进出口数据造假是人尽皆知的事

[sdehc]

FED的专家分析过，结论是美国进口商为了逃关税，故意报低进口价格。症屁你们有没有被电到？

Did the U.S. Bilateral Goods Deficit With China Increase or Decrease During the US-China Trade Conflict?
Hunter L. Clark and Anna Wong

The United States' bilateral goods trade deficit with China appeared to have narrowed substantially since the escalation of the U.S.-China trade conflict in 2018, or so U.S. trade data suggest. By contrast, the Chinese data tell a much different story: the deficit, as implied by China's bilateral surplus, nearly reached historical highs by the end of 2020. Historically, the discrepancy between these trade balance figures had remained fairly predictable and stable. But with the onset of the trade conflict, U.S.-reported import values from China have fallen more sharply than the China-reported export values to the United States. Two reasons are likely responsible for this phenomenon: (1) U.S. importers underreporting Chinese imports in order to evade U.S. tariffs, and (2) Chinese exporters reporting higher exports due to changes in tax incentives in China. In this note, we find that the majority of the shift in discrepancy can be explained by the first factor, with an estimated $10 billion annual loss in U.S. tariff revenues due to underreported U.S. import

[bluebottle]

难道真的要上同位素。除了新疆棉，再禁点别的啥。只要含这个东西的就不让入关。。。

[UnixLinux]

FED的专家分析过，结论是美国进口商为了逃关税，故意报低进口价格。症屁你们有没有被电到？

Did the U.S. Bilateral Goods Deficit With China Increase or Decrease During the US-China Trade Conflict?
Hunter L. Clark and Anna Wong

The United States' bilateral goods trade deficit with China appeared to have narrowed substantially since the escalation of the U.S.-China trade conflict in 2018, or so U.S. trade data suggest. By contrast, the Chinese data tell a much different story: the deficit, as implied by China's bilateral surplus, nearly reached historical highs by the end of 2020. Historically, the discrepancy between these trade balance figures had remained fairly predictable and stable. But with the onset of the trade conflict, U.S.-reported import values from China have fallen more sharply than the China-reported export values to the United States. Two reasons are likely responsible for this phenomenon: (1) U.S. importers underreporting Chinese imports in order to evade U.S. tariffs, and (2) Chinese exporters reporting higher exports due to changes in tax incentives in China. In this note, we find that the majority of the shift in discrepancy can be explained by the first factor, with an estimated $10 billion annual loss in U.S. tariff revenues due to underreported U.S. import

https://newmitbbs.com/viewtopic.php?t=187258

[sdehc]

症屁总幻想我帝法治社会，规则完善，白大人个个守法爱国，同仇敌忾，跟我鳖不死不休。症屁小脑袋里一个怀疑白大人的念头都没有。
尼玛我帝资本家要是像症屁一样，能被文贵忽悠的买喜币，我帝早国将不国了。

[UnixLinux]

https://newmitbbs.com/viewtopic.php?t=187258

[UnixLinux]

难道真的要上同位素。除了新疆棉，再禁点别的啥。只要含这个东西的就不让入关。。。

你帝牛逼

[lgw]

FED的专家分析过，结论是美国进口商为了逃关税，故意报低进口价格。症屁你们有没有被电到？

Did the U.S. Bilateral Goods Deficit With China Increase or Decrease During the US-China Trade Conflict?
Hunter L. Clark and Anna Wong

The United States' bilateral goods trade deficit with China appeared to have narrowed substantially since the escalation of the U.S.-China trade conflict in 2018, or so U.S. trade data suggest. By contrast, the Chinese data tell a much different story: the deficit, as implied by China's bilateral surplus, nearly reached historical highs by the end of 2020. Historically, the discrepancy between these trade balance figures had remained fairly predictable and stable. But with the onset of the trade conflict, U.S.-reported import values from China have fallen more sharply than the China-reported export values to the United States. Two reasons are likely responsible for this phenomenon: (1) U.S. importers underreporting Chinese imports in order to evade U.S. tariffs, and (2) Chinese exporters reporting higher exports due to changes in tax incentives in China. In this note, we find that the majority of the shift in discrepancy can be explained by the first factor, with an estimated $10 billion annual loss in U.S. tariff revenues due to underreported U.S. import

这里面不也说了Chinese exporters reporting higher exports due to changes in tax incentives in China.

不过是老美比较天真，低估了我国人民的创造力。

现在是全世界的对华进口值都低于中国相应出口值。而且这个pattern就是20年后开始。

中国20年前出口数字一直正常，进口数字现在也一直正常。就是20年以来的出口数字对全世界都有问题。

呵呵，稍微有点智商的不是外宾就知道怎么回事。

突然装啥外宾啊。一个个的

[UnixLinux]

这里面不也说了Chinese exporters reporting higher exports due to changes in tax incentives in China.

不过是老美比较天真，低估了我国人民的创造力。

现在是全世界的对华进口值都低于中国相应出口值。而且这个pattern就是20年后开始。

中国20年前出口数字一直正常，进口数字现在也一直正常。就是20年以来的出口数字对全世界都有问题。

呵呵，稍微有点智商的不是外宾就知道怎么回事。

突然装啥外宾啊。一个个的

主要是你帝加关税，要想各种办法。

最后目的地是中东，中亚，非洲，南美洲，的话，就没问题。。。因为不涉及到你帝






！！

[UnixLinux]

主要是你帝加关税，要想各种办法。

最后目的地是中东，中亚，非洲，南美洲，的话，就没问题。。。因为不涉及到你帝






！！

[UnixLinux]

FED的专家分析过，结论是美国进口商为了逃关税，故意报低进口价格。症屁你们有没有被电到？

Did the U.S. Bilateral Goods Deficit With China Increase or Decrease During the US-China Trade Conflict?
Hunter L. Clark and Anna Wong

The United States' bilateral goods trade deficit with China appeared to have narrowed substantially since the escalation of the U.S.-China trade conflict in 2018, or so U.S. trade data suggest. By contrast, the Chinese data tell a much different story: the deficit, as implied by China's bilateral surplus, nearly reached historical highs by the end of 2020. Historically, the discrepancy between these trade balance figures had remained fairly predictable and stable. But with the onset of the trade conflict, U.S.-reported import values from China have fallen more sharply than the China-reported export values to the United States. Two reasons are likely responsible for this phenomenon: (1) U.S. importers underreporting Chinese imports in order to evade U.S. tariffs, and (2) Chinese exporters reporting higher exports due to changes in tax incentives in China. In this note, we find that the majority of the shift in discrepancy can be explained by the first factor, with an estimated $10 billion annual loss in U.S. tariff revenues due to underreported U.S. import

[Pta]

东盟也一样？

[itspid]

FED 也管到越南了吗？越南有关税吗？

2023年一季度越南对华出口119.3亿美元，我们统计的从越南进口为185.8亿美元，符合数据逻辑；
一季度我们对越南出口335.4亿美元，越南公布的从华进口，只有236.5亿美元，我们的出口数据比越南包括境外运费保险费的金额还高42%。

FED的文章应该注明时间，2020年写的，大锅灌水刚开始，贴这东东的和D一样，永远正确。

[mydada]

这里面不也说了Chinese exporters reporting higher exports due to changes in tax incentives in China.

不过是老美比较天真，低估了我国人民的创造力。

现在是全世界的对华进口值都低于中国相应出口值。而且这个pattern就是20年后开始。

中国20年前出口数字一直正常，进口数字现在也一直正常。就是20年以来的出口数字对全世界都有问题。

呵呵，稍微有点智商的不是外宾就知道怎么回事。

突然装啥外宾啊。一个个的

并不是全世界吧，只是香港，东南亚这些最后要转口到美国的地方

[mesofish]

这里面不也说了Chinese exporters reporting higher exports due to changes in tax incentives in China.

不过是老美比较天真，低估了我国人民的创造力。

现在是全世界的对华进口值都低于中国相应出口值。而且这个pattern就是20年后开始。

中国20年前出口数字一直正常，进口数字现在也一直正常。就是20年以来的出口数字对全世界都有问题。

呵呵，稍微有点智商的不是外宾就知道怎么回事。

突然装啥外宾啊。一个个的

In this note, we find that the majority of the shift in discrepancy can be explained by the first factor

你英文不太好吧