玩笑开大了,流感疫苗降低疮瘟重症死亡风险90%
版主: Softfist
Re: 玩笑开大了,流感疫苗降低疮瘟重症死亡风险90%
"Time limit
How long this protection lasts is unclear. Among those in the Qatar study who had the flu jab and later contracted COVID-19, Abu-Raddad’s team recorded SARS-CoV-2 infections occurring, on average, about six weeks after vaccination. “I don’t expect to see this effect lasting long at all,” he says. Netea guesses that the benefits last for between six months and two years."
6month-2years, is that even longer than the covid vaccine? haha
How long this protection lasts is unclear. Among those in the Qatar study who had the flu jab and later contracted COVID-19, Abu-Raddad’s team recorded SARS-CoV-2 infections occurring, on average, about six weeks after vaccination. “I don’t expect to see this effect lasting long at all,” he says. Netea guesses that the benefits last for between six months and two years."
6month-2years, is that even longer than the covid vaccine? haha
-
- 论坛支柱
CanGuanGong 的博客 - 帖子互动: 390
- 帖子: 8865
- 注册时间: 2022年 7月 23日 18:05
Re: 玩笑开大了,流感疫苗降低疮瘟重症死亡风险90%
看到小粉红这么一惊一乍,哥亲自看了看。the number of severe cases was small in both groups,所以说这个90%意义不大。小粉红要多学点统计知识,nature这个只是篇新闻,目测作者也是有吸引眼球的目的,依据是一篇还在peer review中的文章,结果的置信区间是4.1-98.7%,lol
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... .full-text
Of the 127 PCR-positive cases who received influenza vaccination in the matched samples, only 1 progressed to severe, but none to critical or fatal COVID-19 (Figure 1). Meanwhile, of the 391 PCR-positive cases who did not receive influenza vaccination, 17 progressed to severe, 2 to critical, but none to fatal COVID-19. The estimated effectiveness of influenza vaccination against any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 88.9% (95% CI: 4.1-98.7%; Table 2).
顺便说一句,要是这个90%能经受住检验,最尴尬的难道不是土鳖的灭活么?lol
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... .full-text
Of the 127 PCR-positive cases who received influenza vaccination in the matched samples, only 1 progressed to severe, but none to critical or fatal COVID-19 (Figure 1). Meanwhile, of the 391 PCR-positive cases who did not receive influenza vaccination, 17 progressed to severe, 2 to critical, but none to fatal COVID-19. The estimated effectiveness of influenza vaccination against any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 88.9% (95% CI: 4.1-98.7%; Table 2).
顺便说一句,要是这个90%能经受住检验,最尴尬的难道不是土鳖的灭活么?lol
Re: 玩笑开大了,流感疫苗降低疮瘟重症死亡风险90%
兔子也没少推自家的疫苗,清零政策跟疫苗有没有用没有半毛钱关系VladPutin 写了: 2022年 8月 29日 11:02 兔子坚持认为疫苗处于试验阶段,预防效果待观察,所以一直执行清零政策。你鸦片爹100%赌注押在mRNA上,非常傻逼。
你这种二货半吊子装蒜。样品大于100不是小样本,已经足够用高斯分布。文章引用的95%置信区间相当于2 sigma,并非实验科学惯例,而且置信区间严重偏离高斯分布,显然做了引入了大的实验系统差,而这个误差很可能被严重高估。
Re: 玩笑开大了,流感疫苗降低疮瘟重症死亡风险90%
不是说为美帝疫苗洗地,中共灭活疫苗导致白血病,也很惨。新冠这玩意就不可能有有效疫苗。这是7年前就有的官方定论。
Re: 玩笑开大了,流感疫苗降低疮瘟重症死亡风险90%
绝不清零,应死尽死VladPutin 写了: 2022年 8月 29日 11:02 兔子坚持认为疫苗处于试验阶段,预防效果待观察,所以一直执行清零政策。你鸦片爹100%赌注押在mRNA上,非常傻逼。
你这种二货半吊子装蒜。样品大于100不是小样本,已经足够用高斯分布。文章引用的95%置信区间相当于2 sigma,并非实验科学惯例,而且置信区间严重偏离高斯分布,显然做了引入了大的实验系统差,而这个误差很可能被严重高估。
-
- 论坛支柱
CanGuanGong 的博客 - 帖子互动: 390
- 帖子: 8865
- 注册时间: 2022年 7月 23日 18:05
Re: 玩笑开大了,流感疫苗降低疮瘟重症死亡风险90%
你麻痹,小逼将一口一个爹,既然这样,你那个最讲科学的土鳖爹打灭活不是贱嘛!试验阶段都已经打了超过30亿支了,这就尴尬了。VladPutin 写了: 2022年 8月 29日 11:02 兔子坚持认为疫苗处于试验阶段,预防效果待观察,所以一直执行清零政策。你鸦片爹100%赌注押在mRNA上,非常傻逼。
你这种二货半吊子装蒜。样品大于100不是小样本,已经足够用高斯分布。文章引用的95%置信区间相当于2 sigma,并非实验科学惯例,而且置信区间严重偏离高斯分布,显然做了引入了大的实验系统差,而这个误差很可能被严重高估。