https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/arti ... /2081/1482
虽说是垃圾杂志的垃圾文章，连基本的测量和确认都没有，但看着好像是真的．
疫苗致磁居然发文章了
版主： Softfist
#1 疫苗致磁居然发文章了
哪里有压迫，那里就有反抗。
80年前，美利坚人民向德日意极权资本开战；
再80年前，美利坚人民向南方奴隶资本开战；
再80年前，美利坚人民向英帝殖民资本开战；
以80年为周期的历史车轮到了美利坚人民向金融资本开战的时刻。
2025年7月8日，天王星进入双子座，带来革命的激励，轰轰烈烈的美国大革命必然爆发。
80年前，美利坚人民向德日意极权资本开战；
再80年前，美利坚人民向南方奴隶资本开战；
再80年前，美利坚人民向英帝殖民资本开战；
以80年为周期的历史车轮到了美利坚人民向金融资本开战的时刻。
2025年7月8日，天王星进入双子座，带来革命的激励，轰轰烈烈的美国大革命必然爆发。
-
我的叔叔于勒
- 著名点评
我的叔叔于勒 的博客 - 帖子互动： 104
- 帖子： 4344
- 注册时间： 2022年 9月 18日 01:23
#2 Re: 疫苗致磁居然发文章了
The study titled, Clinical Manifestations of Iatrogenic Magnetism in Subjects After Receiving COVID-19 Injectables: Case Report Series, was just published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science:
Abstract
A series of cases of COVID-19 vaccine-injected patients suffering from iatrogenic magnetism is described. The attachment of massive metallic objects (up to 70 grams) to different parts of the body is a real phenomenon that may present additional health risks if such patients are subjected to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The iatrogenic magnetism phenomenon typically appears several months after the injection. More likely, injected DNA plasmids, or modified mRNAs, translated into the spike protein, or into junk peptides formed through frameshifts, may engender proteins with ferromagnetic properties, or may entrap endogenous iron. Importantly, the spike protein has a distant homology to hepcidin, the key regulator of iron metabolism. Redistribution of iron into the brain or other body parts may be causing iatrogenic magnetism. Pfizer vaccine lots starting with the letter “F” may be involved, although we cannot exclude the possibility that Moderna or other manufacturers’ injections may also cause this phenomenon. In our observation, the magnetism may resolve spontaneously or when nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) is applied. Our pilot observation needs to be corroborated in a larger cohort study.
This study has confirmed observations reported by many individuals since 2021. Let’s break down what the researchers found:
1. Iatrogenic Magnetism Is Real and Clinically Observable
Patients in this series demonstrated the attachment of ferromagnetic objects (e.g., spoons, magnets) to the skin—particularly the forehead, temples, chest, and shoulders.
This effect was physically verified by researchers, often with photo documentation.
2. Symptoms Emerge Months After Vaccination
Onset occurred typically 1–20 months post-injection, suggesting the phenomenon is not caused by residual components in the injection site but possibly from genetic expression or systemic distribution.
3. Potential Mechanism Involving Iron and Spike Protein
Authors hypothesize that injected DNA plasmids or modified mRNA may produce abnormal peptides or spike proteins that:
Exhibit ferromagnetic properties, or
Cause endogenous iron entrapment and redistribution.
The spike protein shares distant homology with hepcidin, a key regulator of iron metabolism, potentially leading to iron accumulation in tissues such as the brain.
4. Vaccine Lot Correlation
Pfizer lots beginning with the letter “F” were overrepresented in the cases observed.
Moderna vaccines were also used in some patients, but correlation was less frequent.
5. Clinical Effects and Reversibility
Some patients also experienced neurological and cardiovascular symptoms (e.g., arrhythmias, tremors, cognitive decline).
In at least two cases, oral NAD⁺ supplementation (500 mg/day) appeared to resolve or reduce symptoms, including magnetism.
The Cases
Case 1:
A 53-year-old male with no prior magnetism developed magnetic adhesion of a 25g object to both temples about 15 months after receiving two Pfizer injections (lots EY3014 and FE3065). He experienced chest pain, arrhythmia, full-body tremors, cognitive impairment, and other systemic symptoms.
Case 2:
A previously healthy 39-year-old female developed magnetism in her forehead and right shoulder—at the injection site—around one month after receiving a single Pfizer dose (lot FL4574). A 42g metal object adhered to her forehead, causing pain; symptoms lessened with alcohol and intensified during grounding.
Case 3:
A 28-year-old female developed magnetism approximately 20 months after receiving two Pfizer injections (lots FE2296 and FH0161). A 45g metal object adhered to her forehead, temple, and chest, but the magnetism faded over time, possibly due to self-initiated NAD⁺ therapy (500 mg/day).
Case 4:
A 28-year-old male reported magnetism of a 42g metal object to his left temple and ribcage around 20 months post-injection with both Pfizer (lot FH9951) and Moderna (lot 3004494). Cognitive symptoms and visual disturbances during MRI resolved with NAD⁺, but relapsed after discontinuation.
Case 5:
A 32-year-old previously healthy male—spouse of Case 2—developed magnetism two months after receiving the Pfizer vaccine (lot FL4574). A 70g metal object adhered to his forehead, chest, and shoulder opposite the injection site, with no improvement from food or medication.
Case 6:
A 36-year-old female developed strong magnetism (~25g object adherence to her sternum) one month after receiving Pfizer and Moderna vaccines (lots 1F1012A and 3006274). Her unvaccinated 10-year-old son also developed similar chest-localized magnetism, raising the possibility of vaccine-related shedding.
Implications for Medical Safety
Magnetism could complicate MRI procedures, posing additional risks.
No mention of this phenomenon exists in Pfizer’s internal documents or VAERS, despite numerous anecdotal reports.
The authors call for independent quality control testing of Pfizer vaccine lots—especially those labeled with "F"—and a larger cohort study to replicate findings.
The authors concluded:
“The phenomenon of magnetism is real and not a nocebo effect.”
However, it’s important to also consider a study by Thorp et al titled, Unexpected magnetic attraction: Evidence for an organized energy field in the human body:
Introduction & Background: In recent months unexpected reports have surfaced claiming the presence of magnetic attraction in the shoulder regions of subjects who had recently received the COVID-19 vaccination. Purpose: To determine if such claims are legitimate or spurious.
Methods: A prospective observational study was performed utilizing standard neodymium magnets and non-magnetized paper clips in a rigorously standardized application protocol. Magnets and paper clips were applied over various regions of both deltoid muscles. The attraction score was calculated by adding one point for each pole of the magnet that attached to each arm over the deltoid muscle for a maximum score of 4. Likewise, three sizes of paper clips were tested with a maximum score of 6. The field score was calculated by adding the magnet score to the paper clip score for a maximum score of 10 points.
Results: 256 subjects were enrolled from June 1-July 7, 2021. Of these subjects, 148 (57.8%) declined the COVID-19 vaccination and 108 (42.2%) received it. Comparison of the two groups showed no significant differences with the magnet score, the clip score, or the total magnetic score (P > 0.1). Multiple regression models used all relevant dependent and independent variables and only autoimmune disease was associated with a reduced field score (p = 0.01).
Conclusions: A strong magnetic field is generated in the human body that has no causal relation to previous COVID-19 vaccination.
Further investigation is required to reach a definitive conclusion regarding COVID-19 mRNA injections and magnetism.
Abstract
A series of cases of COVID-19 vaccine-injected patients suffering from iatrogenic magnetism is described. The attachment of massive metallic objects (up to 70 grams) to different parts of the body is a real phenomenon that may present additional health risks if such patients are subjected to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The iatrogenic magnetism phenomenon typically appears several months after the injection. More likely, injected DNA plasmids, or modified mRNAs, translated into the spike protein, or into junk peptides formed through frameshifts, may engender proteins with ferromagnetic properties, or may entrap endogenous iron. Importantly, the spike protein has a distant homology to hepcidin, the key regulator of iron metabolism. Redistribution of iron into the brain or other body parts may be causing iatrogenic magnetism. Pfizer vaccine lots starting with the letter “F” may be involved, although we cannot exclude the possibility that Moderna or other manufacturers’ injections may also cause this phenomenon. In our observation, the magnetism may resolve spontaneously or when nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) is applied. Our pilot observation needs to be corroborated in a larger cohort study.
This study has confirmed observations reported by many individuals since 2021. Let’s break down what the researchers found:
1. Iatrogenic Magnetism Is Real and Clinically Observable
Patients in this series demonstrated the attachment of ferromagnetic objects (e.g., spoons, magnets) to the skin—particularly the forehead, temples, chest, and shoulders.
This effect was physically verified by researchers, often with photo documentation.
2. Symptoms Emerge Months After Vaccination
Onset occurred typically 1–20 months post-injection, suggesting the phenomenon is not caused by residual components in the injection site but possibly from genetic expression or systemic distribution.
3. Potential Mechanism Involving Iron and Spike Protein
Authors hypothesize that injected DNA plasmids or modified mRNA may produce abnormal peptides or spike proteins that:
Exhibit ferromagnetic properties, or
Cause endogenous iron entrapment and redistribution.
The spike protein shares distant homology with hepcidin, a key regulator of iron metabolism, potentially leading to iron accumulation in tissues such as the brain.
4. Vaccine Lot Correlation
Pfizer lots beginning with the letter “F” were overrepresented in the cases observed.
Moderna vaccines were also used in some patients, but correlation was less frequent.
5. Clinical Effects and Reversibility
Some patients also experienced neurological and cardiovascular symptoms (e.g., arrhythmias, tremors, cognitive decline).
In at least two cases, oral NAD⁺ supplementation (500 mg/day) appeared to resolve or reduce symptoms, including magnetism.
The Cases
Case 1:
A 53-year-old male with no prior magnetism developed magnetic adhesion of a 25g object to both temples about 15 months after receiving two Pfizer injections (lots EY3014 and FE3065). He experienced chest pain, arrhythmia, full-body tremors, cognitive impairment, and other systemic symptoms.
Case 2:
A previously healthy 39-year-old female developed magnetism in her forehead and right shoulder—at the injection site—around one month after receiving a single Pfizer dose (lot FL4574). A 42g metal object adhered to her forehead, causing pain; symptoms lessened with alcohol and intensified during grounding.
Case 3:
A 28-year-old female developed magnetism approximately 20 months after receiving two Pfizer injections (lots FE2296 and FH0161). A 45g metal object adhered to her forehead, temple, and chest, but the magnetism faded over time, possibly due to self-initiated NAD⁺ therapy (500 mg/day).
Case 4:
A 28-year-old male reported magnetism of a 42g metal object to his left temple and ribcage around 20 months post-injection with both Pfizer (lot FH9951) and Moderna (lot 3004494). Cognitive symptoms and visual disturbances during MRI resolved with NAD⁺, but relapsed after discontinuation.
Case 5:
A 32-year-old previously healthy male—spouse of Case 2—developed magnetism two months after receiving the Pfizer vaccine (lot FL4574). A 70g metal object adhered to his forehead, chest, and shoulder opposite the injection site, with no improvement from food or medication.
Case 6:
A 36-year-old female developed strong magnetism (~25g object adherence to her sternum) one month after receiving Pfizer and Moderna vaccines (lots 1F1012A and 3006274). Her unvaccinated 10-year-old son also developed similar chest-localized magnetism, raising the possibility of vaccine-related shedding.
Implications for Medical Safety
Magnetism could complicate MRI procedures, posing additional risks.
No mention of this phenomenon exists in Pfizer’s internal documents or VAERS, despite numerous anecdotal reports.
The authors call for independent quality control testing of Pfizer vaccine lots—especially those labeled with "F"—and a larger cohort study to replicate findings.
The authors concluded:
“The phenomenon of magnetism is real and not a nocebo effect.”
However, it’s important to also consider a study by Thorp et al titled, Unexpected magnetic attraction: Evidence for an organized energy field in the human body:
Introduction & Background: In recent months unexpected reports have surfaced claiming the presence of magnetic attraction in the shoulder regions of subjects who had recently received the COVID-19 vaccination. Purpose: To determine if such claims are legitimate or spurious.
Methods: A prospective observational study was performed utilizing standard neodymium magnets and non-magnetized paper clips in a rigorously standardized application protocol. Magnets and paper clips were applied over various regions of both deltoid muscles. The attraction score was calculated by adding one point for each pole of the magnet that attached to each arm over the deltoid muscle for a maximum score of 4. Likewise, three sizes of paper clips were tested with a maximum score of 6. The field score was calculated by adding the magnet score to the paper clip score for a maximum score of 10 points.
Results: 256 subjects were enrolled from June 1-July 7, 2021. Of these subjects, 148 (57.8%) declined the COVID-19 vaccination and 108 (42.2%) received it. Comparison of the two groups showed no significant differences with the magnet score, the clip score, or the total magnetic score (P > 0.1). Multiple regression models used all relevant dependent and independent variables and only autoimmune disease was associated with a reduced field score (p = 0.01).
Conclusions: A strong magnetic field is generated in the human body that has no causal relation to previous COVID-19 vaccination.
Further investigation is required to reach a definitive conclusion regarding COVID-19 mRNA injections and magnetism.
-
我的叔叔于勒
- 著名点评
我的叔叔于勒 的博客 - 帖子互动： 104
- 帖子： 4344
- 注册时间： 2022年 9月 18日 01:23
#3 Re: 疫苗致磁居然发文章了
本文描述了一系列接种新冠疫苗后出现医源性磁性的病例。将重达70克的金属物体附着在身体不同部位是一种真实存在的现象，如果这些患者接受核磁共振成像（MRI）检查，可能会带来额外的健康风险。医源性磁性现象通常在注射疫苗几个月后出现。更有可能的是，注射的DNA质粒或经过修饰的mRNA，翻译成刺突蛋白或通过移码形成的垃圾肽，可能会产生具有铁磁性的蛋白质，或可能捕获内源性铁。重要的是，刺突蛋白与铁调素（铁代谢的关键调节剂）具有远同源性。铁重新分布到大脑或其他身体部位可能导致医源性磁性。辉瑞疫苗中以字母“F”开头的批号可能与此有关，但我们不能排除Moderna或其他制造商的疫苗也可能导致这种现象。根据我们的观察，磁性可能会自发消退，或者在使用烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸 (NAD+) 时消退。我们的初步观察结果需要更大规模的队列研究来证实。
这项研究证实了自2021年以来许多人报告的观察结果。让我们来分析一下研究人员的发现：
1. 医源性磁性真实存在且临床可观察到
本系列患者表现出铁磁性物体（例如勺子、磁铁）附着在皮肤上——尤其是在额头、太阳穴、胸部和肩部。
研究人员通过物理验证了这种效应，通常还附有照片记录。
2. 症状在接种疫苗数月后出现
症状通常在注射后1-20个月出现，这表明这种现象并非由注射部位的残留成分引起，而可能是由基因表达或全身分布引起的。
3. 涉及铁和刺突蛋白的潜在机制
作者假设，注射的DNA质粒或修饰的mRNA可能产生异常的肽或刺突蛋白，这些肽或蛋白：
表现出铁磁性，或导致内源性铁的捕获和重新分布。
这项研究证实了自2021年以来许多人报告的观察结果。让我们来分析一下研究人员的发现：
1. 医源性磁性真实存在且临床可观察到
本系列患者表现出铁磁性物体（例如勺子、磁铁）附着在皮肤上——尤其是在额头、太阳穴、胸部和肩部。
研究人员通过物理验证了这种效应，通常还附有照片记录。
2. 症状在接种疫苗数月后出现
症状通常在注射后1-20个月出现，这表明这种现象并非由注射部位的残留成分引起，而可能是由基因表达或全身分布引起的。
3. 涉及铁和刺突蛋白的潜在机制
作者假设，注射的DNA质粒或修饰的mRNA可能产生异常的肽或刺突蛋白，这些肽或蛋白：
表现出铁磁性，或导致内源性铁的捕获和重新分布。
-
我的叔叔于勒
- 著名点评
我的叔叔于勒 的博客 - 帖子互动： 104
- 帖子： 4344
- 注册时间： 2022年 9月 18日 01:23
#4 Re: 疫苗致磁居然发文章了
病例1：
一名53岁男性，此前无磁性，在接受两剂辉瑞疫苗（批号EY3014和FE3065）约15个月后，出现一个25克物体磁性粘附于双侧太阳穴。他出现胸痛、心律失常、全身震颤、认知障碍和其他全身症状。
病例2：
一名先前健康的39岁女性，在接受一剂辉瑞疫苗（批号FL4574）约一个月后，其前额和右肩（注射部位）出现磁性。一个42克的金属物体粘附于她的前额，引起疼痛；饮酒后症状减轻，接地时症状加剧。
病例3：
一名28岁女性，在接受两剂辉瑞疫苗（批号FE2296和FH0161）约20个月后出现磁性。一个45克的金属物体粘附在她的额头、太阳穴和胸部，但磁性随着时间的推移逐渐减弱，这可能是由于她自行开始服用NAD⁺疗法（500毫克/天）所致。
病例4：
一名28岁的男性报告称，在注射辉瑞疫苗（批号FH9951）和Moderna疫苗（批号3004494）后约20个月，他的左侧太阳穴和胸腔被一个42克的金属物体磁性吸引。使用NAD⁺后，认知症状和MRI检查时的视觉障碍得到缓解，但停药后复发。
病例5：
一名32岁的既往健康男性（病例2的配偶）在接种辉瑞疫苗（批号FL4574）两个月后出现磁性。一个70克的金属物体粘附在他的额头、胸部和注射部位对侧的肩膀上，进食或服用药物后症状均未得到改善。
病例6：一名36岁的女性在接种辉瑞和Moderna疫苗（批号1F1012A和3006274）一个月后出现强磁感（约25克物体粘附于其胸骨）。她未接种疫苗的10岁儿子也出现了类似的胸部局部磁感，这提示存在疫苗相关脱落的可能性。
一名53岁男性，此前无磁性，在接受两剂辉瑞疫苗（批号EY3014和FE3065）约15个月后，出现一个25克物体磁性粘附于双侧太阳穴。他出现胸痛、心律失常、全身震颤、认知障碍和其他全身症状。
病例2：
一名先前健康的39岁女性，在接受一剂辉瑞疫苗（批号FL4574）约一个月后，其前额和右肩（注射部位）出现磁性。一个42克的金属物体粘附于她的前额，引起疼痛；饮酒后症状减轻，接地时症状加剧。
病例3：
一名28岁女性，在接受两剂辉瑞疫苗（批号FE2296和FH0161）约20个月后出现磁性。一个45克的金属物体粘附在她的额头、太阳穴和胸部，但磁性随着时间的推移逐渐减弱，这可能是由于她自行开始服用NAD⁺疗法（500毫克/天）所致。
病例4：
一名28岁的男性报告称，在注射辉瑞疫苗（批号FH9951）和Moderna疫苗（批号3004494）后约20个月，他的左侧太阳穴和胸腔被一个42克的金属物体磁性吸引。使用NAD⁺后，认知症状和MRI检查时的视觉障碍得到缓解，但停药后复发。
病例5：
一名32岁的既往健康男性（病例2的配偶）在接种辉瑞疫苗（批号FL4574）两个月后出现磁性。一个70克的金属物体粘附在他的额头、胸部和注射部位对侧的肩膀上，进食或服用药物后症状均未得到改善。
病例6：一名36岁的女性在接种辉瑞和Moderna疫苗（批号1F1012A和3006274）一个月后出现强磁感（约25克物体粘附于其胸骨）。她未接种疫苗的10岁儿子也出现了类似的胸部局部磁感，这提示存在疫苗相关脱落的可能性。
-
matlab
- 论坛精英
matlab 的博客 - 帖子互动： 533
- 帖子： 7285
- 注册时间： 2023年 3月 3日 14:35
#6 Re: 疫苗致磁居然发文章了
肯定假的。垃圾文章，污染科学。Atack 写了： 2025年 6月 12日 17:57 https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/arti ... /2081/1482
虽说是垃圾杂志的垃圾文章，连基本的测量和确认都没有，但看着好像是真的．
没有光子；也没有量子能级，量子跃迁，量子叠加，量子塌缩和量子纠缠。
