IMHO, The government needs to do whatever it takes to let Americans having more babies.
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/ ... _permalink
Why JD Vance Worries About Childlessness
Republican vice presidential nominee has linked low fertility to high housing costs, social isolation and a lack of patriotism
冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
版主： alexwlt1024
版面规则
左也行，右也行，文明发帖就欢迎；粉也罢，黑也罢，互相尊重别谩骂。
左也行，右也行，文明发帖就欢迎；粉也罢，黑也罢，互相尊重别谩骂。
#42 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
参议员JD Vance认为美国人不愿意生育与厌恶风险和社会孤立文化有关，这可能会影响美国的经济活力。
自从成为唐纳德·特朗普的副总统候选人以来，这位俄亥俄州共和党人因批评没有孩子的人而受到关注。2021 年，他告诉福克斯新闻，美国正被“一群没有孩子的爱猫女士”统治着，她们对自己的生活和所做的选择感到痛苦，所以她们想让这个国家的其他人也痛苦。”他特别提到了副总统卡马拉·哈里斯，她现在是民主党的预期候选人。哈里斯已婚，有两个继子女。
去年加入参议院后，万斯成为最直言不讳地谈论美国生育率下降的议员之一。政府的临时数据显示，总生育率（即一名女性一生预计生育多少个孩子）去年降至 1.62，为有记录以来的最低水平，远低于在没有移民的情况下保持人口稳定所需的 2.1 的替代率。
这个问题一直是万斯的心头之患。今年 4 月，在接受《华尔街日报》采访时，万斯表示，生育率低下的原因有很多，没有简单的解决办法，除了劳动力减少和社会保障等计划的可持续性下降外，还会带来其他负面影响。
“显然，孩子们社交发展的一个非常重要的部分就是与其他孩子共度时光，”万斯说。但是，随着出生率的降低，“你的兄弟姐妹少了很多，你的堂兄弟姐妹也少了很多。我认为，童年的社会孤立感大大增强了。”
点击播放声音
《华尔街日报》的一项新民意调查调查了选民对副总统卡马拉·哈里斯的看法，她很可能成为民主党的候选人。以下是数据。图片说明：Cam Pollack
在采访中，万斯列举了导致出生率低的几个可能原因。他说，其中一个原因是经济因素：“我确实认为，家庭经济确实出现了问题，”万斯说，而传统的经济指标无法完全反映这一点。
他特别提到了高昂的住房成本。他说，在二战后的二十年里，一对夫妇可以凭借一份中产阶级收入购买一套 1,500 到 1,900 平方英尺的起步房。他说，如今美国建造的起步房规模并不大，即使是对于拥有两份中产阶级收入的人来说，市场上更大的起步房也远远超出了他们的承受范围。
他还将较低的出生率与成长过程中更加社会孤立的美国年轻人联系起来。“他们在一起度过的社交时间更少。他们约会的次数肯定不像以前那么多了。”这表现为“结婚率降低，朋友圈变小。”
万斯表示，生育率下降也可能是爱国主义情绪低落的结果。在生育率相对较高的以色列，“人们仍然从根本上热爱自己的国家，希望自己的国家继续前进。在 20 世纪 90 年代和 21 世纪，我们的欧洲朋友一直认为美国有点沙文主义。当时我们的生育率相当健康。现在我们更像我们的欧洲同行，与 20 或 30 年前相比，我们的爱国主义情绪大大降低，我们的生育率下降了。”
万斯列举了低生育率带来的几个负面后果。“我认为，技术活力的形成有赖于家庭和子女，这种现象很奇怪，”他指出，证据是上世纪 50 年代和 60 年代的婴儿潮、与之相关的社会和职场协作以及强劲的经济增长。
“如果你有孩子，你可能更愿意承担风险，而如果你没有家人，你可能就不太愿意承担风险，”他说。“所有这些非常奇怪且完全被低估的方式都会让我们的社会变得更糟。”
万斯还表示，虽然他强烈反对堕胎，但这与他对生育能力的担忧无关，他不认为获得堕胎服务是美国生育率下降的主要原因，因为其他实施更严格堕胎法的国家生育率下降幅度更大。“我认为两者之间有某种联系，但这种联系相当薄弱，”他说。
民主党人表示，万斯在父母身份和生育权利方面的立场可能会疏远女性选民，尤其是那些居住在战场州郊区的女性选民，她们在决定今年的总统大选时拥有巨大的影响力。
哈里斯党的发言人萨拉菲娜·奇蒂卡(Sarafina Chitika ) 表示：“特朗普、万斯和整个政党都明确表示，他们反对女性选择何时以何种方式建立家庭。”
广告
虽然万斯研究过韩国、法国、匈牙利和日本等国的生育政策，但他表示，目前还没有看到任何解决生育率下降问题的明确办法。“匈牙利让我着迷……因为他们正在积极尝试很多不同的事情。我认为其中一些正在奏效。”他说，美国应该像匈牙利那样考虑降低生育多子女女性的所得税税率。
在担任参议员之前的 2021 年一次采访中，万斯曾表示，没有孩子的人应该比有孩子的人缴纳更高的税率。（现行税法中的一些条款，如儿童税收抵免，就有这种效果。）
万斯在 4 月份接受《华尔街日报》采访时表示，增加移民并不是解决出生率低问题的办法。原因之一是移民自身的生育率往往与本土出生人口相似。他说，另一个原因是，一旦一个国家的外来人口比例超过 15%，就会引发强烈反应和社会分裂，也会使同化更加困难。
“这就像邀请家人来家里吃饭和邀请陌生人来家里吃饭的区别，”万斯说。“邀请新朋友来家里吃饭是件好事。但你需要有让其他人融入的核心，否则我认为这会彻底改变你的社会性质。”
自从成为唐纳德·特朗普的副总统候选人以来，这位俄亥俄州共和党人因批评没有孩子的人而受到关注。2021 年，他告诉福克斯新闻，美国正被“一群没有孩子的爱猫女士”统治着，她们对自己的生活和所做的选择感到痛苦，所以她们想让这个国家的其他人也痛苦。”他特别提到了副总统卡马拉·哈里斯，她现在是民主党的预期候选人。哈里斯已婚，有两个继子女。
去年加入参议院后，万斯成为最直言不讳地谈论美国生育率下降的议员之一。政府的临时数据显示，总生育率（即一名女性一生预计生育多少个孩子）去年降至 1.62，为有记录以来的最低水平，远低于在没有移民的情况下保持人口稳定所需的 2.1 的替代率。
这个问题一直是万斯的心头之患。今年 4 月，在接受《华尔街日报》采访时，万斯表示，生育率低下的原因有很多，没有简单的解决办法，除了劳动力减少和社会保障等计划的可持续性下降外，还会带来其他负面影响。
“显然，孩子们社交发展的一个非常重要的部分就是与其他孩子共度时光，”万斯说。但是，随着出生率的降低，“你的兄弟姐妹少了很多，你的堂兄弟姐妹也少了很多。我认为，童年的社会孤立感大大增强了。”
点击播放声音
《华尔街日报》的一项新民意调查调查了选民对副总统卡马拉·哈里斯的看法，她很可能成为民主党的候选人。以下是数据。图片说明：Cam Pollack
在采访中，万斯列举了导致出生率低的几个可能原因。他说，其中一个原因是经济因素：“我确实认为，家庭经济确实出现了问题，”万斯说，而传统的经济指标无法完全反映这一点。
他特别提到了高昂的住房成本。他说，在二战后的二十年里，一对夫妇可以凭借一份中产阶级收入购买一套 1,500 到 1,900 平方英尺的起步房。他说，如今美国建造的起步房规模并不大，即使是对于拥有两份中产阶级收入的人来说，市场上更大的起步房也远远超出了他们的承受范围。
他还将较低的出生率与成长过程中更加社会孤立的美国年轻人联系起来。“他们在一起度过的社交时间更少。他们约会的次数肯定不像以前那么多了。”这表现为“结婚率降低，朋友圈变小。”
万斯表示，生育率下降也可能是爱国主义情绪低落的结果。在生育率相对较高的以色列，“人们仍然从根本上热爱自己的国家，希望自己的国家继续前进。在 20 世纪 90 年代和 21 世纪，我们的欧洲朋友一直认为美国有点沙文主义。当时我们的生育率相当健康。现在我们更像我们的欧洲同行，与 20 或 30 年前相比，我们的爱国主义情绪大大降低，我们的生育率下降了。”
万斯列举了低生育率带来的几个负面后果。“我认为，技术活力的形成有赖于家庭和子女，这种现象很奇怪，”他指出，证据是上世纪 50 年代和 60 年代的婴儿潮、与之相关的社会和职场协作以及强劲的经济增长。
“如果你有孩子，你可能更愿意承担风险，而如果你没有家人，你可能就不太愿意承担风险，”他说。“所有这些非常奇怪且完全被低估的方式都会让我们的社会变得更糟。”
万斯还表示，虽然他强烈反对堕胎，但这与他对生育能力的担忧无关，他不认为获得堕胎服务是美国生育率下降的主要原因，因为其他实施更严格堕胎法的国家生育率下降幅度更大。“我认为两者之间有某种联系，但这种联系相当薄弱，”他说。
民主党人表示，万斯在父母身份和生育权利方面的立场可能会疏远女性选民，尤其是那些居住在战场州郊区的女性选民，她们在决定今年的总统大选时拥有巨大的影响力。
哈里斯党的发言人萨拉菲娜·奇蒂卡(Sarafina Chitika ) 表示：“特朗普、万斯和整个政党都明确表示，他们反对女性选择何时以何种方式建立家庭。”
广告
虽然万斯研究过韩国、法国、匈牙利和日本等国的生育政策，但他表示，目前还没有看到任何解决生育率下降问题的明确办法。“匈牙利让我着迷……因为他们正在积极尝试很多不同的事情。我认为其中一些正在奏效。”他说，美国应该像匈牙利那样考虑降低生育多子女女性的所得税税率。
在担任参议员之前的 2021 年一次采访中，万斯曾表示，没有孩子的人应该比有孩子的人缴纳更高的税率。（现行税法中的一些条款，如儿童税收抵免，就有这种效果。）
万斯在 4 月份接受《华尔街日报》采访时表示，增加移民并不是解决出生率低问题的办法。原因之一是移民自身的生育率往往与本土出生人口相似。他说，另一个原因是，一旦一个国家的外来人口比例超过 15%，就会引发强烈反应和社会分裂，也会使同化更加困难。
“这就像邀请家人来家里吃饭和邀请陌生人来家里吃饭的区别，”万斯说。“邀请新朋友来家里吃饭是件好事。但你需要有让其他人融入的核心，否则我认为这会彻底改变你的社会性质。”
#44 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
现在民主党及其拥趸以前所未见的声势大肆攻击 Vance，让人有点看不懂。
一个可能的解释是他太有政治前途了，使得民主党害怕。他现在才38岁，作为共和党议员，是参议院少有的可以和民主党共同提出议案解决实际问题的人。他同时也支持现任民主党 FTC chair Lina Khan所进行一系列反垄断的工作，Khan只有30岁，少有的两党都认可的新人。
一个可能的解释是他太有政治前途了，使得民主党害怕。他现在才38岁，作为共和党议员，是参议院少有的可以和民主党共同提出议案解决实际问题的人。他同时也支持现任民主党 FTC chair Lina Khan所进行一系列反垄断的工作，Khan只有30岁，少有的两党都认可的新人。
ilovemynight 写了： 2024年 7月 20日 13:24 你说的这个努力工作，有点像共产党告诉中国农民工，你们的不幸都是因为你们不努力工作，或者你们不够聪明。
我平常还是很欣赏你的发言，而且也是非常讨厌川普的为人，但是对于你说的这个问题，我们作为第一代移民还是要open minded, 多看多听。
下面这个链接里说了很多民主党，包括Obama, Biden, Harris, etc. 之流的 hypocrisy. 作者是个民主党人，好像还是犹太裔：
两党的建制派实际上是狼狈为奸，对很多严重的社会问题都是和大公司穿一条裤子，听之任之，最后让川普这种民粹主义成为潮流。
Vance这种人底层长大，当过兵，至少知道普通美国人的疾苦，要远比那些出身于富豪的政客们靠谱，那些人给人的感觉就是“何不食肉糜”，整天纠缠于绝大多数人并不关心的什么LGBT 等等，等等。作为移民，其实底层美国老百姓的问题越早解决对我们越好，拖的越严重，到时候backfire的越厉害。
下面这个文章是关于Vance在参议院作为GOP的出乎意料的一些议案：
https://www.leefang.com/p/jd-vances-pop ... -corporate
#45 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
美国的 woke population 就需要Vance这种乍听很刺耳但实际上就是 common sense的再教育，就像范进的老丈人要掌掴范进一样。
不生孩子，美国就没有未来，不养孩子的人就应该多交税。
不生孩子，美国就没有未来，不养孩子的人就应该多交税。
x1
#46 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
就是为了你自己的幸福，也应该养个孩子，就连Pete the Secretary of Transportation 也在和他的丈夫领养孩子。ilovemynight 写了： 2024年 7月 31日 09:42 美国的 woke population 就需要Vance这种乍听很刺耳但实际上就是 common sense的再教育，就像范进的老丈人要掌掴范进一样。
不生孩子，美国就没有未来，不养孩子的人就应该多交税。
这是一个高中生的感悟：
NC CHINESE AMERICANS FOR TRUMP 
#51 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
David Marcus
@davidmarcus
I am crossing the Rubicon and backing the Republican Party and President Trump.
Many — including a former version of myself — get trapped in a mental framework that becomes their identity and prevents them from radically evolving their thinking with new facts and information. I finally broke free from it.
My journey has been a gradual political 180 from where I stood in every previous election. It has been an eye-opening process of disenchantment, zero-basing lifelong beliefs, and rebuilding from there.
In 2017, a good friend enlisted me to pitch the DNC to raise $100M from Silicon Valley founders and executives. The aim was to use these funds and know-how to build a CRM and tech platform to prevent a repeat of Hillary Clinton’s inadequate, outdated 2016 campaign. We met with DNC leadership, who told us we could raise that money, but it would have to go to the general fund; a single-digit percentage would then be allocated to tech. In the wake of one of their most shocking failures, they didn’t want the help.
The next series of realizations began in 2019 while I was at Meta, right after we announced the Libra white paper. I testified before the Senate and the House and subsequently spent significant time in DC, engaging with lawmakers, cabinet members, regulators, and two White House administrations. At the time, I still believed the mainstream idea that Democrats were all about serving the People. However, I was shocked to learn that, for the most part, Republicans cared more deeply about their constituents, while Democrats, in my experience, cared more about government power and control. This is my observation on balance, with many stories to back it up. I also found that more Republicans wanted to understand our project’s goals and took the time to learn about the risks of censoring payments and controlling the network. I found myself remarkably aligned with them.
Then COVID came, revealing more. While I don’t subscribe to the most malicious vaccine conspiracy theories, I do take offense at the censorship machine put in place to hide the origin of the virus from the NIH-funded Wuhan lab and all dissenting voices on vaccinations and lockdowns. At that time, I fully appreciated why Republicans value freedom of speech and preventing censorship.
This trend of spinning and manufacturing a parallel reality to serve the Dem agenda, solidified by complicit mainstream media, hit home with the Hunter Biden laptop story, the coordinated vilification of President Trump and his followers, and President Biden’s cognitive decline — depriving voters of a voice in a proper primary. These examples displayed the hubris of the current Dem leadership. You must think the American people are fools to believe the spin on these issues. I despise this elite vs. general population ideology viscerally.
This version of the Democratic Party is sidelining moderates and centrists and has adopted an increasingly leftist ideology. This drift to the left has dictated policies from which I’ve found myself estranged.
On the domestic front, there has been a total departure from the core American value system of meritocracy, an extreme and weaponized DEI agenda, an open door to massive illegal immigration, and a once-fringe narrative, now mainstream within the party, of vilifying success. This shift is also causing us to fall behind due to an anti-innovation regulatory climate, notably on crypto and soon AI — two non-linear technological breakthroughs that will likely determine tomorrow’s leading countries.
On foreign policy, the administration is exacerbating tensions with Russia through an aggressive NATO expansion narrative focused on Ukraine and prolonging an unwinnable war. This is costing American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, the world hundreds of thousands of lives, depleting the U.S. military arsenal and risking World War III. On Iran, this administration is continuing a misguided Obama-era plan to bring Iran closer to the West by unfreezing Trump-era sanctions, thus giving the Mollahs’ regime the ability to fund terrorism and pursue its anti-America, anti-Israel, and anti-Jewish agenda. The withdrawal from Afghanistan was also handled disastrously. We’re leaving a door open for China to invade Taiwan by coming across as weak. Most importantly to me, concerning Israel, the administration is enabling Iran to fund Hamas and Hezbollah, restraining Israel in its fight against its enemies, thus prolonging another conflict, which is costing more lives on both sides and allowing unprecedented levels of antisemitism to rise at home.
I believe we need a President who is unequivocally pro: America, the Constitution, business, Bitcoin/crypto, innovation, Israel, small government, legal immigration, free speech, meritocracy, and common sense — and anti: regulatory proliferation, illegal immigration, unjust wars, Iran’s current regime, and domestic groups that oppose American values. These issues are central to President Trump’s platform.
Naturally, I disagree with President Trump and the GOP on some issues, particularly women’s reproductive rights. While I’ve come to learn that extreme views exist in both parties, I firmly believe that women should have the unalienable right to make their own decisions on this polarizing topic. President Trump confirmed he was against a national abortion ban and supported the Supreme Court’s decision on maintaining access to mifepristone, which was reassuring and a sign that the party was moving closer to the center.
It’s impossible to close this post without mentioning President Trump’s recent assassination attempt. The courage and resolve he displayed seconds after being hit by a bullet was awe-inspiring for his followers and detractors alike. This was a man, however imperfect, who, at that moment, incarnated the American spirit in the most vivid way, starting to bring a split nation together.
Some claim that reelecting President Trump will bring our democracy to its knees. However, the alternative — having unelected individuals with this much power and no accountability run our government coupled with four more years of bad policies at home and abroad — might present a more significant threat. Neither will likely change in a Harris administration and could potentially worsen.
In this pivotal moment, confronted with the choices we have, I am endorsing and supporting a return to a Republican administration in 2025.
@davidmarcus
I am crossing the Rubicon and backing the Republican Party and President Trump.
Many — including a former version of myself — get trapped in a mental framework that becomes their identity and prevents them from radically evolving their thinking with new facts and information. I finally broke free from it.
My journey has been a gradual political 180 from where I stood in every previous election. It has been an eye-opening process of disenchantment, zero-basing lifelong beliefs, and rebuilding from there.
In 2017, a good friend enlisted me to pitch the DNC to raise $100M from Silicon Valley founders and executives. The aim was to use these funds and know-how to build a CRM and tech platform to prevent a repeat of Hillary Clinton’s inadequate, outdated 2016 campaign. We met with DNC leadership, who told us we could raise that money, but it would have to go to the general fund; a single-digit percentage would then be allocated to tech. In the wake of one of their most shocking failures, they didn’t want the help.
The next series of realizations began in 2019 while I was at Meta, right after we announced the Libra white paper. I testified before the Senate and the House and subsequently spent significant time in DC, engaging with lawmakers, cabinet members, regulators, and two White House administrations. At the time, I still believed the mainstream idea that Democrats were all about serving the People. However, I was shocked to learn that, for the most part, Republicans cared more deeply about their constituents, while Democrats, in my experience, cared more about government power and control. This is my observation on balance, with many stories to back it up. I also found that more Republicans wanted to understand our project’s goals and took the time to learn about the risks of censoring payments and controlling the network. I found myself remarkably aligned with them.
Then COVID came, revealing more. While I don’t subscribe to the most malicious vaccine conspiracy theories, I do take offense at the censorship machine put in place to hide the origin of the virus from the NIH-funded Wuhan lab and all dissenting voices on vaccinations and lockdowns. At that time, I fully appreciated why Republicans value freedom of speech and preventing censorship.
This trend of spinning and manufacturing a parallel reality to serve the Dem agenda, solidified by complicit mainstream media, hit home with the Hunter Biden laptop story, the coordinated vilification of President Trump and his followers, and President Biden’s cognitive decline — depriving voters of a voice in a proper primary. These examples displayed the hubris of the current Dem leadership. You must think the American people are fools to believe the spin on these issues. I despise this elite vs. general population ideology viscerally.
This version of the Democratic Party is sidelining moderates and centrists and has adopted an increasingly leftist ideology. This drift to the left has dictated policies from which I’ve found myself estranged.
On the domestic front, there has been a total departure from the core American value system of meritocracy, an extreme and weaponized DEI agenda, an open door to massive illegal immigration, and a once-fringe narrative, now mainstream within the party, of vilifying success. This shift is also causing us to fall behind due to an anti-innovation regulatory climate, notably on crypto and soon AI — two non-linear technological breakthroughs that will likely determine tomorrow’s leading countries.
On foreign policy, the administration is exacerbating tensions with Russia through an aggressive NATO expansion narrative focused on Ukraine and prolonging an unwinnable war. This is costing American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, the world hundreds of thousands of lives, depleting the U.S. military arsenal and risking World War III. On Iran, this administration is continuing a misguided Obama-era plan to bring Iran closer to the West by unfreezing Trump-era sanctions, thus giving the Mollahs’ regime the ability to fund terrorism and pursue its anti-America, anti-Israel, and anti-Jewish agenda. The withdrawal from Afghanistan was also handled disastrously. We’re leaving a door open for China to invade Taiwan by coming across as weak. Most importantly to me, concerning Israel, the administration is enabling Iran to fund Hamas and Hezbollah, restraining Israel in its fight against its enemies, thus prolonging another conflict, which is costing more lives on both sides and allowing unprecedented levels of antisemitism to rise at home.
I believe we need a President who is unequivocally pro: America, the Constitution, business, Bitcoin/crypto, innovation, Israel, small government, legal immigration, free speech, meritocracy, and common sense — and anti: regulatory proliferation, illegal immigration, unjust wars, Iran’s current regime, and domestic groups that oppose American values. These issues are central to President Trump’s platform.
Naturally, I disagree with President Trump and the GOP on some issues, particularly women’s reproductive rights. While I’ve come to learn that extreme views exist in both parties, I firmly believe that women should have the unalienable right to make their own decisions on this polarizing topic. President Trump confirmed he was against a national abortion ban and supported the Supreme Court’s decision on maintaining access to mifepristone, which was reassuring and a sign that the party was moving closer to the center.
It’s impossible to close this post without mentioning President Trump’s recent assassination attempt. The courage and resolve he displayed seconds after being hit by a bullet was awe-inspiring for his followers and detractors alike. This was a man, however imperfect, who, at that moment, incarnated the American spirit in the most vivid way, starting to bring a split nation together.
Some claim that reelecting President Trump will bring our democracy to its knees. However, the alternative — having unelected individuals with this much power and no accountability run our government coupled with four more years of bad policies at home and abroad — might present a more significant threat. Neither will likely change in a Harris administration and could potentially worsen.
In this pivotal moment, confronted with the choices we have, I am endorsing and supporting a return to a Republican administration in 2025.
#52 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
就凭你的话，你是左儿
ilovemynight 写了： 2024年 7月 26日 16:45 第一季，pussy grabber vs dementia
pussy grabber 胜出
眼看着美帝的选举是，黄鼠狼下崽，一窝不如一窝，唉。
共产党就是赤裸裸黑手党
#54 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
欢迎投票给RFK
There are two ways to conquer and enslave a country. One is by the sword. The other is by debt. - John Adams
#55 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
RFK本质上还是民主党。
我现在已经不看人了，只为政策投票。今年就反DEI, single issue voter，谁反DEI, 我就投谁。在DEI的腐蚀下，美国正在以肉眼可见的速度堕落， 再搞下去，国将不国了。
我现在已经不看人了，只为政策投票。今年就反DEI, single issue voter，谁反DEI, 我就投谁。在DEI的腐蚀下，美国正在以肉眼可见的速度堕落， 再搞下去，国将不国了。
x1
#56 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
dei的本质是破坏司法，破坏公序良俗，而dei不是猪党个人是猪党整个party的理念内核。猪党无论谁上台必然遵循服从党派意志。ilovemynight 写了： 2024年 8月 1日 13:03 RFK本质上还是民主党。
我现在已经不看人了，只为政策投票。今年就反DEI, single issue voter，谁反DEI, 我就投谁。在DEI的腐蚀下，美国正在以肉眼可见的速度堕落， 再搞下去，国将不国了。
#57 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamane ... le/2821693
Trust in Physicians and Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a 50-State Survey of US Adults
美国人对医院/医生的信任从72%降到40% （4/2020—1/2024）
相比而言，对政客的信任度远远低于这个数字，所以不要相信任何对某一个政客的狂热宣传。
Trust in Physicians and Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a 50-State Survey of US Adults
美国人对医院/医生的信任从72%降到40% （4/2020—1/2024）
相比而言，对政客的信任度远远低于这个数字，所以不要相信任何对某一个政客的狂热宣传。
x1
#58 Re: 冷眼旁观2024年美国大选
要不是死难者家属的强烈反弹，911的策划者居然被Biden政府免除死刑了 
Following Massive Controversy and Anger from 9/11 Survivors and their Families, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has Revoked a Plea Deal which had been decided by DoD Lawyers and Approved by a Military Tribunal, which would have seen Three Former Al-Qaeda Terrorists who planned the 9/11 Attacks; Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid bin Attash, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi, having pled Guilty in order to receive a Life Sentence at Guantanamo Bay instead of the Death Penalty.
Following Massive Controversy and Anger from 9/11 Survivors and their Families, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has Revoked a Plea Deal which had been decided by DoD Lawyers and Approved by a Military Tribunal, which would have seen Three Former Al-Qaeda Terrorists who planned the 9/11 Attacks; Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid bin Attash, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi, having pled Guilty in order to receive a Life Sentence at Guantanamo Bay instead of the Death Penalty.