智者千慮？為什麼沒人利用Logan Act

[我親自]

Prof. Julian Ku Discusses Potential Logan Act Violations by Former President Trump

Hofstra Law Professor Julian Ku was quoted in the Axios article “Logan Act: Why it could be illegal for Trump to call Putin.”

https://lawnews.hofstra.edu/2024/10/10/ ... ent-trump/

[我親自]

為什麼沒有人敢拿起法律武器起訴之？
難道是左派不懂法？

[fieldman]

就算用，也是打到最高法院，你猜高院会怎么判？

為什麼沒有人敢拿起法律武器起訴之？
難道是左派不懂法？

[springc]

Logan act is for civilians.

Prof. Julian Ku Discusses Potential Logan Act Violations by Former President Trump

Hofstra Law Professor Julian Ku was quoted in the Axios article “Logan Act: Why it could be illegal for Trump to call Putin.”

https://lawnews.hofstra.edu/2024/10/10/ ... ent-trump/

[我親自]

就算用，也是打到最高法院，你猜高院会怎么判？

如此重要案子，當然希望升到最高法院，充分展示其違法行為。

[我親自]

Logan act is for civilians.

bingo 所以要用此法案揭露其隱藏的眞實面目嘴臉身分

[我親自]

Logan act is for civilians.

According to Black's Law Dictionary, a civilian is a private citizen who is not a member of the military, navy, or church. A civilian can also be someone who is knowledgeable in civil law, such as a doctor, professor, or student of civil law.

[fieldman]

如果高院的判决基本上板上钉钉，那么何必脱了裤子放屁？

如此重要案子，當然希望升到最高法院，充分展示其違法行為。

[sobering]

Cut the shit out

[我親自]

如果高院的判决基本上板上钉钉，那么何必脱了裤子放屁？

彈劾都不止一次了，而且都是捕風捉影，更不用說脫褲子放屁了。
而logan act可是鐵證如山，板上釘釘。

[我親自]

Cut the shit out

問題就是驢黨怎麼不敢舉起logan act去cut

[drifter]

彈劾都不止一次了，而且都是捕風捉影，更不用說脫褲子放屁了。
而logan act可是鐵證如山，板上釘釘。

上次大家知道Logan act不就是上次川普上任时媒体闹腾么
这么快就忘了？

[fieldman]

你明显是不懂，楼跟法是历史上出名的废法，因为它和第一修正案相左。

問題就是驢黨怎麼不敢舉起logan act去cut

[我親自]

看來現在是各國法盲複習美國基本法的好時機。
漏根規則是限制政府官員行事以保障國家安全，而第一修正案是保證公民權利不被剝奪。

驢黨動用漏根成功廢掉福臨將軍，而後靠總統特赦免於囹圄。但是可是可但是，動不了djt，只能提示到這兒了。