"There’s No Need to Guess. JD Vance Is Ready to Ignore the Courts.
I interviewed the vice president last year, and he didn’t mince words about wanting to provoke a constitutional crisis against the Supreme Court."
他们现在好像还听是因为高院基本是向着他们的。
（转载）今天最高法院6：3的判决，“会导致”非法移民和F1, J1, B1,H1B在美国出生子女没有公民权
版主： Softfist
#41 Re: （转载）今天最高法院6：3的判决，非法移民和F1, J1, B1,H1B在美国出生子女没有公民权
所以说你是静态的看问题呢。真等到自由派掌握了高院，MAGA就会不听court order了。高院有几个师？
"There’s No Need to Guess. JD Vance Is Ready to Ignore the Courts.
I interviewed the vice president last year, and he didn’t mince words about wanting to provoke a constitutional crisis against the Supreme Court."
他们现在好像还听是因为高院基本是向着他们的。
"There’s No Need to Guess. JD Vance Is Ready to Ignore the Courts.
I interviewed the vice president last year, and he didn’t mince words about wanting to provoke a constitutional crisis against the Supreme Court."
他们现在好像还听是因为高院基本是向着他们的。
#42 美国最高法院将在10月份对出生公民权作出宪法解释
美国宪法第十四修正案明文规定："All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
而且，美国最高法院从1898年United States v. Wong Kim Ark的案件判例开始，就一直承认the jus soli principle的。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St ... ng_Kim_Ark
The Supreme Court's majority concluded that the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" referred to being required to obey U.S. law; on this basis, they interpreted the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to grant citizenship to children born in the United States, with only a limited set of exceptions based on English common law. The Court held that being born to alien parents was not one of those exceptions.
现在，美国有22个州起诉特朗普政府的限制出生公民权的行政命令（executive order）违反宪法。但是，在其它28个没有起诉的州里，该行政命令可能从7月27日起生效。
如果美国最高法院在今年10月份对出生公民权作出宪法解释，那将给出最终的答案。如果美国最高法院裁决特朗普的行政命令违反宪法，那美国全境的出生公民权将得到保障。
https://www.financialexpress.com/world- ... t/3895579/
"Birthright citizenship will be decided in October, in the next session by the Supreme Court," Attorney General Pam Bondi said at a White House briefing on June 27, 2025.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj9velv7z4no
Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday (June 27, 2025) that the Supreme Court will decide whether the U.S. will end birthright citizenship in October during its next session.
而且，美国最高法院从1898年United States v. Wong Kim Ark的案件判例开始，就一直承认the jus soli principle的。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St ... ng_Kim_Ark
The Supreme Court's majority concluded that the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" referred to being required to obey U.S. law; on this basis, they interpreted the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to grant citizenship to children born in the United States, with only a limited set of exceptions based on English common law. The Court held that being born to alien parents was not one of those exceptions.
现在，美国有22个州起诉特朗普政府的限制出生公民权的行政命令（executive order）违反宪法。但是，在其它28个没有起诉的州里，该行政命令可能从7月27日起生效。
如果美国最高法院在今年10月份对出生公民权作出宪法解释，那将给出最终的答案。如果美国最高法院裁决特朗普的行政命令违反宪法，那美国全境的出生公民权将得到保障。
https://www.financialexpress.com/world- ... t/3895579/
"Birthright citizenship will be decided in October, in the next session by the Supreme Court," Attorney General Pam Bondi said at a White House briefing on June 27, 2025.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj9velv7z4no
Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday (June 27, 2025) that the Supreme Court will decide whether the U.S. will end birthright citizenship in October during its next session.
上次由 truth 在 2025年 7月 4日 16:31 修改。
#43 Re: （转载）今天最高法院6：3的判决，“会导致”非法移民和F1, J1, B1,H1B在美国出生子女没有公民权
30天 7.27. 美弟28个红州的就生效了哦 只能自己去告 class action
知道很多人的居住环境以后 我终于明白为啥会有这些想法了
#44 Re: （转载）今天最高法院6：3的判决，非法移民和F1, J1, B1,H1B在美国出生子女没有公民权
打倒公检法fieldman 写了： 2025年 6月 28日 11:45 所以说你是静态的看问题呢。真等到自由派掌握了高院，MAGA就会不听court order了。高院有几个师？
"There’s No Need to Guess. JD Vance Is Ready to Ignore the Courts.
I interviewed the vice president last year, and he didn’t mince words about wanting to provoke a constitutional crisis against the Supreme Court."
他们现在好像还听是因为高院基本是向着他们的。
知道很多人的居住环境以后 我终于明白为啥会有这些想法了
#45 Re: （转载）今天最高法院6：3的判决，“会导致”非法移民和F1, J1, B1,H1B在美国出生子女没有公民权
老婆快生了，跑到兰州接生可以吗？
Make America Great Again
#48 美国最高法院将在10月份对出生公民权作出宪法解释
现在已经有原告将案件改为集体诉讼了（class-action lawsuit）。如果法官同意，法院仍然可以在美国全国范围阻止特朗普的行政命令。有意思的是，特朗普政府似乎也接受集体诉讼的法律途径，而只反对nationwide injunction。不过，最终的结果还是取决于美国最高法院将在10月份对美国宪法第十四修正案作出的解释。
https://www.kuow.org/stories/what-the-b ... gton-state
For the 28 states that did not sue Trump's administration over the ban, this could mean Trump's birthright citizenship ban goes into effect on July 27.
The Supreme Court left open an alternative pathway for those seeking to block Trump's ban (and other policies) nationwide: a class-action lawsuit. Within hours of the Supreme Court's ruling, advocacy groups reconfigured their lawsuit, seeking class-action status to represent all pregnant people and children born to families without legal status across the United States.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/30/poli ... n-lawsuits
Attorneys representing the plaintiffs in the New Hampshire and Maryland cases raced back to court to bring class action lawsuits, asking judges to certify a class of individuals who could be impacted by Trump's order.
Such class-action litigation could potentially lead to the same outcome as nationwide injunctions.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/15/poli ... tive-order
Amy Barrett pressed John Sauer on why the administration is opposed to a nationwide injunction but generally willing to accept a class-action judgment that would likely have the same effect.
Sauer responded with two points: First, securing a class action can be more difficult. Second, a class-action judgement would require challengers to put more skin in the fight. In other words, if the members of class action lost, they would collectively also be bound by the decision. "So they're taking a grave risk," he said.
https://www.kuow.org/stories/what-the-b ... gton-state
For the 28 states that did not sue Trump's administration over the ban, this could mean Trump's birthright citizenship ban goes into effect on July 27.
The Supreme Court left open an alternative pathway for those seeking to block Trump's ban (and other policies) nationwide: a class-action lawsuit. Within hours of the Supreme Court's ruling, advocacy groups reconfigured their lawsuit, seeking class-action status to represent all pregnant people and children born to families without legal status across the United States.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/30/poli ... n-lawsuits
Attorneys representing the plaintiffs in the New Hampshire and Maryland cases raced back to court to bring class action lawsuits, asking judges to certify a class of individuals who could be impacted by Trump's order.
Such class-action litigation could potentially lead to the same outcome as nationwide injunctions.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/15/poli ... tive-order
Amy Barrett pressed John Sauer on why the administration is opposed to a nationwide injunction but generally willing to accept a class-action judgment that would likely have the same effect.
Sauer responded with two points: First, securing a class action can be more difficult. Second, a class-action judgement would require challengers to put more skin in the fight. In other words, if the members of class action lost, they would collectively also be bound by the decision. "So they're taking a grave risk," he said.
上次由 truth 在 2025年 7月 4日 17:36 修改。
-
Caravel
- 论坛元老
Caravel 的博客 - 帖子互动： 545
- 帖子： 24287
- 注册时间： 2022年 7月 24日 17:21
