一个今年的例子
版主: noles
#1 一个今年的例子
今天知道一个社区里的小孩从州里的二三流州立大学(这个二三流是指在州里所有公立大学里面的二三档, 不是全国二三档)毕业, 要去苹果公司工作了。男孩, 白人, 计算机专业。
恰好与这个小孩有过几次交往。 小孩确实不错, 专研东西深,好琢磨,说话也快, 不知道当初是怎么流落到二三流州立大学的。
美帝这个社会对白男真是机会多多。 即使暂时失落, 还是有很多机会翻盘的。 华人小孩很难有这种机会, 就只能拼大学排名;华人父母也真不容易。
恰好与这个小孩有过几次交往。 小孩确实不错, 专研东西深,好琢磨,说话也快, 不知道当初是怎么流落到二三流州立大学的。
美帝这个社会对白男真是机会多多。 即使暂时失落, 还是有很多机会翻盘的。 华人小孩很难有这种机会, 就只能拼大学排名;华人父母也真不容易。
+2.00 积分 [版主 noles 发放的奖励]
标签/Tags:
-
- 论坛元老
cellcycle1 的博客 - 帖子互动: 836
- 帖子: 62439
- 注册时间: 2022年 7月 24日 15:59
#3 Re: 一个今年的例子
现在要进顶尖学校光成绩好还不够,还要拼EC、essay,要 well rounded。我也见过几个很聪明的孩子,男生居多,数学物理这些课程一点就透,其他课懒得下功夫,也不卷竞赛、leadership这些,最后基本上都去了Michigan State、NC State这一档的学校。
#4 Re: 一个今年的例子
也可能是那个州立给他full ride. 他家里不管他任何费用,上不起好的学校。只能去这个大学。但人聪明,所以结果也是好的。AnonymityFreedom 写了: 2025年 5月 9日 15:15 今天知道一个社区里的小孩从州里的二三流州立大学(这个二三流是指在州里所有公立大学里面的二三档, 不是全国二三档)毕业, 要去苹果公司工作了。男孩, 白人, 计算机专业。
恰好与这个小孩有过几次交往。 小孩确实不错, 专研东西深,好琢磨,说话也快, 不知道当初是怎么流落到二三流州立大学的。
美帝这个社会对白男真是机会多多。 即使暂时失落, 还是有很多机会翻盘的。 华人小孩很难有这种机会, 就只能拼大学排名;华人父母也真不容易。
#5 Re: 一个今年的例子
去apple community college都能办到,这有什么好惊讶的?
AnonymityFreedom 写了: 2025年 5月 9日 15:15 今天知道一个社区里的小孩从州里的二三流州立大学(这个二三流是指在州里所有公立大学里面的二三档, 不是全国二三档)毕业, 要去苹果公司工作了。男孩, 白人, 计算机专业。
恰好与这个小孩有过几次交往。 小孩确实不错, 专研东西深,好琢磨,说话也快, 不知道当初是怎么流落到二三流州立大学的。
美帝这个社会对白男真是机会多多。 即使暂时失落, 还是有很多机会翻盘的。 华人小孩很难有这种机会, 就只能拼大学排名;华人父母也真不容易。
+2.00 积分 [版主 noles 发放的奖励]
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#7 Re: 一个今年的例子
他沦落到2,3流,说明现在申请大学的卷法其实是埋没人才AnonymityFreedom 写了: 2025年 5月 9日 15:15 今天知道一个社区里的小孩从州里的二三流州立大学(这个二三流是指在州里所有公立大学里面的二三档, 不是全国二三档)毕业, 要去苹果公司工作了。男孩, 白人, 计算机专业。
恰好与这个小孩有过几次交往。 小孩确实不错, 专研东西深,好琢磨,说话也快, 不知道当初是怎么流落到二三流州立大学的。
美帝这个社会对白男真是机会多多。 即使暂时失落, 还是有很多机会翻盘的。 华人小孩很难有这种机会, 就只能拼大学排名;华人父母也真不容易。
+2.00 积分 [版主 noles 发放的奖励]
#9 Re: 一个今年的例子
你才知道
所以不能怪华女嫁白男。
别人基因好,社会给的机会多
所以不能怪华女嫁白男。
别人基因好,社会给的机会多
AnonymityFreedom 写了: 2025年 5月 9日 15:15 今天知道一个社区里的小孩从州里的二三流州立大学(这个二三流是指在州里所有公立大学里面的二三档, 不是全国二三档)毕业, 要去苹果公司工作了。男孩, 白人, 计算机专业。
恰好与这个小孩有过几次交往。 小孩确实不错, 专研东西深,好琢磨,说话也快, 不知道当初是怎么流落到二三流州立大学的。
美帝这个社会对白男真是机会多多。 即使暂时失落, 还是有很多机会翻盘的。 华人小孩很难有这种机会, 就只能拼大学排名;华人父母也真不容易。
+2.00 积分 [版主 noles 发放的奖励]
#10 Re: 一个今年的例子
一个混血孩子,各种成绩都一般般(按华人标准),今年大学一水儿藤校Offer。。。 就因为人家有个白人Last Name;同一高中的另外一个华人孩子,学习/体育/音乐/课外门门拔尖,被藤校锯到流眼泪。。。
+2.00 积分 [版主 noles 发放的奖励]
跳出三界外,不在五行中
#11 Re: 一个今年的例子
所以华人孩子要努力摆脱“高分低能”的帽子,别只刷分,要社交,有leadership,别搞到以后别人一看华人姓,就直接认定你成绩50%是水分。
macarthur 写了: 2025年 5月 14日 17:38 一个混血孩子,各种成绩都一般般(按华人标准),今年大学一水儿藤校Offer。。。 就因为人家有个白人Last Name;同一高中的另外一个华人孩子,学习/体育/音乐/课外门门拔尖,被藤校锯到流眼泪。。。
+2.00 积分 [版主 noles 发放的奖励]
x1

#12 Re: 一个今年的例子
这个前AO 说的很好:goodegg 写了: 2025年 5月 15日 04:53 所以华人孩子要努力摆脱“高分低能”的帽子,别只刷分,要社交,有leadership,别搞到以后别人一看华人姓,就直接认定你成绩50%是水分。
are these posts actually real??
3.8+|1500+/34+|STEM
i like spent a whole 30 mins scrolling through posts on here and boi its stressing me out so bad rn cus everyone here has crazy ecs and awards and they still get rejected. also ignore the flair
Former admissions officer here from a top college, short answer: absolutely.
Here’s why:
I’ve seen plenty of high-achieving students get rejected, even with near-perfect GPAs and test scores. The biggest reasons? They didn’t show a genuine interest in our school, skipped optional supplements (which aren’t really optional unless your main app shows a strong alignment with the school’s mission), or came off as immature or unaware in their essays. Some shared stories that raised more concerns than confidence.
Having amazing stats isn’t a free pass to any university. Every school has a unique culture, and you still need to explain why you belong there specifically. Too often, students assume strong stats are enough, but admissions is just as much as about connecting with the adcom as it is about stats. You essays, recs, and activities need to bring out your personality, character, and alignment with the school.
I’ve read common app essays from students that went on and on about their inspiration and passion for engineering, for a school that did not offer an engineering major/track. Making us wonder, why you were even applying to our school. You have to make every school you apply to feel like they’re you’re #1 choice, because universities also care about their conversion rate of students that they admit, who actually commit, they do not want to offer a seat to students that are not enthusiastic about their school because every seat the school offers, may be the equivalent of rejecting 5 other highly qualified students who would say YES!
Think of it like dating. A 4.0 and a 1500+ SAT is similar to being tall, attractive, and fit. Great for many — but lots of other people check those boxes too. And to stand out, especially to a person who is also attractive and has many options (a highly selective university in our case) you need personality and depth that resonates with the person (school). And even then, you still might get rejected because you simply weren’t what they were looking for at that time, it’s not always personal.
I feel like many students and parents fail to understand the purpose of academic stats. We use these numbers as a way to gauge whether or not you can handle the workload and rigors of our classroom. The more rigorous and prestigious the school, the higher that bar is. But once you’re over it, it’s all about character, values, and alignment.
And here’s the twist: top schools do take chances on students with less-than-average stats, IF their story is powerful, inspiring, and shows grit. Because these schools have the academic resources to support them. Every year we see students who applied with perfect SAT scores and 4.0 GPAs with <2.5 First semester GPAs. As schools we accept the fact that students will struggle in our classroom regardless of their stats, and we address this by offering an abundance of academic resources to ensure students don’t flunk out, because that’s actually a poor reflection on us. So we can lean on the fact that students who may have not had the best HS academic performance can still do well in our classrooms if they utilize the resources our campus offers.
What sometimes matters more than stats is that the student has something meaningful to contribute and the potential to thrive with the right support.
x1

上次由 noles 在 2025年 5月 15日 11:50 修改。
原因: 未提供修改原因
原因: 未提供修改原因