新未名空间

Why do you need to 算? It's given obviously on plain sigh on the graph you provided. Are you telling me not to trust the data given by you?
You can show me how to twist by 算.

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 01:09 看来你就是算不出来呗，诚实点承认了不就完了。

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 01:12 Why do you need to 算? It's given obviously on plain sigh on the graph you provided. Are you telling me not to trust the data given by you?
You can show me how to twist by 算.

行了，再瞎扯就无聊了。我正式断定你不会计算增长率。

Again, conclude without evidence. Looks you are used to it.

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 01:15 行了，再瞎扯就无聊了。我正式断定你不会计算增长率。

Here, it is data provided by you. Also, look at the growths rates between 1962 and 1970, they are lightyears better than those after 2002. Did the crime rates decreased during that period?

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 01:15 行了，再瞎扯就无聊了。我正式断定你不会计算增长率。

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 01:30 Here, it is data provided by you. Also, look at the growths rates between 1962 and 1970, they are lightyears better than those after 2002. Did the crime rates decreased during that period?

呵呵，但是除了会引用图表外，你自己就是算不出来。

Other than math, probably no other major requires more math than my major.
Anyway, do you agree with the 5.28% in 1985? Do you agree that the average growth of the twenty years prior to 2002 is higher than the average of the twenty years after 2002? Even just by eyeballing, you can tell the bars before 2002 are higher on average than those after 2002.

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 01:32 呵呵，但是除了会引用图表外，你自己就是算不出来。

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 01:47 Other than math, probably no other major requires more math than my major.
Anyway, do you agree with the 5.28% in 1985? Do you agree that the average growth of the twenty years prior to 2002 is higher than the average of the twenty years after 2002? Even just by eyeballing, you can tell the bars before 2002 are higher on average than those after 2002.

吹牛皮有啥用？既然数学这么好，咋就自己算不出来增长率？

The point is, why do you take off your pants to fart? Just to prove you know how to fart?
Let me ask you two simple questions. Do you still think that the decrease in crimes in Australia since 2002 is due to the rapid econ growth? Do you still think the average econ growth during the 20 years since 2002 is higher than the average 20 years prior to 2002?

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:03 吹牛皮有啥用？既然数学这么好，咋就自己算不出来增长率？

you asked me to show you something like 1 + 1 = 2, how am I supposed to do? I don't know if I should show you the elementary school way or the upper division college math way.

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:03 吹牛皮有啥用？既然数学这么好，咋就自己算不出来增长率？

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:19 you asked me to show you something like 1 + 1 = 2, how am I supposed to do? I don't know if I should show you the elementary school way or the upper division college math way.

呵呵，小学的呗，让大家看看你咋算的。对你来说应该不难吧？

Not interested in taking off my pants to fart. Feel free to do that if you want. By the way, do you trust the data you provided? If yes, why struck your head in your pants. If not, why provided it?

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:30 呵呵，小学的呗，让大家看看你咋算的。对你来说应该不难吧？

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:35 Not interested in taking off my pants to fart. Feel free to do that if you want. By the way, do you trust the data you provided? If yes, why struck your head in your pants. If not, why provided it?

说了半天，你还是算不出来啊。LOL。。。

Don't need to 算 since they are given. You can show us how to take off your pants and fart.
By the way, you want me to 算 and come up with a different answer. Then the problem is, these data is provided by you, but that does not mean that you are in the position to decide which part is right and which is not.

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:36 说了半天，你还是算不出来啊。LOL。。。

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:52 Don't need to 算 since they are given. You can show us how to take off your pants and fart.
By the way, you want me to 算 and come up with a different answer. Then the problem is, these data is provided by you, but that does not mean that you are in the position to decide which part is right and which is not.

原来是对自己的数学这么没信心，怕自己算错后被人挑刺。LOL，你早说啊。。。

I knew there would be "inconsistency". But why did you sound like you were winning? You were the one who provided this "inconsistent" data, weren't you? How does that make you a winner? Oh, btw, are they really inconsistent? What if the part you believe in is actually not that good?

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:55 原来是对自己的数学这么没信心，怕自己算错后被人挑刺。LOL，你早说啊。。。

Show me how you can calculate the real gdp growth rate from your gdp numbers without knowing the deflator. Right, my math does not give me enough confidence to calculate, or invent(?), it.
Looks like you have to conclude that Australia's drop in crimes after they banned guns in 2002 is caused by the slow down in gdp growth rates to be consistent with your first post in this thread. Or you are going to turn to your usual helper? COINCIDENCE?

jhe123 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 02:55 原来是对自己的数学这么没信心，怕自己算错后被人挑刺。LOL，你早说啊。。。

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 9月 28日 01:47 Other than math, probably no other major requires more math than my major.
Anyway, do you agree with the 5.28% in 1985? Do you agree that the average growth of the twenty years prior to 2002 is higher than the average of the twenty years after 2002? Even just by eyeballing, you can tell the bars before 2002 are higher on average than those after 2002.

赞！

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 9月 29日 02:06 Show me how you can calculate the real gdp growth rate from your gdp numbers without knowing the deflator. Right, my math does not give me enough confidence to calculate, or invent(?), it.
Looks like you have to conclude that Australia's drop in crimes after they banned guns in 2002 is caused by the slow down in gdp growth rates to be consistent with your first post in this thread. Or you are going to turn to your usual helper? COINCIDENCE?

好吧，看来你的数学没我想的那么差。但在realGDP和nominalGDP的用处上你又犯错误了。real GDP 是政府或者经济学家用来研究长期经济趋势的，对长期政策和学术范围内的研究有用。经济对社会的短期影响，nominal GDP 才是更合适的指标，因为nominal GDP是基于当时的市场价格，对于计算短期价值，确定收入和税收，发放工资，政府公司的财政预算，以及人们对经济的信心有着直接的影响。而犯罪是由当前情况决定的，没人会对比一下过去现在的经济来决定是否去偷去抢。所以考察经济对犯罪的影响，只能以nominal GDP为指标。

jhe123 写了： 2023年 10月 2日 09:49 好吧，看来你的数学没我想的那么差。但在realGDP和nominalGDP的用处上你又犯错误了。real GDP 是政府或者经济学家用来研究长期经济趋势的，对长期政策和学术范围内的研究有用。经济对社会的短期影响，nominal GDP 才是更合适的指标，因为nominal GDP是基于当时的市场价格，对于计算短期价值，确定收入和税收，发放工资，政府公司的财政预算，以及人们对经济的信心有着直接的影响。而犯罪是由当前情况决定的，没人会对比一下过去现在的经济来决定是否去偷去抢。所以考察经济对犯罪的影响，只能以nominal GDP为指标。

所以你的意思是拜登经济学，天天通胀的时候，犯罪率最低

resso 写了： 2023年 10月 2日 10:04 所以你的意思是拜登经济学，天天通胀的时候，犯罪率最低

现在的犯罪高发，和经济没有关系，而是猪党纵容犯罪的结果。