U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) 历史上只被高院推翻过一次使用法律地判例。除非高院能判tariff不归cit管,which is impossible
A notable example is the case of United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. (1999). In this case, the Supreme Court reversed a decision by the CIT, holding that regulations issued by the U.S. Customs Service are entitled to judicial deference under the Chevron doctrine. This decision clarified the extent to which courts should defer to administrative agencies in interpreting statutes they administer, particularly in the context of customs classifications.
聚聚地解放日基本大势已去了
版主: alexwlt1024
版面规则
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
#2 Re: 聚聚地解放日基本大势已去了
你这个假川粉赖美豪中 写了: 2025年 6月 2日 00:25 U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) 历史上只被高院推翻过一次使用法律地判例。除非高院能判tariff不归cit管,which is impossible
A notable example is the case of United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. (1999). In this case, the Supreme Court reversed a decision by the CIT, holding that regulations issued by the U.S. Customs Service are entitled to judicial deference under the Chevron doctrine. This decision clarified the extent to which courts should defer to administrative agencies in interpreting statutes they administer, particularly in the context of customs classifications.
提交的表单无效,请再提交一次。sever error
#5 Re: 聚聚地解放日基本大势已去了
极少,高院受理不受理都是问题。而且高院接了也几乎是必输地案子,最多得3票,没有任何胜算
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.