1. AI doesn't actually "read" the entire collection of texts. In human terms, it gets "bored" and stops once it has enough to generate a credible response.
2. AI has digital dementia. It doesn't necessarily remember what you asked for in the past nor does it necessarily remember its previous responses to the same queries.
3. AI is fundamentally, irrevocably untrustworthy. It makes errors that it doesn't detect (because it didn't actually "read" the entire trove of text) and it generates responses that are "good enough," meaning they're not 100% accurate, but they have the superficial appearance of being comprehensive and therefore acceptable. This is the "shoot from the hip" response Ian described.
#3 Re: AGI教
发表于 : 2025年 7月 22日 17:33
由 cover
我最先说的,这波AI泡沫就是刷题
利用磁盘空间的计算的进步,把题目特征和解法刷题近神经网络,存储下来
这样做法,差不多20年了吧,和人脑是背道而驰
#4 Re: AGI教
发表于 : 2025年 7月 22日 17:36
由 wmysh
我很期待高盛用AI写代码的结局如何。
#5 Re: AGI教
发表于 : 2025年 7月 22日 17:42
由 abovetherim
As cited in his 2013 blog, Sam Altman stated, "Successful people build companies, more successful people build countries, the most successful people build religions". He then reflected on this, saying, "It appears to me that the best way to build a religion is actually to build a company" 窝草,那这货的所有言行都能完美解释了,呵呵。
Thanks for the intro. Reading her book "Empire of AI". She is obviously a liberal socialist. But AI religion has become the opposite extremism. Not easy to strike a balance.