letsrock呢？快来，包叔又欺骗屁民了：China and 'reckless' US are heading for 'catastrophic' conflict if America...

[helpme]

“

China and 'reckless' America are heading for a 'catastrophic' conflict if Washington 'continues to speed down the wrong path,' a Beijing foreign minister warned on Tuesday in his first new conference since taking office.

Qin Gang lashed out at the US over deteriorating bilateral relations and Washington's support for Taiwan, while praising Beijing's growing ties to Moscow which he said 'set an example for global foreign relations'.

He also insinuated that America was undermining efforts for peace in Ukraine in order to extend the conflict for its own benefit, amid reports that China is considering sending arms to Russia to help with Vladimir Putin's brutal invasion.

In his wide-ranging press conference, he dismissed warnings from Western countries that China may supply Russia with arms, saying it would not accept 'blame-shifting, sanctions, suppression and threats' targeting Beijing.

His comments came as President Xi Jinping condemned what he branded an American-led 'suppression of China', as he urged the country's private sector to boost innovation and become more self-reliant.

”

[wanmeishijie]

你这个没说服力。因为秦刚说话软绵绵，并没有字面上那么强硬。
赵立坚则从语气到言辞，都很强硬，体现了我鳖的立场

[helpme]

你这个没说服力。因为秦刚说话软绵绵，并没有字面上那么强硬。
赵立坚则从语气到言辞，都很强硬，体现了我鳖的立场

CNN都没觉得秦刚有啥软绵绵的

[wanmeishijie]

CNN都没觉得秦刚有啥软绵绵的

白皮不懂中文，但是
白宫里的汉奸，一下就听出来了。

[zmimy]

没错。对中共当然是catastrophic

这有啥问题吗？

[helpme]

白皮不懂中文，但是
白宫里的汉奸，一下就听出来了。

你认识余茂春？

[helpme]

没错。对中共当然是catastrophic

这有啥问题吗？

文章里说的很清楚：'catastrophic' conflict

[flyingbeast]

这是外星人的剧本还是DS的剧本？
现在这局势是不是三哥要成本世纪最大赢家？

“

China and 'reckless' America are heading for a 'catastrophic' conflict if Washington 'continues to speed down the wrong path,' a Beijing foreign minister warned on Tuesday in his first new conference since taking office.

Qin Gang lashed out at the US over deteriorating bilateral relations and Washington's support for Taiwan, while praising Beijing's growing ties to Moscow which he said 'set an example for global foreign relations'.

He also insinuated that America was undermining efforts for peace in Ukraine in order to extend the conflict for its own benefit, amid reports that China is considering sending arms to Russia to help with Vladimir Putin's brutal invasion.

In his wide-ranging press conference, he dismissed warnings from Western countries that China may supply Russia with arms, saying it would not accept 'blame-shifting, sanctions, suppression and threats' targeting Beijing.

His comments came as President Xi Jinping condemned what he branded an American-led 'suppression of China', as he urged the country's private sector to boost innovation and become more self-reliant.

”

[bigball1]

没错。对中共当然是catastrophic

这有啥问题吗？

那你没爹等啥呢 大好机会啦

[letsrock]

不明白你想表达什么，这篇文章里有什么矛盾的地方吗？

秦刚再次否认中国向俄罗斯提供武器，这不正是我一直坚持的判断吗？

[helpme]

不明白你想表达什么，这篇文章里有什么矛盾的地方吗？

秦刚再次否认中国向俄罗斯提供武器，这不正是我一直坚持的判断吗？

我还是那个问题：如果包叔就是要跪美，为什么还要不停地跟美国放狠话？如果注定无法实现，必然是既丢面子又丢里子。最佳的例子就是去年佩洛西访台，事前包叔亲自警告拜登不要玩火，结果老巫婆平安成行，放军什么也没敢做。土共的脸不仅在全世界面前都被抽肿了，连国内屁民都一片骂声，最后包叔只能靠围台军演来试图挽回一点颜面

请你给叔一个合理的解释，包叔为啥要跪美跪到如此自虐？

[letsrock]

我还是那个问题：如果包叔就是要跪美，为什么还要不停地跟美国放狠话？如果注定无法实现，必然是既丢面子又丢里子。最佳的例子就是去年佩洛西访台，事前包叔亲自警告拜登不要玩火，结果老巫婆平安成行，放军什么也没敢做。土共的脸不仅在全世界面前都被抽肿了，连国内屁民都一片骂声，最后包叔只能靠围台军演来试图挽回一点颜面

请你给叔一个合理的解释，包叔为啥要跪美跪到如此自虐？

叔早就论述过多次，
如果要跪美，必须要通过战狼嘴炮实现。
鳖米两国政府一唱一和，嘴炮必须打得够响, 才能掩护桌面下的让利。

连续的战狼嘴炮，是米帝不断加码对中国制裁的必要条件

[nancy02]

秦刚：前段时间中美关系发生了无人飞艇事件。这完全是一起因不可抗力导致的偶发意外事件，事实和性质都很清楚，连美方也认为不构成现实威胁。然而，美方却违反国际法精神和国际惯例，有罪推断，过度反应，滥用武力，借题发挥，制造了一场本可以避免的外交危机。...

美方声称要“竞赢”中国但不寻求冲突。但实际上，美方的所谓“竞争”，就是全方位遏制打压，就是你死我活的零和博弈。美方口口声声说要遵守规则，但如同两位运动员在奥运田径场上赛跑，一方不是想着如何跑出自己的最好成绩，而总是要去绊倒对方，甚至想让对方参加残奥会，这不是公平竞争，而是恶意对抗，犯规了！美方所谓要给中美关系“加装护栏”“不冲突”，实际上就是要中国打不还手，骂不还口，但这办不到！如果美方不踩刹车，继续沿着错误道路狂飙下去，再多的护栏也挡不住脱轨翻车，必然陷入冲突对抗。

.....

“台独”分裂与台海和平稳定水火不容。台海和平稳定的真实威胁是“台独”分裂势力，定海神针是一个中国原则，真正护栏是中美三个联合公报。台湾问题处理不好，中美关系地动山摇。

....

秦刚：你提的这个问题很有意思。记得我刚到美国任大使时，美国的媒体惊呼，“中国战狼”来了。现在我回来当外长，又不给我这个称号了，我还真若有所失。其实，所谓“战狼外交”就是一个话语陷阱，制造这个话语陷阱的人，要么不懂中国和中国外交，要么无视事实，别有用心。

Is Qin,gang the best option for CCP as FM? He seems arrogant and shares the same world view as Xi, jinping.

When Qin,gang became US ambassador in 07/2021, US-China relationship made a dramatic downturn. Only after Xie,feng took over after 01/05/2023, US-China relation starts to recover to prior Qin,gang.

After Qin,gang was appointed to FM on 12/30/2022, his first trip to Africa, the easiest task, was plagued with problems immediately after he left. Immediately after his visit, US and Russian diplomats were rushing to Africa, as if Qin,gang told his Russian sponsor (cough Putin) what China brought?

His first call to South Korea was to ban SK visa. He has no diplomacy but full of hot air and is not suited for FM.

His handling of “Chinese balloon” incident created an unprecedent international crisis. And his firing of Zhuang, Guotai, the head of China Meteorological Administration, makes people suspect a move to make Zhuang a scapegoat. “Chinese balloon” incident is suspected to be an internal collaboration with Putin to help elicit a direct confrontation between US and China, at the height of Ukraine conflict. It is difficult watching him running Chinese foreign relations down to toilet. Every single time Putin stir the pot, Qin, gang took the bait and more, making already delicate international relationship even trickier.

His job history was bleak, and his job performance is abysmal. To be honest, it is almost unbelievable that a person with this kind of job performance can be selected into central committee without Putin’s help. As a KGB spy, Putin is expert in subversion, infiltration and sewing discourse. It is suspected that Putin was trying to influence some CCP leaders to make CCP politics work for Putin. And would it be wrong to assume that if Qin,Gang listen to his master (cough Putin) well and do a good job screwing China, he might be promoted to replace Putin-hater Xi?

[helpme]

叔早就论述过多次，
如果要跪美，必须要通过战狼嘴炮实现。
鳖米两国政府一唱一和，嘴炮必须打得够响, 才能掩护桌面下的让利。

话说清楚，谁让利给谁？

连续的战狼嘴炮，是米帝不断加码对中国制裁的必要条件

米帝不断加码对中国制裁，到底对包叔有啥好处？那不还是自虐吗？

[letsrock]

话说清楚，谁让利给谁？



米帝不断加码对中国制裁，到底对包叔有啥好处？那不还是自虐吗？

包叔不是连任了吗？

[helpme]

包叔不是连任了吗？

包叔17年开始主持修宪工作，18年初通过，就已经为连任铺平了道路，后面都只是走程序。而那时懂王还没有开打贸易战