妥协合作一直在进行,同时还嘴硬。对外投降,对内欺骗。waterflow 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 14:58 打得过就灭了对方,打不过就妥协、合作、作朋友。白人世界就一直这样,也没觉得丢人。中国当然也该这样,中国现在显然不可能独自对抗西方数十个国家,妥协合作是正确策略。
英雄不敢当,奴才也做不好,这是叔一直反对的。
如果妥协,就应该大肆宣传,claim credit, 不要给反华势力留借口。
版主: Softfist
妥协合作一直在进行,同时还嘴硬。对外投降,对内欺骗。waterflow 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 14:58 打得过就灭了对方,打不过就妥协、合作、作朋友。白人世界就一直这样,也没觉得丢人。中国当然也该这样,中国现在显然不可能独自对抗西方数十个国家,妥协合作是正确策略。
letsrock 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 10:39 所以这个时候突然相信fake news 了?
引用西方得便宜卖乖的导向性新闻,是鳖共惯用的洗脑方式,你又殊途同归了。
米帝的媒体都是为配合其政策而释放加工过的信息。
抱着这种臭脚不放,说明两点
1,幻想未灭
2,智商堪忧
你不能拿白皮打掩护。helpme 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 10:34 来,叔给你看看CNN的解读,看看他们智商不正常还是你不正常?
China’s new Foreign Minister Qin Gang warned Tuesday that “conflict and confrontation” with the United States is inevitable if Washington does not change course, delivering a stern and wide-ranging rebuke of US policies for his first press conference in the new role.
Qin, who was until recently China’s ambassador to the US, built up a reputation for being careful and accomplished diplomat while overseas.
But he struck a far more combative tone in his first appearance as foreign minister at China’s annual parliamentary meeting, warning of the “catastrophic consequences” of what he described as a “reckless gamble” by Washington in how it treats its fellow superpower.
“If the United States does not hit the brakes, but continues to speed down the wrong path, no amount of guardrails can prevent derailing, and there will surely be conflict and confrontation,” Qin said on the sidelines of the National People’s Congress in Beijing.
At the highly scripted event, Qin set the tone for China’s foreign policy for the coming year and beyond, berating the US for rising bilateral tensions and defending Beijing’s close partnership with Moscow.
Ties between the world’s two largest economies are at their worst in decades, and tensions soared further last month after a suspected Chinese spy balloon floated over North America and was then shot down by US fighter jets.
On Tuesday, Qin accused the US of overreacting in its response, which he said created “a diplomatic crisis that could have been avoided.”
The incident, Qin said, shows “the US perception and views of China are seriously distorted. It regards China as its primary rival and the biggest geopolitical challenge.”
“The US claims it seeks to compete with China but does not seek conflict. But in reality, the so-called ‘competition’ by the US is all-round containment and suppression, a zero-sum game of life and death,” he said.
“Containment and suppression will not make America great, and the US will not stop the rejuvenation of China,” Qin said.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/07/china/ch ... index.html
Where did you find that information? Or you just made it up out of thin air?nancy02 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 16:04 letsrock think only CCTV or Russian state TV are not fake news and everywhere else are fake news. LOL. Is letsrock working for CCTV or Putin?
现在讨论的是秦刚在新闻发布会到底表达了啥意思,是要跪,还是要开干,和白皮有啥期待完全无关
不说那么极端。至少他是温和派亲美派。这是美国熊猫派的看法。但是没用。熊猫派要复苏,需要我鳖强硬对抗鹰派,让鹰派无法取得任何credit,熊猫派才能说上话。
投资高回报机构债赚利息,在你看来比买国债救美帝要重要。鳖实打实做了,奈何你不承认啊letsrock 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 16:14 叔对你的建议也一样。
叔的point是,鳖与米帝翻脸与否,过去无数的历史证明,不能看鳖说了什么,而是要看鳖做了什么
viewtopic.php?t=128388
这些都是你的猜测,没有任何事实依据。至少秦刚在发布会上说的话,没有任何要跪美的意思wanmeishijie 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 16:33 不说那么极端。至少他是温和派亲美派。这是美国熊猫派的看法。但是没用。熊猫派要复苏,需要我鳖强硬对抗鹰派,让鹰派无法取得任何credit,熊猫派才能说上话。
然而现在鹰派每一步都能给美国带来重大面子和里子,熊猫派能说上话吗?
爷不在乎,爷只在乎他到底表达了什么。强加于人不是好习惯。letsrock 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 16:14 叔对你的建议也一样。
叔的point是,鳖与米帝翻脸与否,过去无数的历史证明,不能看鳖说了什么,而是要看鳖做了什么
viewtopic.php?t=128388
你不说,我不说,升斗小民也当不成了,得当亡国奴或者奴下奴。helpme 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 16:38 这些都是你的猜测,没有任何事实依据。至少秦刚在发布会上说的话,没有任何要跪美的意思
至于包叔将来敢不敢和美国掀桌子,吾等升斗小民多说无益,只能等着看
你们这些屁股决定脑袋,装睡的“人”,真特么可笑。叔都贴了好几次CNN和foxnews的报道了,说秦刚threaten照此下去中美会有灾难性的冲突。中文媒体的报道是“秦刚谈中美关系:美方要中国打不还手骂不还口,这办不到”,还不够清楚吗?wanmeishijie 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 17:21 你不说,我不说,升斗小民也当不成了,得当亡国奴或者奴下奴。
秦刚的语气是跪,内容也是跪。不提天津清单,不提核心利益,不提红线。唯求“防止对撞”,其实就是求美国不要加码,放过自己而已。
你见过他说什么威胁的话了?威胁军援俄罗斯了还是威胁第七舰队了?
你所谓的“灾难性冲突”,是中国威慑反击美国造成美国灾难,还是中国担心美国进攻造成中国的灾难?白宫有羽毛春之流,一下就可以看出秦刚的软弱helpme 写了: 2023年 3月 9日 17:28 你们这些屁股决定脑袋,装睡的“人”,真特么可笑。叔都贴了好几次CNN和foxnews的报道了,说秦刚threaten照此下去中美会有灾难性的冲突。中文媒体的报道是“秦刚谈中美关系:美方要中国打不还手骂不还口,这办不到”,还不够清楚吗?
你们还要问这种BS question多少次??