新未名空间

Source?
Bureau of Justice Statistics under Department of Justice reports that "In 2011, a total of 478,400 fatal and nonfatal violent crimes were committed with a firearm"
---https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf

Then AFT (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) reports that "490,800 crime guns were traced back to their origins by the National Tracing Center in FY 2020."
---https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/fac ... nters-cgic

Though these two numbers come from different years, it seems most of the guns used in violent crimes can be traced back to their origins.

langrener1 写了： 2023年 5月 11日 12:10 美国第一步要做的是加强现有法律的执行，对使用黑枪的涉枪案件不要因为肤色而姑息。然后再谈进一步立法控枪。否则，现在都是有法不依，再多立法有个屁用

你丫究竟有证据还是咧咧？

美国绝大部分枪杀案都是自杀和单个谋杀，能不能查查基本数据再开牙

At least the majority of the mass shootings (FBI's definition) were committed with guns legally obtained.



--https://www.statista.com/statistics/476 ... s-weapons/

40年，140起mass shooting。 平均一年3.5起。这根本不像作弊媒体渲染的那么厉害。其中1/3的枪是非法的。合法的里面也许还包括那些stoled from family member，严格来讲，shooter是用非法的枪支。

笑尿了，这就是49人的英文和逻辑水平，人家说所有枪案，他去查mass shooting, lol

fortyNiner 写了： 2023年 5月 12日 01:18 At least the majority of the mass shootings (FBI's definition) were committed with guns legally obtained.



--https://www.statista.com/statistics/476 ... s-weapons/

这些蠢货连sandy hook的枪都算是合法买的，你还和他们说啥。按照这个sb逻辑所有的枪都是合法的，反正出厂卖得时候都是合法的

HBBH 写了： 2023年 5月 12日 01:39 40年，140起mass shooting。 平均一年3.5起。这根本不像作弊媒体渲染的那么厉害。其中1/3的枪是非法的。合法的里面也许还包括那些stoled from family member，严格来讲，shooter是用非法的枪支。

Did you see the "at least"?
Did you see my post before that one?

赖美豪中 写了： 2023年 5月 12日 01:40 笑尿了，这就是49人的英文和逻辑水平，人家说所有枪案，他去查mass shooting, lol

There are different definitions of mass shooting. One definition is at least four killed, excluding gang killings, domestic violence, or terrorist acts sponsored by an organization.
Gun Violence Archive defines it as any with at least four killed or injured. The 211-mass-shootings-so-far-this-year is using GVA's definition.

HBBH 写了： 2023年 5月 12日 01:39 40年，140起mass shooting。 平均一年3.5起。这根本不像作弊媒体渲染的那么厉害。其中1/3的枪是非法的。合法的里面也许还包括那些stoled from family member，严格来讲，shooter是用非法的枪支。

Does it make any difference? You legally buy it, and then your family member can use it any time they want. Does it matter if you call your family member's act legal or illegal? It does not make a difference. It does not change the Fact of easy access to guns.

赖美豪中 写了： 2023年 5月 12日 01:42 这些蠢货连sandy hook的枪都算是合法买的，你还和他们说啥。按照这个sb逻辑所有的枪都是合法的，反正出厂卖得时候都是合法的

langrener1 写了： 2023年 5月 11日 12:10 美国第一步要做的是加强现有法律的执行，对使用黑枪的涉枪案件不要因为肤色而姑息。然后再谈进一步立法控枪。否则，现在都是有法不依，再多立法有个屁用

德州这次就是合法枪支

Also, when it's easy to obtain something legally, it's also easy to obtain them illegally. It's also the reason why so many guns are lost each year. It's no big deal, just get another one, right?

But both cdc and fbi stats indicate that the homicide rates in states with higher gun ownership are much higher. Are 禁枪令 in those states 一个比一个严格?

langrener1 写了： 2023年 5月 12日 10:05 美国各个城市每天晚上打死的小黑，都没人关心，没人报道，绝大多数是死于黑枪。搞笑的是，这些城市的禁枪令一个比一个严格