Trump的人在 60minutes 节目上说, 武汉病毒所3名研究人员曾于2019年11月住院就医,症状与新冠病毒感染一致。
只不过当中方多次要求公布这3人的姓名后, 就尿遁了, 没人再提了。
版主: Softfist
tywodx 写了: 2022年 11月 1日 12:18 感觉很奇怪,这事本来已经消停了好一阵,现在又重提?兔子指控老美的实验室和电子烟肺炎可不是随便说说而已,是有料的,而且这次大毛在二毛缴获了大批材料,真要闹起来可说不好谁是输家
laojin 写了: 2022年 11月 1日 10:51 这个报告尽扯些无关的事情,例如武汉病毒所2019年换空调啊,买焚烧炉啊。。。
最后结论
As noted by the WHO Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens, the COVID-
19 Lancet Commission, and the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence 90-Day Assessment on
the COVID-19 Origins, more information is needed to arrive at a more precise, if not a definitive,
understanding of the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and how the COVID-19 pandemic began.225 Governments,
leaders, public health officials, and scientists involved in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic and working
to prevent future pandemics, must commit to greater transparency, engagement, and responsibility in their
efforts.
Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that
the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New
information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However,
the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption
of accuracy. The following are critical outstanding questions that would need to be addressed to be able to
more definitively conclude the origins of SARS-CoV-2:
What is the intermediate host species for SARS-CoV-2? Where did it first infect humans?
Where is SARS-CoV-2’s viral reservoir?
How did SARS-CoV-2 acquire its unique genetic features, such as its furin cleavage site?
Advocates of a zoonotic origin theory must provide clear and convincing evidence that a natural
zoonotic spillover is the source of the pandemic, as was demonstrated for the 2002-2004 SARS outbreak.
In other words, there needs to be verifiable evidence that a natural zoonotic spillover actually occurred, not
simply that such a spillover could have occurred.
出现时基因比sars集中,是因为发现的比sars早啊,很正常。ambastrong 写了: 2022年 11月 1日 10:18 https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/d ... 102722.pdf
说病毒出来的时候很聚焦,就在武汉,而且基因很集中,没有变异的谱系,跟SARS不一样,不像从自然届来的。还把那段时间的搜索引擎记录翻出来了
总之对中国很不友好。
chace 写了: 2022年 11月 1日 12:47 Republican Senate staff tout lab-leak theory of the pandemic’s origin
Report cites circumstantial evidence and suspicious patterns
https://www.science.org/content/article ... ics-origin
在Science杂志的眼里, 这个参议院的报告也是个笑话!