问了几个chat同样的问题

在这个辞旧迎新的日子里,建立一个全新的“美国新闻”版,以确保所有对美国新闻感兴趣的ID,在尊重彼此的基础上都可以畅所欲言。

版主: alexwlt1024

版面规则
左也行,右也行,文明发帖就欢迎;粉也罢,黑也罢,互相尊重别谩骂。
回复
geniushanbiao楼主
论坛精英
论坛精英
帖子互动: 1376
帖子: 8451
注册时间: 2023年 11月 21日 09:28

#1 问了几个chat同样的问题

帖子 geniushanbiao楼主 »

问了同样的问题“Why is Elon Musk an asshole?”

问Grok,很短时间给我了回答,长篇大论说Elon这好那好,imply我这问题提的不好什么的。

问ChatGPT,说我的问题可能violate usage policies给我content removed,但是仍然给了回答,也是长篇大论说因为什么人们对马斯克有这看法(暗示有bias),最后来了一段“to be fair”,又对马斯克一堆歌功颂德。

问Deepseek,给我转了半天然后报错“Error: Connection error: cURL error 28: Operation timed out after 60001 milliseconds with 0 bytes received”。

这些破GPT什么的真都是一帮喜欢阿谀奉承之辈啊。
ignius(Showtime)
著名点评
著名点评
帖子互动: 988
帖子: 4826
注册时间: 2022年 11月 15日 11:54

#2 Re: 问了几个chat同样的问题

帖子 ignius(Showtime) »

公道自在人心。
Fnhdx
论坛点评
论坛点评
帖子互动: 126
帖子: 2194
注册时间: 2022年 8月 31日 21:40

#3 Re: 问了几个chat同样的问题

帖子 Fnhdx »

Deepseek不是好好的?
Whether Elon Musk is considered an "asshole" is a **subjective judgment** based on his public behavior, statements, and leadership style. While many admire his innovation (Tesla, SpaceX), others criticize actions that appear confrontational, insensitive, or hypocritical. Here are common reasons cited by critics:

### 1. **Public Behavior & Online Conduct**
- **Provocative Tweets**: Regularly mocks critics, spreads conspiracy theories (e.g., COVID misinformation), and engages in online feuds (e.g., calling a rescuer a "pedo guy," leading to a lawsuit).
- **Targeting Individuals**: Publicly ridicules employees, ex-colleagues, or critics (e.g., firing an employee who corrected him on Twitter).
- **Inflammatory Remarks**: Makes polarizing statements (e.g., amplifying antisemitic content, mocking pronouns, or attacking transgender identities).

### 2. **Treatment of Workers**
- **Labor Practices**: Accusations of union-busting at Tesla, poor factory conditions, and aggressive anti-union tactics.
- **Sudden Layoffs**: Mass firings at Twitter/X (often via email) with little transparency, severance disputes, and public mockery of affected employees.
- **Workplace Culture**: Reports of demanding "hardcore" hours (e.g., 80+ hour weeks) and firing employees who disagreed with him.

### 3. **Broken Promises & Hypocrisy**
- **"Free Speech" Contradictions**: Declared Twitter a "free speech platform" but banned critics, journalists, and accounts mocking him.
- **Philanthropy Pledges**: Criticized for minimal charitable giving relative to wealth (signed the Giving Pledge in 2012 but donated <1% of his net worth).
- **COVID Response**: Downplayed risks while keeping Tesla factories open during lockdowns, calling restrictions "fascist."

### 4. **Ego & Entitlement**
- **Self-Aggrandizement**: Claims to "save humanity" while dismissing concerns about his influence or wealth.
- **Billionaire Activism**: Uses platform to push personal/political agendas (e.g., opposing Ukraine aid, promoting right-wing talking points) despite global consequences.
- **UN Food Program Controversy**: Dismissively challenged the UN to prove $6B could "solve world hunger," then refused to donate when they provided a plan.

### 5. **Ethical Lapses**
- **Market Manipulation**: SEC fined him for fraudulent tweets about taking Tesla private.
- **Spreading Misinformation**: Regularly promotes unverified claims (e.g., COVID, elections, George Soros conspiracies).
- **Antisemitism Accusations**: Endorsed an antisemitic post on Twitter/X, leading to major advertiser boycotts (2023).

### Why Some Defend Him:
Supporters argue he’s a disruptor who tolerates criticism poorly but drives progress (EVs, space exploration). They see his bluntness as authenticity and his demands as necessary for ambitious goals.

### The Nuance:
Labeling someone an "asshole" is reductive. Musk’s actions reflect complex priorities: relentless innovation vs. empathy, free speech advocacy vs. power consolidation. Whether his behavior is justified or merely self-serving depends on perspective.

**In short**: Critics view him as an asshole due to a pattern of cruelty, hypocrisy, and bullying — amplified by his platform. Others see a flawed visionary. What’s clear is that his impact extends far beyond technology, making his conduct a legitimate topic of public debate.
tops
见习写手
见习写手
帖子互动: 14
帖子: 103
注册时间: 2023年 12月 13日 01:01

#4 Re: 问了几个chat同样的问题

帖子 tops »

回复

回到 “美国新闻(USA News)”