数名蒙面人持突击步枪在Walmart停车场把人推进汽车里

[Havana]

你现在不坚持“非法移民非法入境美國本身就是聯邦重罪”？

未佩戴警徽的蒙面持枪便服和绑匪有什么区别，能执行哪门子的逮捕？

美國公民如果妨礙聯邦探員執法也是聯邦重罪，應該被當場逮捕，ICE探員已經很克制了，我完全支持ICE執法，我認為ICE還不夠強硬。

[Havana]

老领导是不是忘了无罪推定。

一个着便装，蒙面的持枪人员谁知道他是劫匪，还是active shooter，质疑他怎么就违法犯罪了。

so？美国公民就是你违法犯罪得挡箭牌了？

[赖美豪中]

自信一点，无罪推定不适用于执法过程。

老领导是不是忘了无罪推定。

一个着便装，蒙面的持枪人员谁知道他是劫匪，还是active shooter，质疑他怎么就违法犯罪了。

[foxbat]

一群五毛面对面瘫帝被架走，屁都不敢放；
面对ICE抓非移又开始分泌廉价的同情心了

[Havana]

不戴警徽就执法，老领导是去了阿富汗，还是索马里。

自信一点，无罪推定不适用于执法过程。

[赖美豪中]

自信一点，看看chatgpt?
plainclothes law enforcement officers can legally make arrests, just like uniformed officers. Their authority comes from their status as sworn law enforcement personnel, not from wearing a uniform.

Key Points:
Legal Authority: As long as the plainclothes officer is properly identified as a law enforcement officer (e.g., carrying a badge and ID), they have full authority to conduct arrests.

Identification Required: In most jurisdictions, they are required to identify themselves as police officers and display their badge or ID before making an arrest, unless doing so would jeopardize their safety or the investigation.

Undercover Exception: If the officer is working undercover, they may delay identifying themselves until it is safe or appropriate during the arrest.

Civilian vs. Officer: A plainclothes officer is not the same as a civilian. Civilians can only make limited “citizen’s arrests” under specific circumstances, but plainclothes officers have full police powers.

不戴警徽就执法，老领导是去了阿富汗，还是索马里。

[jhe123]

印象里面美国的右派是主张限制和约束联邦政府权力的，可见MAGA特别是黄疮都是待出轨的左左

"执法人员中大多数穿着制服，汽车里面至少一辆涂有CBP标志。"

LOL，你这五毛，说不出实质内容了，就开始胡言乱语语无伦次扯不相干的。

[jhe123]

不戴警徽就执法，老领导是去了阿富汗，还是索马里。

而walmart这起，周围那么多穿制服的了，不需要便衣再出示警徽。

[Havana]

便衣，蒙面，未佩戴警徽。

老领导百忙之中还是应该看看原视频再来洗地。

“Legal Authority: As long as the plainclothes officer is properly identified as a law enforcement officer (e.g., carrying a badge and ID), they have full authority to conduct arrests.”

自信一点，看看chatgpt?
plainclothes law enforcement officers can legally make arrests, just like uniformed officers. Their authority comes from their status as sworn law enforcement personnel, not from wearing a uniform.

Key Points:
Legal Authority: As long as the plainclothes officer is properly identified as a law enforcement officer (e.g., carrying a badge and ID), they have full authority to conduct arrests.

Identification Required: In most jurisdictions, they are required to identify themselves as police officers and display their badge or ID before making an arrest, unless doing so would jeopardize their safety or the investigation.

Undercover Exception: If the officer is working undercover, they may delay identifying themselves until it is safe or appropriate during the arrest.

Civilian vs. Officer: A plainclothes officer is not the same as a civilian. Civilians can only make limited “citizen’s arrests” under specific circumstances, but plainclothes officers have full police powers.

[Havana]

这是老领导提供的
“Legal Authority: As long as the plainclothes officer is properly identified as a law enforcement officer (e.g., carrying a badge and ID), they have full authority to conduct arrests.”

你这个不需要是巨巨公开发的EO，还是黄疮内部文件？

而walmart这起，周围那么多穿制服的了，不需要便衣再出示警徽。

[jhe123]

这是老领导提供的
“Legal Authority: As long as the plainclothes officer is properly identified as a law enforcement officer (e.g., carrying a badge and ID), they have full authority to conduct arrests.”

你这个不需要是巨巨公开发的EO，还是黄疮内部文件？

LOL，这条是指只有便衣参与的行动，需要向被执法对象出示警徽，证明自己是真的LEO。制服和便衣共同行动时，便衣就没这个证明自己的需要了。这种基本常识都不知道？

[Havana]

我就说的直白一点。

你们这些黄疮在联邦政府和州，个人有矛盾的时候就是联邦政府的bootlicker，本质上其实是待出柜的左左。

LOL，你这五毛，说不出实质内容了，就开始胡言乱语语无伦次扯不相干的。

[赖美豪中]

自信一点，当然是先抓住后提供啊。难道fbi冲进去，先让罪犯停一下，先炫一下badge? lol

这是老领导提供的
“Legal Authority: As long as the plainclothes officer is properly identified as a law enforcement officer (e.g., carrying a badge and ID), they have full authority to conduct arrests.”

你这个不需要是巨巨公开发的EO，还是黄疮内部文件？

[Havana]

chatgpt的内容是你提供的。

我不知道联邦执法人员都那么弱智，下车以前戴警徽都做不到。是不是巨巨现在ICE扩张太快，随便什么智商的都找进来。

自信一点，当然是先抓住后提供啊。难道fbi冲进去，先让罪犯停一下，先炫一下badge? lol

[赖美豪中]

当然是先把人抓起来再提供啊，难道抓人时候，还让对方先确定看清楚了badge么，这帮货得脑子都不知道有没有干活

LOL，这条是指只有便衣参与的行动，需要向被执法对象出示警徽，证明自己是真的LEO。制服和便衣共同行动时，便衣就没这个证明自己的需要了。这种基本常识都不知道？

[wmysh]

chatgpt的内容是你提供的。

我不知道联邦执法人员都那么弱智，下车以前戴警徽都做不到。是不是巨巨现在ICE扩张太快，随便什么智商的都找进来。

现在的ICE大概率是MAGA民兵。以前FBI对国内恐怖活动监控的重点对象。

[Havana]

美国人就是没有德国人严谨，连统一的brown shirt都不搞一套。

现在的ICE大概率是MAGA民兵。以前FBI对国内恐怖活动监控的重点对象。

[magagop]

你现在不坚持“非法移民非法入境美國本身就是聯邦重罪”？

未佩戴警徽的蒙面持枪便服和绑匪有什么区别，能执行哪门子的逮捕？

非法移民入境美國就是聯邦重罪，膽敢掩護非法移民阻礙聯邦探員執法的美國公民也同樣觸犯聯邦重罪，兩者都應該被懲罰。美國公民不是犯罪的護身符，非法移民更不是。我堅決支持Border Czar的強硬手段，應該在全美各地推廣。美國不是法外之地，更不是天堂，也不是燈塔。

[Havana]

你能对这个说法提供法律条款的来源么？
“非法移民入境美國就是聯邦重罪”

非法移民入境美國就是聯邦重罪，膽敢掩護非法移民阻礙聯邦探員執法的美國公民也同樣觸犯聯邦重罪，兩者都應該被懲罰。美國公民不是犯罪的護身符，非法移民更不是。我堅決支持Border Czar的強硬手段，應該在全美各地推廣。美國不是法外之地，更不是天堂，也不是燈塔。

[magagop]

我就说的直白一点。

你们这些黄疮在联邦政府和州，个人有矛盾的时候就是联邦政府的bootlicker，本质上其实是待出柜的左左。

你這種五毛，也應該被抓起來驅逐出境。