哥们,再读一下。感谢你发帖支持我的观点。赖美豪中 写了: 2025年 6月 4日 21:54 google ai给你的答案
In 2019, Texas banned red light cameras, citing concerns that they caused more rear-end accidents than they reduced, and that they might violate due process rights. While studies have shown that red light cameras reduce T-bone collisions, the ban was largely driven by the belief that the cameras' presence led drivers to brake suddenly, increasing the risk of rear-end crashes.
Here's a more detailed look at the situation:
Arguments for the Ban:
Increased Rear-End Accidents:
Opponents of red light cameras argued that the cameras caused drivers to brake hard as the light turned, leading to a higher incidence of rear-end collisions.
Constitutional Concerns:
Some legal scholars questioned whether red light cameras violated the right to due process because they didn't allow drivers the opportunity to confront their accuser.
Lack of Positive Impact:
Opponents claimed that the cameras didn't demonstrably improve road safety and that the focus on revenue from fines was a negative aspect.
Arguments Against the Ban:
Reduced T-Bone Accidents:
.
Proponents of red light cameras emphasized that they effectively reduced right-angle ("T-bone") collisions at intersections.
Revenue Generation:
.
Red light cameras provided a source of revenue for cities and the state through traffic fines.
Texas Law:
In 2019, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed a bill into law that banned red light cameras throughout the state.
The new law prevents local authorities from installing or operating red light camera systems.
The law also prohibits the use of evidence obtained from red light camera systems in Texas courts.
There were exceptions for cities that had contracts with red light camera vendors before the ban, allowing them to continue operating the cameras until the contract's expiration.
Overall:
The ban on red light cameras in Texas was driven by a combination of concerns about safety, constitutional rights, and the potential for revenue generation. The debate highlighted the complexities of traffic safety and the potential unintended consequences of implementing new enforcement methods.
#51 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
自信一点,fake studies被人批的体无完肤,没有任何统计证明red light camera减少t-bone
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#53 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
正是因为是左转,所以在有对向来车的情况下,他可以开过stop line, 在路口中央等待。这时候因为路口变灯,所以对向来车肯定会停下来,这时候赶快左转开出路口即可。我学交规的时候就是这么讲的,除非是那种复杂的大路口,需要依照左转信号灯指示。
他没有选择开到路口里面等,而是在线后等待,这样做实际上降低了左转的通行效率。因为变灯的时候是可以左转2-3辆车的。
x1

#54 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
这是当年house听证会上的数据,当然记者不会报道。因为直接影响了city的revenue.
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#55 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
黄灯前刹车绝对是送命型开法。正确的开法要么你就很早刹车表明你不赶时间,让别的车先走。我对intersection处理一贯是不管啥灯尽快开上去排队或者通过路口。就算多等一会能多玩会手机也好。最垃圾的开发就是松油门浪过去
ShuiNi 写了: 2025年 6月 4日 22:03 正是因为是左转,所以在有对向来车的情况下,他可以开过stop line, 在路口中央等待。这时候因为路口变灯,所以对向来车肯定会停下来,这时候赶快左转开出路口即可。我学交规的时候就是这么讲的,除非是那种复杂的大路口,需要依照左转信号灯指示。
他没有选择开到路口里面等,而是在线后等待,这样做实际上降低了左转的通行效率。因为变灯的时候是可以左转2-3辆车的。
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#56 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
严格地说,对面来车很多一直要等到变红灯才能左转的话,只能转一个车。第二第三个多半会阻碍左右各方向的交通。有时我们等红灯变绿可以直行了,横向右边连续两三个车慢悠悠的左转过来,就是这种情况ShuiNi 写了: 2025年 6月 4日 22:03 正是因为是左转,所以在有对向来车的情况下,他可以开过stop line, 在路口中央等待。这时候因为路口变灯,所以对向来车肯定会停下来,这时候赶快左转开出路口即可。我学交规的时候就是这么讲的,除非是那种复杂的大路口,需要依照左转信号灯指示。
他没有选择开到路口里面等,而是在线后等待,这样做实际上降低了左转的通行效率。因为变灯的时候是可以左转2-3辆车的。
换句话说,在路口等对面方向的空隙左转,只能出去一个车
x1

上次由 rotvap 在 2025年 6月 4日 22:13 修改。
#57 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
他如果在红灯到来之前进入路口,那当然可以在路中间等。但他如果认为他过不了路口,那么停在线内也是一个合理操作。ShuiNi 写了: 2025年 6月 4日 22:03 正是因为是左转,所以在有对向来车的情况下,他可以开过stop line, 在路口中央等待。这时候因为路口变灯,所以对向来车肯定会停下来,这时候赶快左转开出路口即可。我学交规的时候就是这么讲的,除非是那种复杂的大路口,需要依照左转信号灯指示。
他没有选择开到路口里面等,而是在线后等待,这样做实际上降低了左转的通行效率。因为变灯的时候是可以左转2-3辆车的。
#59 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
不愿意或者不敢冲黄灯的原因很多 有可能SB行人在过马路,赖美豪中 写了: 2025年 6月 4日 22:07 黄灯前刹车绝对是送命型开法。正确的开法要么你就很早刹车表明你不赶时间,让别的车先走。我对intersection处理一贯是不管啥灯尽快开上去排队或者通过路口。就算多等一会能多玩会手机也好。最垃圾的开发就是松油门浪过去
同样也有不愿停黄灯的,比如可能车上装了无法固定的重物
开车第一原则:其他司机都是疯子,都是傻逼
上次由 rotvap 在 2025年 6月 4日 22:27 修改。
#60 Re: 开皮卡的红脖子就是公路上的祸害
若干年前有一次停在红灯上,绿灯开车了后,忽然边上窜出一个小货车,老黑司机,很客气的和我说,他的车子重,不容易刹住,差点撞到我的车,叫我下次尽量过黄灯。
后来我很注意,尽量过黄灯,特别是后边是大货车的情况下,导致两次被警察抓到说我闯红灯,罚款。运气不好,警察正好在另一个路口。
后来我很注意,尽量过黄灯,特别是后边是大货车的情况下,导致两次被警察抓到说我闯红灯,罚款。运气不好,警察正好在另一个路口。