然后各州通过极端法案 如不许墮胎 不许华人买房
zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
版面规则
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
#43 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
你应该知道税法是要国会投票通过的吧?
给你减税少了就是国会阻挠的结果(民主党和共和党的建制派),所以税法是一个妥协的结果。川普本来也要废了奥巴马医保,但是即使妥协也没做到。
给你减税少了就是国会阻挠的结果(民主党和共和党的建制派),所以税法是一个妥协的结果。川普本来也要废了奥巴马医保,但是即使妥协也没做到。
Linjiaojiao 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:16 版上有几个真减税出来喊一声 告诉大家怎幺做到的 当然家庭收十万以下就算
税法是磨古头的政绩 怎又变成左棍阻挠
能不能不要一张嘴就说谎
上次由 Mountainlion 在 2024年 8月 9日 23:27 修改。
共产党就是赤裸裸黑手党
#44 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
不许堕胎为啥是极端法案?不许带套还不许堕胎才叫极端法案啊
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#46 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
大兄弟别浪费时间了,我可以负责任告诉你,这位肯定从来没有自己报过税,2017 tax cut, 40-50万双职工家庭省3-5万一年,AMT废掉了,marriage penalty废了。我随便给你么一个实际的例子,married couple 20w each before tcja 2017, marriage penalty 一项省了16K.
左派同学不服气的也可以数据说话
To calculate the tax savings for a married couple with each spouse earning $200,000 annually under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), we'll follow these steps:
Determine the combined income: Since both spouses earn $200,000, the total household income is $400,000.
Identify the tax brackets pre-TCJA:
2017 tax brackets (pre-TCJA) for married filing jointly:
10% on income up to $18,650
15% on income from $18,651 to $75,900
25% on income from $75,901 to $153,100
28% on income from $153,101 to $233,350
33% on income from $233,351 to $416,700
35% on income from $416,701 to $470,700
39.6% on income over $470,700
Identify the tax brackets post-TCJA:
2018 and beyond (post-TCJA) for married filing jointly:
10% on income up to $19,050
12% on income from $19,051 to $77,400
22% on income from $77,401 to $165,000
24% on income from $165,001 to $315,000
32% on income from $315,001 to $400,000
35% on income from $400,001 to $600,000
37% on income over $600,000
Calculate the tax under both scenarios:
Pre-TCJA tax liability
Post-TCJA tax liability
Subtract to find the savings.
Let's calculate these amounts.
For a married couple with a combined annual income of $400,000:
Tax liability pre-TCJA (2017): $107,217
Tax liability post-TCJA (2018 and beyond): $91,379
Tax savings due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: $15,838
左派同学不服气的也可以数据说话
To calculate the tax savings for a married couple with each spouse earning $200,000 annually under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), we'll follow these steps:
Determine the combined income: Since both spouses earn $200,000, the total household income is $400,000.
Identify the tax brackets pre-TCJA:
2017 tax brackets (pre-TCJA) for married filing jointly:
10% on income up to $18,650
15% on income from $18,651 to $75,900
25% on income from $75,901 to $153,100
28% on income from $153,101 to $233,350
33% on income from $233,351 to $416,700
35% on income from $416,701 to $470,700
39.6% on income over $470,700
Identify the tax brackets post-TCJA:
2018 and beyond (post-TCJA) for married filing jointly:
10% on income up to $19,050
12% on income from $19,051 to $77,400
22% on income from $77,401 to $165,000
24% on income from $165,001 to $315,000
32% on income from $315,001 to $400,000
35% on income from $400,001 to $600,000
37% on income over $600,000
Calculate the tax under both scenarios:
Pre-TCJA tax liability
Post-TCJA tax liability
Subtract to find the savings.
Let's calculate these amounts.
For a married couple with a combined annual income of $400,000:
Tax liability pre-TCJA (2017): $107,217
Tax liability post-TCJA (2018 and beyond): $91,379
Tax savings due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: $15,838
Mountainlion 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:27 你应该知道税法是要国会投票通过的吧?
给你减税少了就是国会阻挠的结果(民主党和共和党的建制派),所以税法是一个妥协的结果。川普本来也要废了奥巴马医保,但是因为妥协也没不到。
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#47 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
恩,这个walz是可能要打热战的,这票是绝对投不下去了
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#48 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
你懂 抢先交 按老税法可以itemize 可免税
下一年交 了白 salt被取消
一堆人叫就是要打击蓝州高房价区中产 其实这本来是红区 只是在蓝州没用 多搓点油
#49 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
笑尿了,amt了解一下把,不要听人胡说八道,我老再这个问题上指导了不下10位中国城‘会计师’,他们看完我给他的example都不说话了。lol
Linjiaojiao 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:35 你懂 抢先交 按老税法可以itemize 可免税
下一年交 了白 salt被取消
一堆人叫就是要打击蓝州高房价区中产 其实这本来是红区 只是在蓝州没用 多搓点油
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#50 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
会计在这里,你这是胡扯
还marriage penalty 就1.6万
以前我以为你是马工,现在看你这么无知,大概是唐人街洗碗的非法移民
还marriage penalty 就1.6万
以前我以为你是马工,现在看你这么无知,大概是唐人街洗碗的非法移民
赖美豪中 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:32 大兄弟别浪费时间了,我可以负责任告诉你,这位肯定从来没有自己报过税,2017 tax cut, 40-50万双职工家庭省3-5万一年,AMT废掉了,marriage penalty废了。我随便给你么一个实际的例子,married couple 20w each before tcja 2017, marriage penalty 一项省了16K.
左派同学不服气的也可以数据说话
To calculate the tax savings for a married couple with each spouse earning $200,000 annually under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), we'll follow these steps:
Determine the combined income: Since both spouses earn $200,000, the total household income is $400,000.
Identify the tax brackets pre-TCJA:
2017 tax brackets (pre-TCJA) for married filing jointly:
10% on income up to $18,650
15% on income from $18,651 to $75,900
25% on income from $75,901 to $153,100
28% on income from $153,101 to $233,350
33% on income from $233,351 to $416,700
35% on income from $416,701 to $470,700
39.6% on income over $470,700
Identify the tax brackets post-TCJA:
2018 and beyond (post-TCJA) for married filing jointly:
10% on income up to $19,050
12% on income from $19,051 to $77,400
22% on income from $77,401 to $165,000
24% on income from $165,001 to $315,000
32% on income from $315,001 to $400,000
35% on income from $400,001 to $600,000
37% on income over $600,000
Calculate the tax under both scenarios:
Pre-TCJA tax liability
Post-TCJA tax liability
Subtract to find the savings.
Let's calculate these amounts.
For a married couple with a combined annual income of $400,000:
Tax liability pre-TCJA (2017): $107,217
Tax liability post-TCJA (2018 and beyond): $91,379
Tax savings due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: $15,838
x1

#51 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
普通老美中产有个屁四五十万 坐实给富人谋福利 你咋不光入百万减得更多赖美豪中 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:32 大兄弟别浪费时间了,我可以负责任告诉你,这位肯定从来没有自己报过税,2017 tax cut, 40-50万双职工家庭省3-5万一年,AMT废掉了,marriage penalty废了。我随便给你么一个实际的例子,married couple 20w each before tcja 2017, marriage penalty 一项省了16K.
左派同学不服气的也可以数据说话
To calculate the tax savings for a married couple with each spouse earning $200,000 annually under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), we'll follow these steps:
Determine the combined income: Since both spouses earn $200,000, the total household income is $400,000.
Identify the tax brackets pre-TCJA:
2017 tax brackets (pre-TCJA) for married filing jointly:
10% on income up to $18,650
15% on income from $18,651 to $75,900
25% on income from $75,901 to $153,100
28% on income from $153,101 to $233,350
33% on income from $233,351 to $416,700
35% on income from $416,701 to $470,700
39.6% on income over $470,700
Identify the tax brackets post-TCJA:
2018 and beyond (post-TCJA) for married filing jointly:
10% on income up to $19,050
12% on income from $19,051 to $77,400
22% on income from $77,401 to $165,000
24% on income from $165,001 to $315,000
32% on income from $315,001 to $400,000
35% on income from $400,001 to $600,000
37% on income over $600,000
Calculate the tax under both scenarios:
Pre-TCJA tax liability
Post-TCJA tax liability
Subtract to find the savings.
Let's calculate these amounts.
For a married couple with a combined annual income of $400,000:
Tax liability pre-TCJA (2017): $107,217
Tax liability post-TCJA (2018 and beyond): $91,379
Tax savings due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: $15,838
那老哥有四五十万收也不会活不下去
篮州15到三十万之间一普遍加税
#52 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
你这种两年税放一起交itemize一年,standard其实根本省不了多少钱。而且也就是低收入可以用用。高收入AMT很快就hit了,pre-tcja,我的经验是差不多18万以上你的propety tax 过10k就会hit
Linjiaojiao 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:35 你懂 抢先交 按老税法可以itemize 可免税
下一年交 了白 salt被取消
一堆人叫就是要打击蓝州高房价区中产 其实这本来是红区 只是在蓝州没用 多搓点油
上次由 赖美豪中 在 2024年 8月 9日 23:44 修改。
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#53 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
你显然没有仔细算过把,我老上次就贴过,180k agi如果你的propety tax过1万也是很容易hit AMT的,25万左右几乎100% hit,你知道hit AMT是啥意思把
Linjiaojiao 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:42 普通老美中产有个屁四五十万 坐实给富人谋福利 你咋不光入百万减得更多
那老哥有四五十万收也不会活不下去
篮州15到三十万之间一普遍加税
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#54 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
税是肯定减了,但是不可能每个人都受益。你说的这个是有不少人减少了抵扣,不过这个我个人认为从道理上是合理的,地税是用在地方,很多地方就有动力推高房价,变相从联邦拿到更多补贴,对低房价或者低税区确实不公平,我当时也在兰州,地税也抵扣少了,房子不太贵所以还可以,但是我觉得这个不是最重要的事情,每个人情况都不一样。我估计狸猫恨他这个也是一个原因。Linjiaojiao 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:35 你懂 抢先交 按老税法可以itemize 可免税
下一年交 了白 salt被取消
一堆人叫就是要打击蓝州高房价区中产 其实这本来是红区 只是在蓝州没用 多搓点油
#55 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
那我给你一个低一点的?你要itemize多少钱才能省出4000?
For a married couple with a combined annual income of $150,000:
Tax liability pre-TCJA (2017): $28,977.50
Tax liability post-TCJA (2018 and beyond): $24,879.00
Tax savings due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: $4,098.50
This is the amount the couple would save in taxes under the new tax law compared to the old one with the updated income
For a married couple with a combined annual income of $150,000:
Tax liability pre-TCJA (2017): $28,977.50
Tax liability post-TCJA (2018 and beyond): $24,879.00
Tax savings due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: $4,098.50
This is the amount the couple would save in taxes under the new tax law compared to the old one with the updated income
Linjiaojiao 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:42 普通老美中产有个屁四五十万 坐实给富人谋福利 你咋不光入百万减得更多
那老哥有四五十万收也不会活不下去
篮州15到三十万之间一普遍加税
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#56 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
你这个例子有个巨大的问题,没有算standard deduction or itemized deduction 的区别赖美豪中 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:43 你这种两年税放一起交itemize一年,standard其实根本省不了多少钱。而且也就是低收入可以用用。高收入AMT很快就hit了,pre-tcja,我的经验是差不多15万以上你的propety tax 过10k就会hit
川傻那里,所有房地产稅, 州税,房地产贷款利息,三样加起来不能超过1万
以前旧税法下,普通中产这三样加起来轻松到5万
然后以前的夫妻40万要扣掉这个5万,还有一家四口的个人免税额之后,大概变成33万AGI
聚聚税法下就是38万应纳税额
所以你最后的税率bracket 应用都不对
所以几乎所有中产都哭诉聚聚税法下贵了1-2万的income tax
赖尿是唐人街洗碗的没跑了
#57 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
你别听她扯,他显然不懂税法,这个我myth来源于一些三脚猫会计师,其实基本上我上次给一个算例。20左右,如果你deduct 15k tax+15k利息,几乎100% hit AMT的。所以根本没法itemize. 2017 TCJA最牛b是2个:实际上废掉AMT,和废除了marriage penalty.
2017 TCJA最吃亏的一群人其实是收入再60万以上w-2. 然后有10万左右的州税和地产税(加州)
2017 TCJA最吃亏的一群人其实是收入再60万以上w-2. 然后有10万左右的州税和地产税(加州)
branching 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:44 税是肯定减了,但是不可能每个人都受益。你说的这个是有不少人减少了抵扣,不过这个我个人认为从道理上是合理的,地税是用在地方,很多地方就有动力推高房价,变相从联邦拿到更多补贴,对低房价或者低税区确实不公平,我当时也在兰州,地税也抵扣少了,房子不太贵所以还可以,但是我觉得这个不是最重要的事情,每个人情况都不一样。我估计狸猫恨他这个也是一个原因。
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#58 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
一对加州夫妻收入40万,光州税就4万多
地产税来个1万,房贷利息来个2万,再一家四口免税额2万,就是30万AGI
地产税来个1万,房贷利息来个2万,再一家四口免税额2万,就是30万AGI
lilyamao 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:48 你这个例子有个巨大的问题,没有算standard deduction or itemized deduction 的区别
川傻那里,所有房地产稅, 州税,房地产贷款利息,三样加起来不能超过1万
以前旧税法下,普通中产这三样加起来轻松到5万
然后以前的夫妻40万要扣掉这个5万,还有一家四口的个人免税额之后,大概变成33万AGI
聚聚税法下就是38万应纳税额
所以你最后的税率bracket 应用都不对
所以几乎所有中产都哭诉聚聚税法下贵了1-2万的income tax
赖尿是唐人街洗碗的没跑了
#59 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
胡闹呢,AMT算了么。我老给你算一下啊
To calculate the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) for a married couple filing jointly for the tax year 2017 with each spouse earning $200,000, and having $50,000 in local tax and mortgage interest, we need to follow these steps:
Calculate regular taxable income:
Start with the combined income of $400,000.
Subtract the standard or itemized deductions (we'll use the $50,000 in local tax and mortgage interest as itemized deductions in this case).
Calculate AMT taxable income:
Add back certain deductions that are not allowed for AMT purposes (local taxes, etc.).
Apply AMT exemption:
Determine the AMT exemption for 2017 for married couples filing jointly.
The exemption is reduced by 25% of the amount by which AMT income exceeds a certain threshold.
Calculate AMT:
AMT is calculated using the AMT tax rates:
26% on the first $187,800 of AMT income.
28% on any income over $187,800.
Compare the AMT with regular tax:
The taxpayer pays the higher of the AMT or the regular tax.
Let's calculate this step by step.
For the tax year 2017, with a married couple each earning $200,000 (total $400,000) and having $50,000 in local taxes and mortgage interest:
AMT tax liability: $101,377
Regular tax liability (pre-TCJA): $107,217
Since the regular tax liability is higher than the AMT tax, they would not be subject to AMT, and their tax liability would remain at $107,217.
To calculate the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) for a married couple filing jointly for the tax year 2017 with each spouse earning $200,000, and having $50,000 in local tax and mortgage interest, we need to follow these steps:
Calculate regular taxable income:
Start with the combined income of $400,000.
Subtract the standard or itemized deductions (we'll use the $50,000 in local tax and mortgage interest as itemized deductions in this case).
Calculate AMT taxable income:
Add back certain deductions that are not allowed for AMT purposes (local taxes, etc.).
Apply AMT exemption:
Determine the AMT exemption for 2017 for married couples filing jointly.
The exemption is reduced by 25% of the amount by which AMT income exceeds a certain threshold.
Calculate AMT:
AMT is calculated using the AMT tax rates:
26% on the first $187,800 of AMT income.
28% on any income over $187,800.
Compare the AMT with regular tax:
The taxpayer pays the higher of the AMT or the regular tax.
Let's calculate this step by step.
For the tax year 2017, with a married couple each earning $200,000 (total $400,000) and having $50,000 in local taxes and mortgage interest:
AMT tax liability: $101,377
Regular tax liability (pre-TCJA): $107,217
Since the regular tax liability is higher than the AMT tax, they would not be subject to AMT, and their tax liability would remain at $107,217.
lilyamao 写了: 2024年 8月 9日 23:48 你这个例子有个巨大的问题,没有算standard deduction or itemized deduction 的区别
川傻那里,所有房地产稅, 州税,房地产贷款利息,三样加起来不能超过1万
以前旧税法下,普通中产这三样加起来轻松到5万
然后以前的夫妻40万要扣掉这个5万,还有一家四口的个人免税额之后,大概变成33万AGI
聚聚税法下就是38万应纳税额
所以你最后的税率bracket 应用都不对
所以几乎所有中产都哭诉聚聚税法下贵了1-2万的income tax
赖尿是唐人街洗碗的没跑了
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#60 Re: zt 明州的人谈谈 Tim Walz
AMT算了么?甘蔗没有两头甜啊,你40万收入还想itemize 6万?你在做梦把
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.