D
骗子窝。
D
版面规则
左也行，右也行，文明发帖就欢迎；粉也罢，黑也罢，互相尊重别谩骂。
左也行，右也行，文明发帖就欢迎；粉也罢，黑也罢，互相尊重别谩骂。
#2 Re: 驳川粉的中国威胁论
“中国民主了，还会是世界威胁”
这是一种什么样的你死我活的逻辑来把中国人民祭到军国主义的案板？
为了讨好主子，跟主子用一种声音说话，连正常的生存逻辑都不讲？
在民主世界，人和人之间的合作与竞争，国与国之间的合作与竞争一直存在。
这不是威胁，是正常人类社会。
中国人，其实是千百年来通过灭九族被基因选择了的群体，听话，懂事儿。
过去，关于中国人口有说法：中国人每天洗个热水澡，世界水资源就要枯竭，中国人跟老美一样的吃法，世界就得粮食危机。这是黄祸论。
而今，中国人民在黄鬼子、白鬼子夹击下，不生了，还要怎样？！
这些跪舔的、祭出新理论的川粉们真令人恶心！
这是一种什么样的你死我活的逻辑来把中国人民祭到军国主义的案板？
为了讨好主子，跟主子用一种声音说话，连正常的生存逻辑都不讲？
在民主世界，人和人之间的合作与竞争，国与国之间的合作与竞争一直存在。
这不是威胁，是正常人类社会。
中国人，其实是千百年来通过灭九族被基因选择了的群体，听话，懂事儿。
过去，关于中国人口有说法：中国人每天洗个热水澡，世界水资源就要枯竭，中国人跟老美一样的吃法，世界就得粮食危机。这是黄祸论。
而今，中国人民在黄鬼子、白鬼子夹击下，不生了，还要怎样？！
这些跪舔的、祭出新理论的川粉们真令人恶心！
本站群体构成：拉风向的监狱五毛、墙内政工团委骗子窝、早年留学前跟土共签了卖身契的留学老间谍、祝上海帮外宣留学老间谍们开办的本站早日被揭露和覆灭。
#7 Re: 驳川粉的中国威胁论
这种黄川粉是即蠢又坏
杨和柳 写了： 2023年 11月 6日 12:31 “中国民主了，还会是世界威胁”
这是一种什么样的你死我活的逻辑来把中国人民祭到军国主义的案板？
为了讨好主子，跟主子用一种声音说话，连正常的生存逻辑都不讲？
在民主世界，人和人之间的合作与竞争，国与国之间的合作与竞争一直存在。
这不是威胁，是正常人类社会。
中国人，其实是千百年来通过灭九族被基因选择了的群体，听话，懂事儿。
过去，关于中国人口有说法：中国人每天洗个热水澡，世界水资源就要枯竭，中国人跟老美一样的吃法，世界就得粮食危机。这是黄祸论。
而今，中国人民在黄鬼子、白鬼子夹击下，不生了，还要怎样？！
这些跪舔的、祭出新理论的川粉们真令人恶心！
#11 Re: 驳川粉的中国威胁论
这个不能冤枉川巨巨或者川粉，中国人争夺资源的说法来自奥巴马
杨和柳 写了： 2023年 11月 6日 12:31 “中国民主了，还会是世界威胁”
这是一种什么样的你死我活的逻辑来把中国人民祭到军国主义的案板？
为了讨好主子，跟主子用一种声音说话，连正常的生存逻辑都不讲？
在民主世界，人和人之间的合作与竞争，国与国之间的合作与竞争一直存在。
这不是威胁，是正常人类社会。
中国人，其实是千百年来通过灭九族被基因选择了的群体，听话，懂事儿。
过去，关于中国人口有说法：中国人每天洗个热水澡，世界水资源就要枯竭，中国人跟老美一样的吃法，世界就得粮食危机。这是黄祸论。
而今，中国人民在黄鬼子、白鬼子夹击下，不生了，还要怎样？！
这些跪舔的、祭出新理论的川粉们真令人恶心！
#14 Re: 驳川粉的中国威胁论
不知道你们都是选择性健忘，还是故意无视？中国威胁论早在trump之前就很普遍了，“kill all chinese”这么快就都忘记了？
美帝pivot转向亚太地区，就是奥巴开始的。奥巴交接给trump时，他自己说了，亚太地区，特别是朝鲜，将是美帝未来10年最头疼的地方。看来没有age well LOL
Interview - ABC News and Obama posted on 15 Apr 2010.
KERRY O'BRIEN: DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU ARE MAKING HEADWAY WITH PRESIDENT HU ON THIS FRONT?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well you know I think China has an enormous interest in solving this problem. You know if you talk to Chinese leaders I think they will acknowledge immediately that if over a billion Chinese citizens have the same living patterns as Australians and Americans do right now then all of us are in for a very miserable time, the planet just can't sustain it, so they understand that they've got to make a decision about a new model that is more sustainable that allows them to pursue the economic growth that they're pursuing while at the same time dealing with these environmental consequences. So I think they understand intellectually. Right now though they're understandable impulse is to say well let's let the developed countries, the Australias, and the Americas deal with this problem first and we'll get to it when we've caught up a little bit in terms of our standard of living. The point we've tried to make is we can't, we can't allow China to wait. We have to take responsibility and do what needs to be done, but if emerging countries not just China but also India, Brazil and others are pursuing a path in which they replace us as the largest carbon emitters, that's not a sustainable practical approach, so we're going to have to have everybody moving on the same track at the same time.
“If over a billion Chinese citizens have the same living patterns as Australians and Americans do right now then all of us are in for a very miserable time, the planet just can't sustain it”.
美帝pivot转向亚太地区，就是奥巴开始的。奥巴交接给trump时，他自己说了，亚太地区，特别是朝鲜，将是美帝未来10年最头疼的地方。看来没有age well LOL
Interview - ABC News and Obama posted on 15 Apr 2010.
KERRY O'BRIEN: DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU ARE MAKING HEADWAY WITH PRESIDENT HU ON THIS FRONT?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well you know I think China has an enormous interest in solving this problem. You know if you talk to Chinese leaders I think they will acknowledge immediately that if over a billion Chinese citizens have the same living patterns as Australians and Americans do right now then all of us are in for a very miserable time, the planet just can't sustain it, so they understand that they've got to make a decision about a new model that is more sustainable that allows them to pursue the economic growth that they're pursuing while at the same time dealing with these environmental consequences. So I think they understand intellectually. Right now though they're understandable impulse is to say well let's let the developed countries, the Australias, and the Americas deal with this problem first and we'll get to it when we've caught up a little bit in terms of our standard of living. The point we've tried to make is we can't, we can't allow China to wait. We have to take responsibility and do what needs to be done, but if emerging countries not just China but also India, Brazil and others are pursuing a path in which they replace us as the largest carbon emitters, that's not a sustainable practical approach, so we're going to have to have everybody moving on the same track at the same time.
“If over a billion Chinese citizens have the same living patterns as Australians and Americans do right now then all of us are in for a very miserable time, the planet just can't sustain it”.
#19 Re: 驳川粉的中国威胁论
so we're going to have to have everybody moving on the same track at the same time.
您怎么理解这两句话？
本站群体构成：拉风向的监狱五毛、墙内政工团委骗子窝、早年留学前跟土共签了卖身契的留学老间谍、祝上海帮外宣留学老间谍们开办的本站早日被揭露和覆灭。