Still have a hard beak? You were comparing econ to twenty or forty years ago. Nominal is not that meaningful. You don't say that twenty years ago you made $6.65 an hour and now $10 an hour, and therefore you feel you are much better off and happy and don't want to commit crime. Raise your salary by 50%, but at the same time price of everything goes up by 100%, are you stupid enough to feel you are better now?
So you still believe right after 2002 Australia was in a period of fast econ growth, compared to before 2002?
>>没人会对比一下过去现在的经济来决定是否去偷去抢
Everyone uses his/her buying power to 决定是否去偷去抢.
And you still bluff you know how to calculate the growth rate?
jhe123 写了: 2023年 10月 2日 09:49
好吧,看来你的数学没我想的那么差。但在realGDP和nominalGDP的用处上你又犯错误了。real GDP 是政府或者经济学家用来研究长期经济趋势的,对长期政策和学术范围内的研究有用。经济对社会的短期影响,nominal GDP 才是更合适的指标,因为nominal GDP是基于当时的市场价格,对于计算短期价值,确定收入和税收,发放工资,政府公司的财政预算,以及人们对经济的信心有着直接的影响。而犯罪是由当前情况决定的,没人会对比一下过去现在的经济来决定是否去偷去抢。所以考察经济对犯罪的影响,只能以nominal GDP为指标。