哈德逊湾是国际水域

[LightFast]

看来下次加拿大军机军舰再到南海自由航行，中国也可以到哈德逊湾自由航行。

[ferrygao]

狂赞

[C919]

封口有超过24海里吗？

[LightFast]

封口有超过24海里吗？

55公里，超过了。

[geust]

超过了。

但是《联合国海洋法公约》在这里不适用。想挑战北约第五条的可以在这里试试。LOL

封口有超过24海里吗？

[verdelite]

超过了。

但是《联合国海洋法公约》在这里不适用。想挑战北约第五条的可以在这里试试。LOL

为啥不适用？谁宣布的

[geust]

培训傻x这种事不做。LOL

想挑战北约第五条的可以在这里试试呗。

为啥不适用？谁宣布的

[kazan]

AI Overview
Learn more
Hudson Bay - WorldAtlas
Yes, Hudson Bay belongs to Canada. Specifically, it is an inland sea located in east-central Canada, bounded by Nunavut, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. The Canadian government designates the entire Hudson Bay basin as a "mare clausum" (closed sea) for conservation purposes.

[fhnan]

超过了。

但是《联合国海洋法公约》在这里不适用。想挑战北约第五条的可以在这里试试。LOL

基于规则的国际秩序

[LightFast]

AI Overview
Learn more
Hudson Bay - WorldAtlas
Yes, Hudson Bay belongs to Canada. Specifically, it is an inland sea located in east-central Canada, bounded by Nunavut, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. The Canadian government designates the entire Hudson Bay basin as a "mare clausum" (closed sea) for conservation purposes.

copilot:
However, the United States does not fully recognize this claim and considers parts of Hudson Bay to be international waters. This ongoing dispute is part of broader regional disagreements between the two countries

chatgpt:
The United States and some other countries may not officially recognize Hudson Bay as internal waters, but this has not led to significant international disputes. The bay's remote location and limited navigational routes contribute to its status as a relatively low-profile area in terms of international maritime law

gemini:
However, the United States and most maritime nations do not fully recognize Canada's claim, instead viewing much of Hudson Bay as international waters. They argue that it does not meet the criteria for a "juridical bay" under international law, which typically has a narrower entrance.

[kazan]

copilot:
However, the United States does not fully recognize this claim and considers parts of Hudson Bay to be international waters. This ongoing dispute is part of broader regional disagreements between the two countries

chatgpt:
The United States and some other countries may not officially recognize Hudson Bay as internal waters, but this has not led to significant international disputes. The bay's remote location and limited navigational routes contribute to its status as a relatively low-profile area in terms of international maritime law

gemini:
However, the United States and most maritime nations do not fully recognize Canada's claim, instead viewing much of Hudson Bay as international waters. They argue that it does not meet the criteria for a "juridical bay" under international law, which typically has a narrower entrance.

Grok:
Yes, Hudson Bay belongs to Canada. It is a large body of saltwater in northeastern Canada, bordered by the provinces of Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, and the territory of Nunavut. The bay is under Canadian jurisdiction, and its surrounding lands are part of Canadian territory.

[quovadis]

加拿大自称是内水，难道国际法有不同理解？

[quovadis]

看来下次加拿大军机军舰再到南海自由航行，中国也可以到哈德逊湾自由航行。

那加拿大军舰再到渤海自由航行

[LightFast]

那加拿大军舰再到渤海自由航行

链接都给你了看一遍就不会问这两个蠢问题了。

[marclee]

主要是周边濒临水域没有其他国家，没有临水的任何其他国家。

[kazan]

哈德逊湾有两个出入口，北部通过福克斯海峡与福克斯湾相连，这个出入口的宽度约148公里。东北部通过哈德逊海峡与大西洋相连，海峡的宽度约115公里，1海里约等于1.8公里，因此这两个出入口的宽度都在24海里以上。虽然没有满足条件，但加拿大还是把哈德逊湾认定为了内水，有什么根据呢？

主要有两个根据。第一，联合国海洋法公约的特殊规定。一般来说，要把内海认定为内水，都要满足以上的两个条件。但联合国海洋法公约还有一个特殊的规定，历史性海湾的湾口宽度不论是否超过24海里，湾口之内的水域都被视为沿岸国的内水，适用沿岸国有关内水的法律，不适用一般国际法则。所谓历史性海湾，指的是历史上就归沿岸国所有，现在依然处在沿岸国的控制下，并且没有争议的海湾。而加拿大就把哈德逊湾认定为了历史性海湾。

第二，加拿大的历史根据。现在的哈德逊湾确实处在加拿大的控制下，并且也没有领土和海域的争议。但加拿大怎么证明哈德逊湾历史上属于自己呢？加拿大是一个非常年轻的国家，历史上属于英国殖民地，可以说基本没有历史，不过加拿大还是拿出来历史根据。这个根据就是加拿大和英国于1869年签订的购地条约。

加拿大自治领成立于1867年，最初的控制范围相当于现在加拿大的魁北克和安大略地区，而其他地区当时仍处在英国控制之下。到了1869年，英国为了提升加拿大的实力，便授意哈德逊湾公司，将公司旗下的土地卖给了加拿大自治领。哈德逊湾公司是英国的一家殖民公司，控制的范围主要就是哈德逊湾以及沿岸的土地，土地面积约300万平方公里，差不多相当于现在加拿大面积的三分之一。

http://www.360doc.com/content/22/0202/1 ... 1132.shtml