wh 写了: 2025年 5月 30日 15:18
川普要哈佛上交师生课程信息,不是因为种族歧视,是说哈佛支持学生反犹吧。反对以色列侵略巴勒斯坦不等于反犹,一些学生反对不等于所有学生反对,哈佛不制止学生按校规游行抗议,不等于哈佛支持反犹。川普对哈佛的指控本来就站不住脚。政府要求哈佛交游行抗议的学生材料,哈佛交了一些,政府说不够。具体怎么打的交道,我们外人也不知情。但政府要求学校上交所有师生和课程信息,还要干涉课程内容,既破坏隐私法,也破坏学术自由吧。
支持哈佛反对政府取消国际学生项目,也一样不等于支持哈佛的一切行为。国际学生包括中国人和没有入籍的华人。谁也不知道下一步会不会针对入籍的华人。在这一点上到底支持川普还是支持哈佛,应该很明确吧。
2nd
"The university said it did not seek to withdraw from the certification and said that while parts of Noem’s request used terms not defined in the immigration law that dictates what information universities must provide, “Harvard is committed to good faith compliance and is therefore producing responsive materials that we believe are reasonably required” by law.
According to Harvard’s lawsuit, the information included student identification numbers, names, dates of birth, countries of citizenship and enrolment information such as academic status, coursework and credit hours. Harvard also provided information about international students who left and why they left, which can cover a “range of reasons, including but not limited to disciplinary action”, Harvard’s email to DHS said.
On May 7, DHS responded saying the information Harvard provided “does not completely address the Secretary’s request”. It reiterated its original request.
Harvard responded on May 14 saying it was “not aware of any criminal convictions” of international students and identified three students who received disciplinary consequences.
As for students who deprived the rights of classmates, faculty or staff, Harvard said it did not find any."
There were Jewish students being harassed and there were "free speeches" being given "quietly" in the "noisy" lib. Are these considered "deprived the rights of classmates, faculty or staff"? "Harvard said it did not find any". Is it incapable or biased?
Up to your judgment
“It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so. “ – Mark Twain