Re: 哈佛耶鲁不买高法的帐啊
发表于 : 2023年 6月 29日 15:19
说得好象现在不扔一样,还是公开地扔,理直气壮地扔。这都看不明白只能说斯德哥尔摩了吧。
说得好象现在不扔一样,还是公开地扔,理直气壮地扔。这都看不明白只能说斯德哥尔摩了吧。
这真的是基本理念的冲突,各有所执哦。我是觉得本来不必搞得那么对立的,不是没有共通的余地。只是被政党之争带歪了。
哈哈是吗?为啥?当时和菲律宾朋友相处时真觉得他们比大多数中国人单纯,爱唱爱笑,非常愉快。
亚裔读书太厉害了,光看成绩的话常春藤可以被亚裔包圆,哈哈。
哈佛脸皮厚不是第一天了。疫情开始,它第一个哭穷申请政府救助
这难道不是丫们教育失败,还敢往皮上找原因?wh. 写了: 2023年 6月 29日 15:37 亚裔读书太厉害了,光看成绩的话常春藤可以被亚裔包圆,哈哈。
以前还看到过耶鲁还是哪个名校的毕业生调查报告,亚裔大都从事技术性工作,对社会影响小;非裔学生人少,但从事社会活动的很多。名校期望学生有社会效应。当然学术贡献也吃香。
越有钱的人越懂生财之道
也不是嘴硬。官司输掉了总是要发个声明表示,虽然。。。但。。。wh. 写了: 2023年 6月 29日 13:51 所以哈耶校长就是嘴硬?我感觉大学招生没有硬指标,政策可以有各种诠释,灵活掌握,存乎一心;外人恐怕很难抓把柄。
不过高法的裁决很有意识形态之争的味道。还真难说是不是会影响招生,甚至大学核心理念。
或许大学能出台一些更具体的政策,比如不看种族,看家庭收入和教育等等,既避免种族争议,又符合大学多元化理念,两全……
热带人民,大多如此。以前宗主国又是喜欢享乐的。米国老白男的一大爱好就是去菲律宾度假,你们都懂得。。。
菲律宾是受西班牙殖民期的影响。很多呀,比如现任总统Marcos。
加上泰国。
没啥好厌恶的。生意而已。只是那些国家的产业是非法的(没错在泰国是非法的,只是政府默许),有很多是被黑社会控制的,身不由己,这就不人道了。欧洲就好多了,立法保护,你情我愿,赚快钱而已。sugarbabylove 写了: 2023年 6月 29日 16:48 加上泰国。
肯定有些人就是喜欢那里的气候,但是多数人什么目的,大家都心知肚明。
说实话我很厌恶。
不过国内也有男的去东南亚,然后带回来病就是了(医生同学告知)
感觉东南亚除了新加坡可能并不安全,去泰国会不会被绑架被卖器官之类的。sugarbabylove 写了: 2023年 6月 29日 16:48 加上泰国。
肯定有些人就是喜欢那里的气候,但是多数人什么目的,大家都心知肚明。
说实话我很厌恶。
不过国内也有男的去东南亚,然后带回来病就是了(医生同学告知)
亚裔读书好不知道是不是因为勤奋。我以前觉得是,可后来接触一些私校的白人学生,一样很拼,晚上两三点睡觉是家常便饭。不过他们读书也很好,不比班里的亚裔学生差。或许只是个例,私校的学生一般都刻苦。
欧巴?
啊。我一个好朋友从泰国旅游回来后说非常喜欢,她是女的,说泰国人很平和,各自安于自己的阶层,社会很有秩序?她自己是公司高管,可不喜欢激烈竞争,喜欢安静。sugarbabylove 写了: 2023年 6月 29日 16:48 加上泰国。
肯定有些人就是喜欢那里的气候,但是多数人什么目的,大家都心知肚明。
说实话我很厌恶。
不过国内也有男的去东南亚,然后带回来病就是了(医生同学告知)
wh. 写了: 2023年 6月 29日 13:09 早上看到高法否决哈佛和北卡大学的平权法案招生政策;不到中午,连续看到哈佛和耶鲁校长的公开信,都是表示大学的核心价值是多元化和包容,这一点绝不会变;耶鲁校长加了一句保证守法,招生办和各个学院将审核招生政策,法学院也会提供专家建议。
你们觉得以后的招生会有变化吗?如果不变,官司是不是会没完没了地打下去……
哈佛的公开信:
https://www.harvard.edu/admissionscase/ ... -decision/
Supreme Court Decision
Dear Members of the Harvard Community,
Today, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College. The Court held that Harvard College’s admissions system does not comply with the principles of the equal protection clause embodied in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The Court also ruled that colleges and universities may consider in admissions decisions “an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise.” We will certainly comply with the Court’s decision.
We write today to reaffirm the fundamental principle that deep and transformative teaching, learning, and research depend upon a community comprising people of many backgrounds, perspectives, and lived experiences. That principle is as true and important today as it was yesterday. So too are the abiding values that have enabled us—and every great educational institution—to pursue the high calling of educating creative thinkers and bold leaders, of deepening human knowledge, and of promoting progress, justice, and human flourishing.
We affirm that:
Because the teaching, learning, research, and creativity that bring progress and change require debate and disagreement, diversity and difference are essential to academic excellence.
To prepare leaders for a complex world, Harvard must admit and educate a student body whose members reflect, and have lived, multiple facets of human experience. No part of what makes us who we are could ever be irrelevant.
Harvard must always be a place of opportunity, a place whose doors remain open to those to whom they had long been closed, a place where many will have the chance to live dreams their parents or grandparents could not have dreamed.
For almost a decade, Harvard has vigorously defended an admissions system that, as two federal courts ruled, fully complied with longstanding precedent. In the weeks and months ahead, drawing on the talent and expertise of our Harvard community, we will determine how to preserve, consistent with the Court’s new precedent, our essential values.
The heart of our extraordinary institution is its people. Harvard will continue to be a vibrant community whose members come from all walks of life, all over the world. To our students, faculty, staff, researchers, and alumni—past, present, and future—who call Harvard your home, please know that you are, and always will be, Harvard. Your remarkable contributions to our community and the world drive Harvard’s distinction. Nothing today has changed that.
Sincerely,
Lawrence S. Bacow
President, Harvard University
Alan M. Garber
Provost, Harvard University
Meredith Weenick
Executive Vice President, Harvard University
Claudine Gay
Dean, Faculty of Arts and Sciences
President-elect, Harvard University
Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Dean, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study
Nancy Coleman
Dean, Division of Continuing Education and University Extension
George Q. Daley
Dean, Harvard Medical School
Srikant Datar
Dean, Harvard Business School
Emma Dench
Dean, Harvard Kenneth C. Griffin Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
Francis J. Doyle III
Dean, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Douglas Elmendorf
Dean, Harvard Kennedy School of Government
William V. Giannobile
Dean, Harvard School of Dental Medicine
David N. Hempton
Dean, Harvard Divinity School
Rakesh Khurana
Dean, Harvard College
Bridget Terry Long
Dean, Harvard Graduate School of Education
John F. Manning
Dean, Harvard Law School
Sarah M. Whiting
Dean, Graduate School of Design
Michelle A. Williams
Dean, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
欧巴=欧巴马,比大陆翻译的带胡人都硬绷绷满音“奥巴马”的发音准确一些。