微软量子纠错编码取得突破进展

STEM版,合并数学,物理,化学,科学,工程,机械。不包括生物、医学相关,和计算机相关内容。

版主: verdeliteTlexander

回复
Caravel楼主
论坛支柱
论坛支柱
Caravel 的博客
帖子: 12309
注册时间: 7月 24, 2022, 5:21 pm

#1 微软量子纠错编码取得突破进展

帖子 Caravel楼主 »

30个物理比特组成4个逻辑比特,逻辑比特错误率比物理比特下降800倍

Microsoft and Quantinuum said they had made a breakthrough in that field. Microsoft applied an error-correction algorithm that it wrote to Quantinuum's physical qubits, yielding about four reliable qubits from 30 physical ones.

Jason Zander, Microsoft's executive vice president for strategic missions and technologies, said the company believes that is the best ratio of reliable qubits from a quantum chip that has ever been shown.

"We ran more than 14,000 individual experiments without a single error. That's up to 800 times better than anything on record," Zander told Reuters in an interview.
FoxMe
著名点评
著名点评
帖子: 3276
注册时间: 7月 26, 2022, 4:46 pm
昵称(选填): 令狐

#2 Re: 微软量子纠错编码取得突破进展

帖子 FoxMe »

这种“突破”很多,但是量子计算还是遥遥无期,不知道泡沫何时破灭。
forecasting
著名写手
著名写手
帖子: 314
注册时间: 4月 17, 2023, 8:26 am

#3 Re: 微软量子纠错编码取得突破进展

帖子 forecasting »

FoxMe 写了: 4月 4, 2024, 5:29 pm 这种“突破”很多,但是量子计算还是遥遥无期,不知道泡沫何时破灭。
看到你回复才进来的。这些新闻都是那帮做量子计算的为了忽悠老板才弄出来的,丢人。
Caravel楼主
论坛支柱
论坛支柱
Caravel 的博客
帖子: 12309
注册时间: 7月 24, 2022, 5:21 pm

#4 Re: 微软量子纠错编码取得突破进展

帖子 Caravel楼主 »

FoxMe 写了: 4月 4, 2024, 5:29 pm 这种“突破”很多,但是量子计算还是遥遥无期,不知道泡沫何时破灭。
我觉的是实打实的进步,引力波花了多少年才成功?low hanging food都做完了,下面都是硬骨头
头像
pseudo
见习点评
见习点评
帖子: 1543
注册时间: 7月 28, 2022, 10:04 am
昵称(选填): small man

#5 Re: 微软量子纠错编码取得突破进展

帖子 pseudo »

Caravel 写了: 4月 4, 2024, 1:30 am 30个物理比特组成4个逻辑比特,逻辑比特错误率比物理比特下降800倍

Microsoft and Quantinuum said they had made a breakthrough in that field. Microsoft applied an error-correction algorithm that it wrote to Quantinuum's physical qubits, yielding about four reliable qubits from 30 physical ones.

Jason Zander, Microsoft's executive vice president for strategic missions and technologies, said the company believes that is the best ratio of reliable qubits from a quantum chip that has ever been shown.

"We ran more than 14,000 individual experiments without a single error. That's up to 800 times better than anything on record," Zander told Reuters in an interview.
不明白为什么是800倍,从信息论角度不对呀。

假设32个物理比特组成4个逻辑比特(比30个更好些),平均每8个物理比特一个逻辑比特。那么错误率可以下降2^8=256倍。
回复

回到 “STEM”