别装高明了
钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
版主: Softfist
#24 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
那个白皮猪明显从一开始就对身后这群老中有敌意,那几个老中在现场马上就感受到了,但可惜没有抓住机会羞辱这个白皮猪反而把自己给陷进去了。也是真蠢
#27 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
加州法律的具体情况被发在了meiyoumajia 写了: 2024年 1月 24日 20:08 其实很合情理
有相当高比例的人在某些场合会不愿意自己被拍摄后发到网上
也许可参考的是
https://www.mwl-law.com/wp-content/uplo ... -CHART.pdf
viewtopic.php?t=391788
法律的基础还是合理性,会被更完备/继续补充。
(另外我想到这种特殊事情:若有某男/某女不慎在公共场合(几乎)暴露了私处或有那种可能后,若被各位看官不幸遇到,别拍!。。。;-)
#28 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
英国
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/21081632/ ... %20grounds.
However, if the recording was taken in a public place, there is no legal standpoint to protect you.
It all boils down to the individual capturing the content and if you have particular issue with featuring in the footage, you may ask them to blur you out.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/21081632/ ... %20grounds.
However, if the recording was taken in a public place, there is no legal standpoint to protect you.
It all boils down to the individual capturing the content and if you have particular issue with featuring in the footage, you may ask them to blur you out.
#29 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
https://recordinglaw.com/can-i-sue-some ... -property/
Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?
January 13, 2022 by Adam
Under state and federal law, it is legal to film anyone who does not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” In public spaces, you do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?
January 13, 2022 by Adam
Under state and federal law, it is legal to film anyone who does not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” In public spaces, you do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
#31 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
你们这些五毛就不能回去看看原视频再扯淡?
老头有个日本电视台的朋友在和他一起弹琴, 然后这些人过来, 他以为是那个朋友的日本团队。 后来澄清了,他就没说啥,还要请中国人一起弹琴,跳舞,整个和谐的很。 然后老头对镜头介绍,今天有中国人,还有日本电视台的朋友。 中国团队八成就听懂了Japanese一个单词,就有意无意的赖上人家老头说他们日本人。 在英国呆那么多年,也听不懂英国人说话。
弹琴这个事, 你以为是人都会弹这个冷门曲子? 以前的视频看, 还是个华人教这个老头弹的。 你觉得这个老头会认为中国人教他弹的中国曲子是歧视华人的?
一开始的双方和谐互动,足以说明这个老头至少面上没有任何歧视的举动。
老头有个日本电视台的朋友在和他一起弹琴, 然后这些人过来, 他以为是那个朋友的日本团队。 后来澄清了,他就没说啥,还要请中国人一起弹琴,跳舞,整个和谐的很。 然后老头对镜头介绍,今天有中国人,还有日本电视台的朋友。 中国团队八成就听懂了Japanese一个单词,就有意无意的赖上人家老头说他们日本人。 在英国呆那么多年,也听不懂英国人说话。
弹琴这个事, 你以为是人都会弹这个冷门曲子? 以前的视频看, 还是个华人教这个老头弹的。 你觉得这个老头会认为中国人教他弹的中国曲子是歧视华人的?
一开始的双方和谐互动,足以说明这个老头至少面上没有任何歧视的举动。
x1

#33 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
meiyoumajia 写了: 2024年 1月 24日 19:34 在英国和美国大部分州,在公共场合被拍摄的人在表明自己不愿意被录后,被录的视频如果不被删除就可能会是非法的
美国
https://recordinglaw.com/can-i-sue-some ... -property/
It is unlawful to film anyone who has a reasonable expectation of privacy without consent in 34 states.
英国
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/21081632/ ... %20grounds.
This rule also applies to crowded places.
According to the internet law centre, filming an individual where they are expecting their experience to remain private, could be unlawful.
This also includes large events.
The law centre said: "The privacy element may be confined to the company of a selected group of people so you might attend an event, together with 500 people, and still expect your presence to remain private, among that group of people.
我把我第一贴里内容和前后文都一起贴出吧。看到底是谁理解错了。
其实来自
(具体视频转在了我的主贴里。是两个弹琴的凑过去。然后有个女的跟他们说不要录他们,在几分钟内都很客气。。。后来双方才乱了套。)
https://www.internetlawcentre.co.uk/is- ... to-youtube
It is not illegal in the UK to film someone in public even if you film them without their consent. However, the definition of a public place is often narrow as it does not include places such as restaurants, hotels or even football grounds. These are all private places. Whenever an individual goes to a private place, such as a restaurant, they enjoy a reasonable expectation of privacy. This rule also applies to crowded places. Filming an individual where he or she is expecting their experience to remain private, could be unlawful. Follow this link to read about the law concerning secret recording and the use of spy cameras
A private place might have a large number of people present and it will still be considered as private. The privacy element may be confined to the company of a selected group of people so you might attend an event, together with 500 people, and still expect your presence to remain private, among that group of people. Furthermore, whilst someone may agree to be filmed for private use, you could still breach their privacy if you then upload their video to YouTube.
查到了英国相关法律的基本内容。发在了我自己开的主题里。
#35 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
你想多了,你表明不表明jb用没有,你在大街上拍你没商量
meiyoumajia 写了: 2024年 1月 24日 19:34 在英国和美国大部分州,在公共场合被拍摄的人在表明自己不愿意被录后,被录的视频如果不被删除就可能会是非法的
美国
https://recordinglaw.com/can-i-sue-some ... -property/
It is unlawful to film anyone who has a reasonable expectation of privacy without consent in 34 states.
英国
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/21081632/ ... %20grounds.
This rule also applies to crowded places.
According to the internet law centre, filming an individual where they are expecting their experience to remain private, could be unlawful.
This also includes large events.
The law centre said: "The privacy element may be confined to the company of a selected group of people so you might attend an event, together with 500 people, and still expect your presence to remain private, among that group of people.
If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#36 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
我得建议是你好好学英文,因为好像很难理解英语里最基本的定语从句是怎么用的
meiyoumajia 写了: 2024年 1月 25日 00:00 我把我第一贴里内容和前后文都一起贴出吧。看到底是谁理解错了。
其实来自
(具体视频转在了我的主贴里。是两个弹琴的凑过去。然后有个女的跟他们说不要录他们,在几分钟内都很客气。。。后来双方才乱了套。)
https://www.internetlawcentre.co.uk/is- ... to-youtube
It is not illegal in the UK to film someone in public even if you film them without their consent. However, the definition of a public place is often narrow as it does not include places such as restaurants, hotels or even football grounds. These are all private places. Whenever an individual goes to a private place, such as a restaurant, they enjoy a reasonable expectation of privacy. This rule also applies to crowded places. Filming an individual where he or she is expecting their experience to remain private, could be unlawful. Follow this link to read about the law concerning secret recording and the use of spy cameras
A private place might have a large number of people present and it will still be considered as private. The privacy element may be confined to the company of a selected group of people so you might attend an event, together with 500 people, and still expect your presence to remain private, among that group of people. Furthermore, whilst someone may agree to be filmed for private use, you could still breach their privacy if you then upload their video to YouTube.
查到了英国相关法律的基本内容。发在了我自己开的主题里。
x1

If printing money would end poverty, printing diplomas would end stupidity.
#39 Re: 钢琴事件传到国内去了,国人对此事的看法很准确
你看懂“This rule also applies to crowded places. ”这句了吗?关于英国的情况,在我开的主贴里有进一步/更详细的英国官方提供的信息。