支持2a 不代表着宣扬胡编的数据，宣扬种族主义，这是给华人挖坑呢？

[oldestghost]

原贴中，目测80%的占比，与第三方统计的29%占比。。。这个已经不能用算错来形容了，就是造谣。

Most shooters and accused shooters are either White (38 percent) or Black (29 percent), followed by Hispanic/Latino (14 percent), Asian/Pacific Islander (5 percent) and Native American (1 percent). The remaining nine percent are of another race or their race is not available.

反正造谣和丢人的不是我，你们继续。

[YouHi]

原贴中，目测80%的占比，与第三方统计的29%占比。。。这个已经不能用算错来形容了，就是造谣。

Most shooters and accused shooters are either White (38 percent) or Black (29 percent), followed by Hispanic/Latino (14 percent), Asian/Pacific Islander (5 percent) and Native American (1 percent). The remaining nine percent are of another race or their race is not available.

反正造谣和丢人的不是我，你们继续。

我支持你。不过你不要低估jhe123网友的战斗力。。。

[jhe123]

楼上的id看起来在陷害枪版版主，反正丢人的不是我。








虽然两组数据跨越时间段不同。

我还是相信统计网站而不是充斥谣言的x

随便补充点其他信息。

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/i ... /shooters/

Most shooters and accused shooters are either White (38 percent) or Black (29 percent), followed by Hispanic/Latino (14 percent), Asian/Pacific Islander (5 percent) and Native American (1 percent). The remaining nine percent are of another race or their race is not available.

LOL, 实际上丢人的就是你。

你现在引用的这些所谓mass shooting枪手的族裔分布的数据，实际上都是根据FBI active shooting的数据整理出来的。只不过反枪左x们为了搅混水，为了让自己编撰的“mass shooting"数据能吓唬住更多的人，故意在谈到FBI active shooting时用mass shooting 来混淆。

[Nameless]

这个讨论放在外版挺好。我既不能“捂嘴”，也就不负能捂嘴的责任。

刚才在Google里搜了下“gun violence statistics by race”。A1 （数字一）overview给出了结果。其中地一句话是
“For example, Black youth in 2022 had a gun death rate approximately six times higher than their white counterparts”

CDC：
In 2021, among males, Black or African American (Black) males had the highest age-adjusted rate of firearm-related homicide (52.9 deaths per 100,000 standard population), and Asian males had the lowest rate (1.5). Among females, Black females had the highest rate (7.5), and Asian females had the lowest rate (0.5). Males had higher rates than females across all race and Hispanic origin groups
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/ ... n%20groups.

反枪网站：bradyunited

Despite accounting for only 14% of the U.S. population, Black people account for 60% of those killed by firearm homicide each year. On average, Black people are over 11.5 times more likely to be victims of firearm homicide than their non-Hispanic white peers.

https://www.bradyunited.org/resources/r ... ck%20males.

[oldestghost]

我支持你。不过你不要低估jhe123网友的战斗力。。。

我都被枪版封了一天。。。呵呵。

所以。。。我再发一下原帖截图和数据。。。自己比较呗





虽然两组数据跨越时间段不同。

我还是相信统计网站而不是充斥谣言的x

随便补充点其他信息。

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/i ... /shooters/

Most shooters and accused shooters are either White (38 percent) or Black (29 percent), followed by Hispanic/Latino (14 percent), Asian/Pacific Islander (5 percent) and Native American (1 percent). The remaining nine percent are of another race or their race is not available.

[jhe123]

我支持你。不过你不要低估jhe123网友的战斗力。。。

你支持他？LOL，那你要跟着丢人了。

这个贴子里他给出的两个数据，不仅没有一个和原帖楼主的数据相关，甚至他自己的两个数据说的都不是一回事。完全的张冠李戴牛头不对马嘴，逻辑上这么大漏洞还死鸭子嘴硬的人，叔还是第一回遇到。LOL。。。

他的第一个数据，统计的是四十多年，在公共场合的大规模active shooting案例，40多年只有151起。

他的第二个数据，统计的应该是2006年以来所有active shooting的案例，总共486起。

楼主原帖，估计谈论的是2023年所有一次死亡多人的枪击案，一年大约300起。

而反枪媒体经常引用和大肆宣扬的mass shooting，是由GVA统计的，2023一年656起。

但凡有点常识的人，只要一看着数据样本量，就应该知道这几个数据谈论的不是同一件事情。

可是有人就要故意装傻或者死鸭子嘴硬，不停的反复张贴毫无意义的数据对比来撑场面或者搅混水。

你还要支持这种人吗？LOL。。。

[oldestghost]

[oldestghost]

好困