反正凡是川宝做的就是对的，是吧？
ABC对Trump说：遣返需要听证，这是法律
版主： alexwlt1024
版面规则
左也行，右也行，文明发帖就欢迎；粉也罢，黑也罢，互相尊重别谩骂。
左也行，右也行，文明发帖就欢迎；粉也罢，黑也罢，互相尊重别谩骂。
#24 Re: ABC对Trump说：遣返需要听证，这是法律
美帝的移民法已经明确规定 可以抓人. 可以直接遣返。法盲左臂太无知。
The relevant section is 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2), which states that an immigration officer may, without a warrant:
“arrest any alien who in his presence or view is entering or attempting to enter the United States in violation of any law or regulation made in pursuance of law regulating the admission, exclusion, expulsion, or removal of aliens, or to arrest any alien in the United States, if he has reason to believe that the alien so arrested is in the United States in violation of any such law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest.”
This statute explicitly allows warrantless arrests under two conditions:
The officer has reason to believe the individual is in the U.S. in violation of immigration laws.
There is a likelihood that the individual will escape before a warrant can be obtained.
8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1): Expedited Removal (Deportation Without a Court Hearing)
This law authorizes expedited removal, a process where certain undocumented immigrants can be deported without a hearing before an immigration judge. This directly addresses the query about whether ICE can deport individuals without a court hearing.
Full Text of Relevant Provisions:
8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) - Inspection of Aliens Arriving in the United States; Expedited Removal:
(A) Screening(i) In general
If an immigration officer determines that an alien (other than an alien described in subparagraph (F)) who is arriving in the United States or is described in clause (iii) is inadmissible under section 1182(a)(6)(C) [fraud or willful misrepresentation] or 1182(a)(7) [lack of valid documentation] of this title, the officer shall order the alien removed from the United States without further hearing or review unless the alien indicates either an intention to apply for asylum under section 1158 of this title or a fear of persecution.(ii) Claims for asylum
If an immigration officer determines that an alien (other than an alien described in subparagraph (F)) who is arriving in the United States or is described in clause (iii) is inadmissible under section 1182(a)(6)(C) or 1182(a)(7) of this title and the alien indicates either an intention to apply for asylum under section 1158 of this title or a fear of persecution, the officer shall refer the alien for an interview by an asylum officer under subparagraph (B).(iii) Application to certain other aliens
(I) In general
The Attorney General may apply clauses (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph to any or all aliens described in subclause (II) as designated by the Attorney General. Such designation shall be in the sole and unreviewable discretion of the Attorney General and may be modified at any time.(II) Aliens described
An alien described in this clause is an alien who has not been admitted or paroled into the United States, and who has not affirmatively shown, to the satisfaction of an immigration officer, that the alien has been physically present in the United States continuously for the 2-year period immediately prior to the date of the determination of inadmissibility under this subparagraph.(B) Asylum Interviews(i) Conduct by asylum officers
An asylum officer shall conduct an interview to determine whether an alien has a credible fear of persecution or torture as defined in section 1158 of this title.(ii) Referral of certain aliens
If the officer determines at the time of the interview that an alien has a credible fear of persecution or torture, the alien shall be detained for further consideration of the application for asylum.(iii) Removal without further review if no credible fear of persecution
If the asylum officer determines that the alien does not have a credible fear of persecution or torture, the alien shall be removed from the United States without further hearing or review, except as provided in clause (iv).(iv) Review by immigration judge
If the alien requests a review of the asylum officer’s determination, an immigration judge shall review the determination. If the judge affirms the asylum officer’s determination, the alien shall be removed without further review.(C) Removal of Aliens Without Credible Fear
An alien who does not have a credible fear of persecution or torture, as determined under subparagraph (B), shall be removed from the United States without further hearing or review, except as provided in subparagraph (B)(iv).
The relevant section is 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2), which states that an immigration officer may, without a warrant:
“arrest any alien who in his presence or view is entering or attempting to enter the United States in violation of any law or regulation made in pursuance of law regulating the admission, exclusion, expulsion, or removal of aliens, or to arrest any alien in the United States, if he has reason to believe that the alien so arrested is in the United States in violation of any such law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest.”
This statute explicitly allows warrantless arrests under two conditions:
The officer has reason to believe the individual is in the U.S. in violation of immigration laws.
There is a likelihood that the individual will escape before a warrant can be obtained.
8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1): Expedited Removal (Deportation Without a Court Hearing)
This law authorizes expedited removal, a process where certain undocumented immigrants can be deported without a hearing before an immigration judge. This directly addresses the query about whether ICE can deport individuals without a court hearing.
Full Text of Relevant Provisions:
8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) - Inspection of Aliens Arriving in the United States; Expedited Removal:
(A) Screening(i) In general
If an immigration officer determines that an alien (other than an alien described in subparagraph (F)) who is arriving in the United States or is described in clause (iii) is inadmissible under section 1182(a)(6)(C) [fraud or willful misrepresentation] or 1182(a)(7) [lack of valid documentation] of this title, the officer shall order the alien removed from the United States without further hearing or review unless the alien indicates either an intention to apply for asylum under section 1158 of this title or a fear of persecution.(ii) Claims for asylum
If an immigration officer determines that an alien (other than an alien described in subparagraph (F)) who is arriving in the United States or is described in clause (iii) is inadmissible under section 1182(a)(6)(C) or 1182(a)(7) of this title and the alien indicates either an intention to apply for asylum under section 1158 of this title or a fear of persecution, the officer shall refer the alien for an interview by an asylum officer under subparagraph (B).(iii) Application to certain other aliens
(I) In general
The Attorney General may apply clauses (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph to any or all aliens described in subclause (II) as designated by the Attorney General. Such designation shall be in the sole and unreviewable discretion of the Attorney General and may be modified at any time.(II) Aliens described
An alien described in this clause is an alien who has not been admitted or paroled into the United States, and who has not affirmatively shown, to the satisfaction of an immigration officer, that the alien has been physically present in the United States continuously for the 2-year period immediately prior to the date of the determination of inadmissibility under this subparagraph.(B) Asylum Interviews(i) Conduct by asylum officers
An asylum officer shall conduct an interview to determine whether an alien has a credible fear of persecution or torture as defined in section 1158 of this title.(ii) Referral of certain aliens
If the officer determines at the time of the interview that an alien has a credible fear of persecution or torture, the alien shall be detained for further consideration of the application for asylum.(iii) Removal without further review if no credible fear of persecution
If the asylum officer determines that the alien does not have a credible fear of persecution or torture, the alien shall be removed from the United States without further hearing or review, except as provided in clause (iv).(iv) Review by immigration judge
If the alien requests a review of the asylum officer’s determination, an immigration judge shall review the determination. If the judge affirms the asylum officer’s determination, the alien shall be removed without further review.(C) Removal of Aliens Without Credible Fear
An alien who does not have a credible fear of persecution or torture, as determined under subparagraph (B), shall be removed from the United States without further hearing or review, except as provided in subparagraph (B)(iv).
x1
-
Zephyrca
- 论坛支柱
2024年度优秀版主
Zephyrca 的博客 - 帖子互动： 1258
- 帖子： 11379
- 注册时间： 2022年 8月 12日 22:10
#27 Re: ABC对Trump说：遣返需要听证，这是法律
如果全部都是非移，哪里来的争议？就算有争议的肯定是极少部分，为了那极少部分就要delay全部2千万的遣返？洗地太不专业了，逻辑是体育老师教的
x1
保守派们欢迎来美国时政版：
-
Zephyrca
- 论坛支柱
2024年度优秀版主
Zephyrca 的博客 - 帖子互动： 1258
- 帖子： 11379
- 注册时间： 2022年 8月 12日 22:10
#30 Re: ABC对Trump说：遣返需要听证，这是法律
你google的你自己都不读吗？
快速递解适用于2年以下的，但是那个新闻热点里叫加西亚的那个人，已经10年了。
快速递解适用于2年以下的，但是那个新闻热点里叫加西亚的那个人，已经10年了。
dealfinder10 写了： 2025年 5月 1日 10:21 that the alien has been physically present in the United States continuously for the 2-year period immediately prior to the date of the determination of inadmissibility under this subparagraph.(B) Asylum Interviews(i) Conduct by asylum officers
上次由 fieldman 在 2025年 5月 1日 14:12 修改。
#31 Re: ABC对Trump说：遣返需要听证，这是法律
为啥其他总统做的比蘑菇头又快又好？
因为蘑菇头专门pick fight, intent to provoke argument. 比如驱逐非遗没问题的，但人家却积极的审查合法签证。政府当然有权审查，但你干完非遗再来惹事行不？
因为蘑菇头专门pick fight, intent to provoke argument. 比如驱逐非遗没问题的，但人家却积极的审查合法签证。政府当然有权审查，但你干完非遗再来惹事行不？
#32 Re: ABC对Trump说：遣返需要听证，这是法律
在任何一家公司，你要是放着本职工作不努力，积极的搞其他人，早就被开一万遍了。这是常识。也就是蘑菇头一直当老板，当其他人都是傻子，其实是其他人不好跟老板计较。
不过pick fight是能骗傻子的，蘑菇头教众千篇一律的指责对手民主党
不过pick fight是能骗傻子的，蘑菇头教众千篇一律的指责对手民主党
x1
-
Zephyrca
- 论坛支柱
2024年度优秀版主
Zephyrca 的博客 - 帖子互动： 1258
- 帖子： 11379
- 注册时间： 2022年 8月 12日 22:10
#35 Re: ABC对Trump说：遣返需要听证，这是法律
没错，奥8破坏美国真的做得又快又好，8年+拜登四年把美国文革了好几遍7H12$F+vu 写了： 2025年 5月 1日 12:53 为啥其他总统做的比蘑菇头又快又好？
因为蘑菇头专门pick fight, intent to provoke argument. 比如驱逐非遗没问题的，但人家却积极的审查合法签证。政府当然有权审查，但你干完非遗再来惹事行不？
#37 Re: ABC对Trump说：遣返需要听证，这是法律
作弊媒体ABC让TRUMP 驱除非移时走所谓的漫长的“法律程序“， 达到一万年也无法驱除这些 illegal aliens。 这些人不是移民，是INVADER，就是入侵者。Yesterday 写了： 2025年 4月 30日 00:20 Trump回答：
1. Biden打开边境，2000万非法移民进美国有听证吗？
2. 遣返每一个非法移民需要听证的话，一个听证要2个星期或者更长时间，2000万需要多长时间？
2000万 ， 2个星期，需要多少律师？需要多少人力物力财力，想象一下保证你脑袋炸裂。
听证完了呢？就是无休止的扯皮。各位将军交税支持这个无底洞
法律没错啊，ABC记者也没错啊，难道Trump又错了？
LOL
驱除入侵者，保卫国家，是一种战争，是美国总统的职责，不是作弊法官的干涉的范围。在这片土地上, 作弊政府故意放入巨量非法入侵者，妄图毁掉这个国家，达到猪党独裁的目的。
法律何在?!
x1
