美国报社The Intercept的美女Investigative journalist主编给华人受政府迫害的SB华人写了个头版头条的报道。快来看SB华人怎么被政府搞吧
发表于 ： 2022年 12月 26日 10:30
Mara主编是个Investigative journalist. 她的推特如下。
Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing. An investigative journalist may spend months or years researching and preparing a report. Practitioners sometimes use the terms "watchdog reporting" or "accountability reporting."
搬运工完成啦～结尾的 winds through, 我觉得特别特别特别的好笑啊！美国的法律怎么跟儿戏一样～个人可以这么的被司法肆意任意恶意欺负，真是让人目瞪口呆哈！平安夜快乐，圣诞节快乐，enjoy your 小黄人‘a life in the USA!
Chen’s hopes now center on the judge dismissing the case. But she is clear-eyed about Yu’s chances. “The success rate is very low,” she said, adding, “I don’t know why the government has invested so much on us. We are just normal people.”
Meanwhile, in August, Analog Devices finally filed a civil lawsuit against Yu. By the time it winds through the courts, he may be in federal prison.
放在National security 分类底下，觉得好黑色幽默啊！
主编是个小有名气的美女主编，真是人美心善，在上海待过多年，为多个被迫害的华人发声。
俺retweet了一下。顺便打赏了报社。这样的主编和报社得多来几打呀，难得这么亲民～
才俩天，这个新闻/故事在推特上就有92K点击率，amazing. 华人上好少啊，语言的缘故？英文在中文网站不够亲民哈。
Intercept上的故事很有意思，各种各样的离奇的真实爆料故事。
“Why Are You Challenging Him?”
The drama began even before the trial started, when a prosecutor tried to ensure that an Asian American man was not chosen for the jury. The judge questioned the prosecutor’s motive. The potential juror, the judge noted, “is Asian; why are you challenging him? I see no reason to challenge him.”
When the prosecutor replied that the objection was based on the man’s profession, the judge asked what that was. Silence ensued. “You don’t even know what the profession is,” the judge admonished the prosecutor. (Court documents, which give only the man’s first name and last initial, reveal that he worked as a nurse and paraprofessional for a public school system.) The government ended up withdrawing the objection, and the man remained on the jury.
Proving that Yu was singled out will be a challenge. Traditionally, the burden of proof for a selective enforcement motion rests on the defense, and no lawyer has successfully argued it in a China Initiative or related case. But in November, Judge William G. Young reversed an earlier decision on the topic, ordering the U.S. government to turn over to the defense additional evidence connected to Yu’s prosecution.
In one filing, Yu’s lawyers cited comments Lelling made to Science in 2020, in which they say he acknowledged that prosecutors were seeking out ethnic Chinese defendants. “Unfortunately, a lot of our targets are going to be Han Chinese,” Lelling said at the time. “If it were the French government targeting U.S. technology, we’d be looking for Frenchmen.’”
文章很长，有耐心的慢慢看，引一些推特上主编写的～
“NEW: A competitor put the FBI on Haoyang Yu''''''''s trail. Agents sensed a semiconductor theft case involving China, where Yu was born. But the investigation didn''''''''t go quite as planned.”
”In June, a jury acquitted Haoyang Yu of 18 of 19 charges. His lawyers are asking the judge to throw out the last charge, arguing that Yu, a US citizen, was targeted because of his ethnicity.”
“The investigation started when a competitor went to the FBI, saying that Yu''''''''s semiconductor chip company "smells a bit fishy." The tipster hinted, without evidence, that his company might be violating export control regulations.”
“Two factors may have piqued USG interest in the case:
1) It involved semiconductor chips, which are absolutely critical to geopolitical maneuvering and to US-China tensions
2) It came as DOJ was charting plans for the now defunct China Initiative”
“Internal documents in the court record show that early on, agents labeled Haoyang Yu a national security threat believed to be acting on behalf of the Chinese government.
Spoiler alert: this allegation did not stand up. No charges related to China made it into the indictment.”
“(I say "indictment" but there was in fact a series of indictments. Prosecutors often update charges after finding new evidence, but in this case they appear to have changed the allegations after the defense presented evidence refuting earlier charges.)”
”Four federal agencies worked on the investigation of Haoyang Yu. Agents mounted a camera outside his home, rifled through his trash, and followed his wife as she brought their kids to and from sports practice.”
“The court documents show a series of missteps, including a confounding export control classification and a failed sting operation.”
“Following Yu''''''''s arrest, the US government charged his wife, Yanzhi Chen, with wire fraud after she refused to cooperate.
The charges were dropped this summer, after Yu was largely acquitted.”
““There were so many mistakes,” Chen told me. “We have had three very dark years.”
The USAO in Boston, Yu, and his lawyers declined to speak with me, citing ongoing legal proceedings.”
Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing. An investigative journalist may spend months or years researching and preparing a report. Practitioners sometimes use the terms "watchdog reporting" or "accountability reporting."
搬运工完成啦～结尾的 winds through, 我觉得特别特别特别的好笑啊！美国的法律怎么跟儿戏一样～个人可以这么的被司法肆意任意恶意欺负，真是让人目瞪口呆哈！平安夜快乐，圣诞节快乐，enjoy your 小黄人‘a life in the USA!
Chen’s hopes now center on the judge dismissing the case. But she is clear-eyed about Yu’s chances. “The success rate is very low,” she said, adding, “I don’t know why the government has invested so much on us. We are just normal people.”
Meanwhile, in August, Analog Devices finally filed a civil lawsuit against Yu. By the time it winds through the courts, he may be in federal prison.
放在National security 分类底下，觉得好黑色幽默啊！
主编是个小有名气的美女主编，真是人美心善，在上海待过多年，为多个被迫害的华人发声。
俺retweet了一下。顺便打赏了报社。这样的主编和报社得多来几打呀，难得这么亲民～
才俩天，这个新闻/故事在推特上就有92K点击率，amazing. 华人上好少啊，语言的缘故？英文在中文网站不够亲民哈。
Intercept上的故事很有意思，各种各样的离奇的真实爆料故事。
“Why Are You Challenging Him?”
The drama began even before the trial started, when a prosecutor tried to ensure that an Asian American man was not chosen for the jury. The judge questioned the prosecutor’s motive. The potential juror, the judge noted, “is Asian; why are you challenging him? I see no reason to challenge him.”
When the prosecutor replied that the objection was based on the man’s profession, the judge asked what that was. Silence ensued. “You don’t even know what the profession is,” the judge admonished the prosecutor. (Court documents, which give only the man’s first name and last initial, reveal that he worked as a nurse and paraprofessional for a public school system.) The government ended up withdrawing the objection, and the man remained on the jury.
Proving that Yu was singled out will be a challenge. Traditionally, the burden of proof for a selective enforcement motion rests on the defense, and no lawyer has successfully argued it in a China Initiative or related case. But in November, Judge William G. Young reversed an earlier decision on the topic, ordering the U.S. government to turn over to the defense additional evidence connected to Yu’s prosecution.
In one filing, Yu’s lawyers cited comments Lelling made to Science in 2020, in which they say he acknowledged that prosecutors were seeking out ethnic Chinese defendants. “Unfortunately, a lot of our targets are going to be Han Chinese,” Lelling said at the time. “If it were the French government targeting U.S. technology, we’d be looking for Frenchmen.’”
文章很长，有耐心的慢慢看，引一些推特上主编写的～
“NEW: A competitor put the FBI on Haoyang Yu''''''''s trail. Agents sensed a semiconductor theft case involving China, where Yu was born. But the investigation didn''''''''t go quite as planned.”
”In June, a jury acquitted Haoyang Yu of 18 of 19 charges. His lawyers are asking the judge to throw out the last charge, arguing that Yu, a US citizen, was targeted because of his ethnicity.”
“The investigation started when a competitor went to the FBI, saying that Yu''''''''s semiconductor chip company "smells a bit fishy." The tipster hinted, without evidence, that his company might be violating export control regulations.”
“Two factors may have piqued USG interest in the case:
1) It involved semiconductor chips, which are absolutely critical to geopolitical maneuvering and to US-China tensions
2) It came as DOJ was charting plans for the now defunct China Initiative”
“Internal documents in the court record show that early on, agents labeled Haoyang Yu a national security threat believed to be acting on behalf of the Chinese government.
Spoiler alert: this allegation did not stand up. No charges related to China made it into the indictment.”
“(I say "indictment" but there was in fact a series of indictments. Prosecutors often update charges after finding new evidence, but in this case they appear to have changed the allegations after the defense presented evidence refuting earlier charges.)”
”Four federal agencies worked on the investigation of Haoyang Yu. Agents mounted a camera outside his home, rifled through his trash, and followed his wife as she brought their kids to and from sports practice.”
“The court documents show a series of missteps, including a confounding export control classification and a failed sting operation.”
“Following Yu''''''''s arrest, the US government charged his wife, Yanzhi Chen, with wire fraud after she refused to cooperate.
The charges were dropped this summer, after Yu was largely acquitted.”
““There were so many mistakes,” Chen told me. “We have had three very dark years.”
The USAO in Boston, Yu, and his lawyers declined to speak with me, citing ongoing legal proceedings.”