ChatGPT4o成精了吗?看看它吐槽C++和CMake

电脑,手机,硬件,软件,电子产品等

版主: Jack12345

回复
libaliu(里八六)楼主
著名写手
著名写手
帖子互动: 12
帖子: 221
注册时间: 2022年 12月 29日 16:48

#1 ChatGPT4o成精了吗?看看它吐槽C++和CMake

帖子 libaliu(里八六)楼主 »

开始我只是让它帮解释一下一个人对C++和CMake的吐槽。没有想到ChatGPT4o居然会自己发挥。很有意思。我的对话开始(之前没有然何别的提示):

please explain the next blog into Chinese: "I was a C++ developer in a past life and Cmake was a big reason I moved on to greener pastures. It’s the only language that is more toilsome to use than C++ itself, and that by an enormous margin. It’s stringly typed (no, that’s not a typo, everything is a string), it’s syntax is obscure, it extends so poorly that it just bakes-in support for building popular libraries (e.g., Google’s test framework, Qt, etc iirc), imports are implicit so it’s tedious to track down the definition for a particular symbol, it completely punts on package management—not only were builds not reproducible but you couldn’t even get it to download and install dependencies for you from a declarative list."

然后它给我回复如下。加了红线的是我发现它自己发挥的地方:

图片


咦?这家伙居然自己发挥了。我就开始追问它 "随时可能踩坑",“..宠幸...” 是原文哪里提到的:

图片


图片


它还自告奋勇再加点“调料” 。好吧。我当然同意。看看它的吐槽水平。我妹有想到的是,它居然学会了“摇摇领先”(如图红线是我加的)
图片


你也“摇摇领先”?我有点惊讶了。不会是华为教的吧?它居然开起来玩笑,说是"野生进化"的。

图片
lyy
见习作家
见习作家
帖子互动: 36
帖子: 409
注册时间: 2022年 7月 26日 14:17

#2 Re: ChatGPT4o成精了吗?看看它吐槽C++和CMake

帖子 lyy »

感觉是学了国内的什么吐槽文的内容,然后找你显摆来了
赖美豪中(my pronouns: ha/ha)
论坛元老
论坛元老
2023年度优秀版主
帖子互动: 3431
帖子: 41040
注册时间: 2022年 9月 6日 12:50

#3 Re: ChatGPT4o成精了吗?看看它吐槽C++和CMake

帖子 赖美豪中(my pronouns: ha/ha) »

我觉得cmake挺好的,其实没有什么坑,比c++强多了,因为逻辑还是自洽得,c++简直是tmd灾难,尤其是运算符重载,还真有很多sb在用
libaliu 写了: 2025年 3月 7日 16:32 开始我只是让它帮解释一下一个人对C++和CMake的吐槽。没有想到ChatGPT4o居然会自己发挥。很有意思。我的对话开始(之前没有然何别的提示):

please explain the next blog into Chinese: "I was a C++ developer in a past life and Cmake was a big reason I moved on to greener pastures. It’s the only language that is more toilsome to use than C++ itself, and that by an enormous margin. It’s stringly typed (no, that’s not a typo, everything is a string), it’s syntax is obscure, it extends so poorly that it just bakes-in support for building popular libraries (e.g., Google’s test framework, Qt, etc iirc), imports are implicit so it’s tedious to track down the definition for a particular symbol, it completely punts on package management—not only were builds not reproducible but you couldn’t even get it to download and install dependencies for you from a declarative list."

然后它给我回复如下。加了红线的是我发现它自己发挥的地方:

图片


咦?这家伙居然自己发挥了。我就开始追问它 "随时可能踩坑",“..宠幸...” 是原文哪里提到的:

图片


图片


它还自告奋勇再加点“调料” 。好吧。我当然同意。看看它的吐槽水平。我妹有想到的是,它居然学会了“摇摇领先”(如图红线是我加的)
图片


你也“摇摇领先”?我有点惊讶了。不会是华为教的吧?它居然开起来玩笑,说是"野生进化"的。

图片
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
回复

回到 “电脑手机(IT)”