分页: 1 / 1

#1 维修费用如果大于50%新的价格,就应该更换

发表于 : 2025年 8月 14日 16:16
noktard

that’s a widely used guideline, often called the “50% Rule” in home maintenance.

The logic:

If the cost to repair an item is more than half the cost of replacing it new, it’s usually better financially (and often functionally) to replace.

This also assumes the item is past the halfway point of its expected lifespan.

Why it works:

Better value long-term – Repairs on older items often lead to more repairs soon after.

Efficiency gains – Newer models are usually more energy- or water-efficient, lowering utility costs.

Warranty advantage – Replacement restarts your warranty period; repairs usually don’t.

Example applications:

Appliances – Fridge, washer, dryer, dishwasher.

Fixtures – Toilets, faucets, garbage disposals.

Tools – Power tools, vacuums, lawn mowers.

Exceptions:

Items with high sentimental value (e.g., antique furniture).

Rare or high-end products where new replacements are much more expensive than repair.

Situations where the repair is a one-time fix that restores full function for years.

💡 For most household goods, you can combine the 50% cost rule with a 50% lifespan rule — if it’s more than halfway through its expected lifespan and the repair costs over half of new, replacement is the smart move.

When 30% makes sense:

The item is already past 70% of its expected lifespan.

The model is outdated and inefficient.

Parts are hard to find or expensive.

You value newer features or design upgrade


#2 Re: 维修费用如果大于50%新的价格,就应该更换

发表于 : 2025年 8月 16日 13:29
F150

有道理


#3 Re: 维修费用如果大于50%新的价格,就应该更换

发表于 : 2025年 8月 16日 13:32
Crocodile

我有个白人同事,把旧房子全面翻修,花费接近重造。
我问为啥不重造,答曰,新房还是会变旧房的。
尤其新房子大多用的材料很差,不像老房子真材实料


#4 Re: 维修费用如果大于50%新的价格,就应该更换

发表于 : 2025年 8月 18日 20:37
noktard
Crocodile 写了: 2025年 8月 16日 13:32

我有个白人同事,把旧房子全面翻修,花费接近重造。
我问为啥不重造,答曰,新房还是会变旧房的。
尤其新房子大多用的材料很差,不像老房子真材实料

这个符合exception 里的sentimental value


#5 Re: 维修费用如果大于50%新的价格,就应该更换

发表于 : 2025年 8月 19日 18:15
zmz123

哪有不变的规则,都要看具体情况
比如家的洗衣机在地下室一个角落,左拐右拐,上下各种楼梯才能运送,就不符合你这个定律